Krb5: kerberos rc4-hmac-md5 checksum vulnerability enabling message spoofing via md5 collisions (CVE-2025-3576)
Published Last modified Sources: BSI, Siemens ProductCERT, Debian LTS, SUSE, Msrc Update Guide, CVE.org, EUVD
What is affected, what to do
A vulnerability in the MIT Kerberos implementation allows GSSAPI-protected messages using RC4-HMAC-MD5 to be spoofed due to weaknesses in the MD5 checksum design. If RC4 is preferred over stronger encryption types, an attacker could exploit MD5 collisions to forge message integrity codes.
Update Krb5 to version 1.22, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 to version 0:1.21.3-8.el10_0, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 to version 0:1.18.2-32.el8_10.
- Affected
- Krb5
lt *..1.22 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
lt *..0:1.21.3-8.el10_0 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
lt *..0:1.18.2-32.el8_10 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support
lt *..0:1.17-19.el8_2.3 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support
lt *..0:1.18.2-9.el8_4.3 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On
lt *..0:1.18.2-9.el8_4.3 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support
lt *..0:1.18.2-16.el8_6.4 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service
lt *..0:1.18.2-16.el8_6.4 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions
lt *..0:1.18.2-16.el8_6.4 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Telecommunications Update Service
lt *..0:1.18.2-26.el8_8.5 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Update Services for SAP Solutions
lt *..0:1.18.2-26.el8_8.5 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
lt *..0:1.21.1-8.el9_6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions
lt *..0:1.19.1-16.el9_0.4 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP Solutions
lt *..0:1.20.1-9.el9_2.3 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support
lt *..0:1.21.1-2.el9_4.2 - Red Hat Discovery 2
lt *..2.0.0-1752592913
- Krb5
- Fixed in
- Krb5
1.22 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
0:1.21.3-8.el10_0 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
0:1.18.2-32.el8_10 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support
0:1.17-19.el8_2.3 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support
0:1.18.2-9.el8_4.3 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On
0:1.18.2-9.el8_4.3 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support
0:1.18.2-16.el8_6.4 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service
0:1.18.2-16.el8_6.4 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions
0:1.18.2-16.el8_6.4 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Telecommunications Update Service
0:1.18.2-26.el8_8.5 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Update Services for SAP Solutions
0:1.18.2-26.el8_8.5 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
0:1.21.1-8.el9_6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions
0:1.19.1-16.el9_0.4 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP Solutions
0:1.20.1-9.el9_2.3 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support
0:1.21.1-2.el9_4.2 - Red Hat Discovery 2
2.0.0-1752592913
- Krb5
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
5.9
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
5.9
CVSS v3
Severity Medium on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: BSI, Siemens ProductCERT, Debian LTS, SUSE, Msrc Update Guide, CVE.org, EUVD
0.4 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 28.5
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Medium
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 44.63 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 5.9 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 5.9
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.4 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 28.5
- Elevated — this CVE ranks above at least 10% of all CVEs scored today.
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-328
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
A vulnerability in the MIT Kerberos implementation allows GSSAPI-protected messages using RC4-HMAC-MD5 to be spoofed due to weaknesses in the MD5 checksum design. If RC4 is preferred over stronger encryption types, an attacker could exploit MD5 collisions to forge message integrity codes. This may lead to unauthorized message tampering.
Source: BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF, siemens_advisory, Debian LTS Advisories, suse_csaf, Microsoft Security Update Guide, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE), ENISA EUVD
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| — | krb5 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Discovery 2 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-Life Add-On |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Telecommunications Update Service |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Update Services for SAP Solutions |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP Solutions |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Support |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 |
|
|
| Xerox | FreeFlow Print Server |
|
|
Vendors and products
- Debian Krb5
- Red Hat Red Hat Discovery 2
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Support Long-life Add-on
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services For Sap Solutions
Affected operating systems
| Linux | debian | krb5 | bullseye |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-328Use of Weak Hash
Base
The product uses an algorithm that produces a digest (output value) that does not meet security expectations for a hash function that allows an adversary to reasonably determine the original input (preimage attack), find another input that can produce the same hash (2nd preimage attack), or find multiple inputs that evaluate to the same hash (birthday attack).
Entry at MITRE CWE-328
References & sources
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:11487Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:13664Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:13777Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:15000Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:15001Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:15002Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:15003Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:15004Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:8411Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:9418Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2025:9430Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comsecurity/cve/CVE-2025-3576Vulnerability database, x_refsource_REDHAT
- bugzilla.redhat.comRHBZ#2359465Issue tracking, x_refsource_REDHAT
- web.mit.edukerberos/krb5-1.22/krb5-1.22.html
- lists.debian.orgdebian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00047.html
- Siemens ProductCERTproductcert/html/ssa-577017.html
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedRed Hat
Show 29 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) added —Affected value modified. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2025/3xxx/CVE-2025-3576.json">CVE-2025-3576</a>Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:11487Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:13664Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:13777Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15000Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15001Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15002Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15003Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15004Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:8411Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9418Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9430Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-3576Reference added —https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2359465Reference added —https://web.mit.edu/kerberos/krb5-1.22/krb5-1.22.htmlReference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:11487—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:13664—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:13777—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15000—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15001—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15002—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15003—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15004—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:8411—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9418—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9430—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-3576—Reference removed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2359465—Reference removed https://web.mit.edu/kerberos/krb5-1.22/krb5-1.22.html—Source identifier: secalert@redhat.com
Record modifiedCVE Program
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference added —https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00047.htmlReference removed https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00047.html—Source identifier: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Record modifiedSiemens ADP
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference added —https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-577017.htmlReference removed https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-577017.html—Source identifier: 0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e
Record modifiedRed Hat
1 individual change: Affected versions (publisher)
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) changed …, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 (+17)…, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 (+17)Source identifier: secalert@redhat.com
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2025-3576"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2025-3576.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2025-3576 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>