CrushFTP Authentication Bypass Vulnerability (CVE-2025-31161)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: NCSC NZ, pwn.watch, CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
CrushFTP 10 before 10.8.4 and 11 before 11.3.1 allows authentication bypass and takeover of the crushadmin account (unless a DMZ proxy instance is used), as exploited in the wild in March and April 2025, aka "Unauthenticated HTTP(S) port access." A race condition exists in the AWS4-HMAC (compatible with S3) authorization method of the HTTP component of the FTP server. The server first verifies the existence of the user by performing a call to login_user_pass() with no password requirement.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. Update CrushFTP to version 10.8.4, CrushFTP to version 11.3.1. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- CrushFTP
lt 10..10.8.4 - CrushFTP
lt 11..11.3.1
- CrushFTP
- Fixed in
- CrushFTP
10.8.4 - CrushFTP
11.3.1
- CrushFTP
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
9.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
9.8
CVSS v3
Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: NCSC NZ, pwn.watch, CVE.org
99.97 %
EPSS score
High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.98
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 262.46 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab), NCSC NZ How we classify
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 9.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 9.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 99.97 %
- High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 99.98
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossaryCWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-305
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This flaw is network-reachable without authentication or user interaction. The mangled AWS4-HMAC header makes exploitation deterministic and trivial, and with public exploit code and mass scanning it ranks among the CVEs most likely to be exploited. CISA also flags it for known ransomware campaign use. Managed file transfer platforms are prime targets for data theft and extortion because they concentrate sensitive partner exchanges and are usually internet-facing. Treat every internet-exposed CrushFTP instance below 10.8.4/11.3.1 as a top-priority emergency that requires both patching and a forensic review. KRITIS/NIS2 operators should also assess reporting obligations if indicators of compromise are found.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Patch now: Upgrade CrushFTP 10 to 10.8.4 or later and CrushFTP 11 to 11.3.1 or later. Apply via the built-in updater or the vendor package, restart the service, and confirm the version string in the WebInterface.
- Cut exposure if you can't patch within hours: Restrict the WebInterface HTTP(S) listeners at the perimeter to known partner IPs. Common defaults are 8080/443, but verify the actual ports in the server configuration. Otherwise, take the instance offline.
- Assume compromise and hunt: Exploitation predates broad patch availability. Review the following for unauthorised changes:
- user files under
users/MainUsers/ - newly created accounts
- modified permissions
- new VFS mappings
- user files under
- Rotate credentials: Reset
crushadminand every admin account first, then all remaining users. Also rotate any stored backend credentials (S3, SMB, SFTP targets) and service accounts configured in CrushFTP. - Kill live sessions: Invalidate existing sessions and
CrushAuthcookies with a service restart. Before logs roll over, preserve session and login logs from March 2025 onward for forensics.
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
-
Network segmentation: Front the internal server with a CrushFTP DMZ proxy instance. Per the CVE description,
crushadmintakeover does not work when a DMZ proxy is in use. Make the internal server reachable only from the DMZ node. -
WAF/IPS rule: Drop or alert on
Authorization: AWS4-HMAC-SHA256headers where- the
Credential=value ends in/right after the username, or SignedHeaders=is missing.
If you don't use the S3-compatible interface, block
AWS4-HMACheaders at the reverse proxy entirely. Suricata sketch:alert http any any -> $CRUSHFTP any (msg:"CVE-2025-31161 AWS4-HMAC without SignedHeaders"; http.header; content:"AWS4-HMAC"; nocase; content:!"SignedHeaders"; sid:9000001;). - the
-
Admin surface: Use CrushFTP's IP restrictions to limit admin access to a management network. Rename
crushadminor replace it with named admin accounts so the target username isn't guessable. -
Endpoint hardening: Run the CrushFTP service under a low-privilege service account, not SYSTEM/root. Use EDR or AppLocker to block the Java process from spawning shells or script interpreters.
-
Egress control: Restrict outbound traffic from the FTP server to required destinations. This hampers remote-management tool staging and data exfiltration.
