HighCVE-2025-34469

    Cowrie < 2.9.0 Unrestricted wget/curl Emulation Enables SSRF-Based DDoS Amplification (CVE-2025-34469)

    Published Last modified Sources: CVE.org, OSV

    What is affected, what to do

    Cowrie versions prior to 2.9.0 contain a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the emulated shell implementation of wget and curl. In the default emulated shell configuration, these command emulations perform real outbound HTTP requests to attacker-supplied destinations.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update Cowrie to version 2.9.0.

    Affected
    • Cowrie lt *..2.9.0
    Fixed in
    • Cowrie 2.9.0

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    7.5

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    7.5

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: CVE.org, OSV

    0.7 %

    EPSS score

    Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 51.6

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    High
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    72.11 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab) How we classify
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    7.5 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    7.5
    CVSS v4

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    6.9
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    0.7 %
    Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    51.6
    High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    —
    Published
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-918

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    Cowrie versions prior to 2.9.0 contain a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the emulated shell implementation of wget and curl. In the default emulated shell configuration, these command emulations perform real outbound HTTP requests to attacker-supplied destinations. Because no outbound request rate limiting was enforced, unauthenticated remote attackers could repeatedly invoke these commands to generate unbounded HTTP traffic toward arbitrary third-party targets, allowing the Cowrie honeypot to be abused as a denial-of-service amplification node and masking the attacker’s true source address behind the honeypot’s IP.

    Source: NVD (NIST), OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities), CVE.org (MITRE), cvelistv5

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    VendorProductAffected versionsFixed in
    CowrieCowrie
    • < 2.9.0
    • 2.9.0
    cowriecowrie
    • < 2.9.0
    • 2.9.0

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-918Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

      Base

      The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-918

    References & sources

    Reanalysis & status changes

    Chronological NVD audit events for this CVE — reanalyses, CVSS updates, CPE diffs.

    1. CVE Modifieddisclosure@vulncheck.com

      • Affected: after Affected value modified. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2025/34xxx/CVE-2025-34469.json">CVE-2025-34469</a>
      • Reference: after https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-83jg-m2pm-4jxj
      • Reference: after https://github.com/cowrie/cowrie/issues/2622
      • Reference: after https://github.com/cowrie/cowrie/pull/2800
    2. CVE Modified134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

      • Reference: after https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-83jg-m2pm-4jxj
      • Reference: before https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-83jg-m2pm-4jxj
      • Reference Type: before https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-83jg-m2pm-4jxj Types: Exploit, Third Party Advisory
    3. CVE Translatednvd@nist.gov

      • Translation: before Title: Cowrie, Description: Las versiones de Cowrie anteriores a la 2.9.0 contienen una vulnerabilidad de falsificación de petición del lado del servidor (SSRF) en la implementación de shell emulado de wget y curl. En la configuración predeterminada del shell emulado, estas emulaciones de comandos realizan peticiones HTTP salientes reales a destinos proporcionados por el atacante. Dado que no se aplicaba ninguna limitación de velocidad de peticiones salientes, atacantes remotos no autenticados podían invocar repetidamente estos comandos para generar tráfico HTTP ilimitado hacia objetivos arbitrarios de terceros, permitiendo que el honeypot de Cowrie fuera abusado como un nodo de amplificación de denegación de servicio y enmascarando la verdadera dirección de origen del atacante detrás de la IP del honeypot. after Title: Cowrie, Description: Las versiones de Cowrie anteriores a la 2.9.0 contienen una vulnerabilidad de falsificación de petición del lado del servidor (SSRF) en la implementación de shell emulado de wget y curl. En la configuración predeterminada del shell emulado, estas emulaciones de comandos realizan peticiones HTTP salientes reales a destinos proporcionados por el atacante. Dado que no se aplicaba ninguna limitación de velocidad de peticiones salientes, atacantes remotos no autenticados podían invocar repetidamente estos comandos para generar tráfico HTTP ilimitado hacia objetivos arbitrarios de terceros, permitiendo que el honeypot de Cowrie fuera abusado como un nodo de amplificación de denegación de servicio y enmascarando la verdadera dirección de origen del atacante detrás de la IP del honeypot.
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2025-34469
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2025-34469"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2025-34469.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2025-34469 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>