CriticalCVE-2025-30406

    Gladinet CentreStack and Triofox Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key Vulnerability (CVE-2025-30406)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: pwn.watch, CVE.org

    Share

    What is affected, what to do

    Gladinet CentreStack through 16.1.10296.56315 (fixed in 16.4.10315.56368) has a deserialization vulnerability due to the CentreStack portal's hardcoded machineKey use, as exploited in the wild in March 2025. This enables threat actors (who know the machineKey) to serialize a payload for server-side deserialization to achieve remote code execution. NOTE: a CentreStack admin can manually delete the machineKey defined in portal\web.config.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update Gladinet CentreStack to version 16.4.10315.56368. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • Gladinet CentreStack lt *..16.4.10315.56368
    Fixed in
    • Gladinet CentreStack 16.4.10315.56368

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    9.8

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    9.0

    CVSS v3

    Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: pwn.watch, CVE.org

    94.3 %

    EPSS score

    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.85

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    233.14 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab) How we classify
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    9.8 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    9.0
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    94.3 %
    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    99.85
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 8 April 2025
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-321

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    This flaw is reachable over the network with no authentication and no user interaction, and it yields code execution as the IIS worker process. Every installation shipped the same key, so knowing the public machineKey is enough for reliable exploitation. That puts it among the CVEs most likely to be exploited. Typical victims run CentreStack or Triofox as an internet-facing file-sharing or remote-access gateway joined to AD. Such a server is an ideal foothold for data theft and lateral movement, even though CISA has not flagged ransomware use. Treat any internet-reachable, unpatched instance as critical and act immediately. Also run a compromise assessment on already-patched hosts whose history is unclear.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Inventory: Identify every Gladinet CentreStack and Triofox instance, including cluster and worker nodes, and record the installed build. CentreStack up to and including 16.1.10296.56315 is affected.
      • Patch: Upgrade CentreStack to 16.4.10315.56368 or later. For Triofox, a patch is available from the vendor — look up the exact version in the vendor advisory.
      • Rotate the machineKey: If you can't upgrade right away, remove the hard-coded <machineKey> element from portal\web.config or replace it with uniquely generated validationKey/decryptionKey values, then run iisreset. Regenerate the key after patching as well if prior compromise cannot be ruled out.
      • Cut exposure: Put the web portal (TCP 443/80) behind VPN or an IP allowlist, or take it offline, until patching and key rotation are complete.
      • Compromise assessment: Hunt through IIS logs and EDR telemetry back to March 2025 (see detection rules). On any hit, isolate the host, capture a forensic image, and open an incident aligned with the NIS2 early-warning deadline of 24 h.
      • Rotate secrets: On confirmed or suspected compromise, rotate every secret stored on the server. This includes service accounts, AD bind accounts, cloud storage access keys and database credentials.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Network segmentation: Host CentreStack/Triofox in a DMZ. Apply default-deny egress so the server can reach only the storage and AD targets it needs, which blocks reverse shells and second-stage downloads.
      • WAF/IPS: Alert on or block POSTs to .aspx endpoints that carry oversized __VIEWSTATE parameters. After decoding, also look for known gadget-chain markers in Base64, such as AAEAAAD///// (BinaryFormatter header) or TypeConfuseDelegate/ObjectDataProvider fragments.
      • Endpoint hardening: Use an EDR rule or AppLocker/WDAC to stop w3wp.exe from spawning cmd.exe, powershell.exe, rundll32.exe, certutil.exe or mshta.exe.
      • Least privilege: Don't run the IIS application pool as LocalSystem or with domain admin rights. Use a dedicated identity with minimal NTFS and AD permissions.
      • Configuration integrity: Put portal\web.config under file integrity monitoring. Verify that no node still carries the default machineKey, especially cloned VMs and golden images.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • ASP.NET events (Windows Application log): Event ID 1316 with event code 4009 ("Viewstate verification failed") indicates tampered ViewState payloads. Bursts from a single external IP are a strong signal. Example KQL: Event | where Source startswith "ASP.NET" and EventID == 1316 and RenderedDescription has "4009".
      • Process ancestry (Sysmon EID 1 / EDR): Any child process of w3wp.exe on CentreStack hosts. Sigma shape: ParentImage|endswith: '\w3wp.exe' AND Image|endswith: ['\cmd.exe','\powershell.exe','\certutil.exe','\curl.exe','\whoami.exe'].
      • IIS access logs: POSTs to portal .aspx pages that return 500 or have abnormally large request sizes, followed by unusual outbound traffic. Example SPL: index=iis cs_method=POST cs_uri_stem="*.aspx" sc_status=500 | stats count by c_ip, cs_uri_stem.
      • Persistence and staging: Sysmon EID 11 file creation by w3wp.exe in the webroot (*.aspx, *.ashx, *.dll) suggests webshells. Watch Sysmon EID 3 or Zeek conn.log for new outbound connections from the server to unfamiliar destinations.
      • Credential access: LSASS access (Sysmon EID 10) and new local accounts (Security EID 4720/4732) on the server shortly after a suspicious web request.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    Gladinet CentreStack through 16.1.10296.56315 (fixed in 16.4.10315.56368) has a deserialization vulnerability due to the CentreStack portal's hardcoded machineKey use, as exploited in the wild in March 2025. This enables threat actors (who know the machineKey) to serialize a payload for server-side deserialization to achieve remote code execution. NOTE: a CentreStack admin can manually delete the machineKey defined in portal\web.config.

    Source: pwn.watch, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    GladinetCentreStack
    • < 16.4.10315.56368
    • 16.4.10315.56368
    gladinetcentrestack
    • < 16.4.10315.56368
    • 16.4.10315.56368

    Vendors and products

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-321Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key

      Variant

      The product uses a hard-coded, unchangeable cryptographic key.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-321

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited

    References & sources

    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2025-30406
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2025-30406"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2025-30406.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2025-30406 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>