-
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Reverse proxy/WAF logs: Look for
AWS4-HMAC-SHA256 Credential=<user>/with no trailing signature fields, especially where<user>iscrushadmin. Header logging must be enabled for this. Grep sketch:grep -E 'AWS4-HMAC-SHA256 Credential=[A-Za-z0-9_.-]+/[",]' proxy.log. - CrushFTP application logs (
CrushFTP.log, session logs): Watch for successful logins with no preceding password check, quickly followed by/WebInterface/function/calls withcommand=getUserList,setUserItemorsetServerItem. Admin logins from unfamiliar source IPs are also suspicious. - File integrity monitoring: Alert on writes to
users/MainUsers/*/user.XMLand on new user directories. On Windows, use Sysmon EID 11; on Linux, use the auditd watch-w <crushftp>/users/ -p wa -k crushftp_users. - EDR process ancestry: Flag
java/CrushFTPServicespawningcmd.exe,powershell.exe,shorbash. KQL:DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName in~ ("java.exe","javaw.exe","CrushFTPService.exe") and FileName in~ ("cmd.exe","powershell.exe","rundll32.exe"). - Network telemetry (Zeek): Watch for unusually large outbound transfers from the FTP server and new connections to remote-management or tunnelling services. A burst of alternating HTTP 401/200 responses on the WebInterface may indicate race-condition attempts.
- Reverse proxy/WAF logs: Look for
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
CrushFTP 10 before 10.8.4 and 11 before 11.3.1 allows authentication bypass and takeover of the crushadmin account (unless a DMZ proxy instance is used), as exploited in the wild in March and April 2025, aka "Unauthenticated HTTP(S) port access." A race condition exists in the AWS4-HMAC (compatible with S3) authorization method of the HTTP component of the FTP server. The server first verifies the existence of the user by performing a call to login_user_pass() with no password requirement. This will authenticate the session through the HMAC verification process and up until the server checks for user verification once more. The vulnerability can be further stabilized, eliminating the need for successfully triggering a race condition, by sending a mangled AWS4-HMAC header. By providing only the username and a following slash (/), the server will successfully find a username, which triggers the successful anypass authentication process, but the server will fail to find the expected SignedHeaders entry, resulting in an index-out-of-bounds error that stops the code from reaching the session cleanup. Together, these issues make it trivial to authenticate as any known or guessable user (e.g., crushadmin), and can lead to a full compromise of the system by obtaining an administrative account.
Source: NCSC NZ (CC BY 4.0), pwn.watch, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| CrushFTP | CrushFTP |
|
|
| crushftp | crushftp |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-305Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness
Base
The authentication algorithm is sound, but the implemented mechanism can be bypassed as the result of a separate weakness that is primary to the authentication error.
Entry at MITRE CWE-305
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| NCSC NZ | CVE-2025-31161 affecting CrushFTP - update (opens in a new tab)NCSC NZ | actively exploited | |
| Reference tagged as exploit | attackerkb.com (opens in a new tab) | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
| Reference tagged as exploit | projectdiscovery.io (opens in a new tab) | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
References & sources
- outpost24.comblog/crushftp-auth-bypass-vulnerabilityThird-party advisory
- crushftp.comcrush11wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=UpdateVendor advisory
- projectdiscovery.ioblog/crushftp-authentication-bypassExploit, Third-party advisory
- darkreading.comvulnerabilities-threats/disclosure-drama-clouds-crushftp-vulner…Press coverage
- huntress.comblog/crushftp-cve-2025-31161-auth-bypass-and-post-exploitationExploit, Third-party advisory
- attackerkb.comtopics/k0EgiL9Psz/cve-2025-2825/rapid7-analysisExploit, Third-party advisory
- infosecurity-magazine.comnews/crushftp-flaw-exploited-disclosurePress coverage
- vicarius.iovsociety/posts/cve-2025-31161-detect-crushftp-vulnerabilityExploit, Third-party advisory
- vicarius.iovsociety/posts/cve-2025-31161-mitigate-crushftp-vulnerabilityMitigation, Third-party advisory
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-31161government-resource, US government resource
- pwn.watchpwn.watch: CrushFTP: Authentication Bypass Vulnerabilitypwn-watch
- crushftp.comCrushFTP advisory: CrushFTPpwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2025-31161pwn-watch
- cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2025-31161"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2025-31161.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2025-31161 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>