Gladinet CentreStack and Triofox Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key Vulnerability (CVE-2025-30406)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: pwn.watch, CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
Gladinet CentreStack through 16.1.10296.56315 (fixed in 16.4.10315.56368) has a deserialization vulnerability due to the CentreStack portal's hardcoded machineKey use, as exploited in the wild in March 2025. This enables threat actors (who know the machineKey) to serialize a payload for server-side deserialization to achieve remote code execution. NOTE: a CentreStack admin can manually delete the machineKey defined in portal\web.config.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update Gladinet CentreStack to version 16.4.10315.56368. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Gladinet CentreStack
lt *..16.4.10315.56368
- Gladinet CentreStack
- Fixed in
- Gladinet CentreStack
16.4.10315.56368
- Gladinet CentreStack
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
9.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
9.0
CVSS v3
Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: pwn.watch, CVE.org
94.3 %
EPSS score
High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.85
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 233.14 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab) How we classify
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 9.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 9.0
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 94.3 %
- High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 99.85
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 8 April 2025
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-321
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This flaw is reachable over the network with no authentication and no user interaction, and it yields code execution as the IIS worker process. Every installation shipped the same key, so knowing the public machineKey is enough for reliable exploitation. That puts it among the CVEs most likely to be exploited. Typical victims run CentreStack or Triofox as an internet-facing file-sharing or remote-access gateway joined to AD. Such a server is an ideal foothold for data theft and lateral movement, even though CISA has not flagged ransomware use. Treat any internet-reachable, unpatched instance as critical and act immediately. Also run a compromise assessment on already-patched hosts whose history is unclear.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Inventory: Identify every Gladinet CentreStack and Triofox instance, including cluster and worker nodes, and record the installed build. CentreStack up to and including 16.1.10296.56315 is affected.
- Patch: Upgrade CentreStack to 16.4.10315.56368 or later. For Triofox, a patch is available from the vendor — look up the exact version in the vendor advisory.
- Rotate the machineKey: If you can't upgrade right away, remove the hard-coded
<machineKey>element fromportal\web.configor replace it with uniquely generatedvalidationKey/decryptionKeyvalues, then runiisreset. Regenerate the key after patching as well if prior compromise cannot be ruled out. - Cut exposure: Put the web portal (TCP 443/80) behind VPN or an IP allowlist, or take it offline, until patching and key rotation are complete.
- Compromise assessment: Hunt through IIS logs and EDR telemetry back to March 2025 (see detection rules). On any hit, isolate the host, capture a forensic image, and open an incident aligned with the NIS2 early-warning deadline of 24 h.
- Rotate secrets: On confirmed or suspected compromise, rotate every secret stored on the server. This includes service accounts, AD bind accounts, cloud storage access keys and database credentials.
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network segmentation: Host CentreStack/Triofox in a DMZ. Apply default-deny egress so the server can reach only the storage and AD targets it needs, which blocks reverse shells and second-stage downloads.
- WAF/IPS: Alert on or block POSTs to
.aspxendpoints that carry oversized__VIEWSTATEparameters. After decoding, also look for known gadget-chain markers in Base64, such asAAEAAAD/////(BinaryFormatter header) orTypeConfuseDelegate/ObjectDataProviderfragments. - Endpoint hardening: Use an EDR rule or AppLocker/WDAC to stop
w3wp.exefrom spawningcmd.exe,powershell.exe,rundll32.exe,certutil.exeormshta.exe. - Least privilege: Don't run the IIS application pool as
LocalSystemor with domain admin rights. Use a dedicated identity with minimal NTFS and AD permissions. - Configuration integrity: Put
portal\web.configunder file integrity monitoring. Verify that no node still carries the default machineKey, especially cloned VMs and golden images.
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- ASP.NET events (Windows Application log): Event ID 1316 with event code 4009 ("Viewstate verification failed") indicates tampered ViewState payloads. Bursts from a single external IP are a strong signal. Example KQL:
Event | where Source startswith "ASP.NET" and EventID == 1316 and RenderedDescription has "4009". - Process ancestry (Sysmon EID 1 / EDR): Any child process of
w3wp.exeon CentreStack hosts. Sigma shape:ParentImage|endswith: '\w3wp.exe'ANDImage|endswith: ['\cmd.exe','\powershell.exe','\certutil.exe','\curl.exe','\whoami.exe']. - IIS access logs: POSTs to portal
.aspxpages that return 500 or have abnormally large request sizes, followed by unusual outbound traffic. Example SPL:index=iis cs_method=POST cs_uri_stem="*.aspx" sc_status=500 | stats count by c_ip, cs_uri_stem. - Persistence and staging: Sysmon EID 11 file creation by
w3wp.exein the webroot (*.aspx,*.ashx,*.dll) suggests webshells. Watch Sysmon EID 3 or Zeekconn.logfor new outbound connections from the server to unfamiliar destinations. - Credential access: LSASS access (Sysmon EID 10) and new local accounts (Security EID 4720/4732) on the server shortly after a suspicious web request.
- ASP.NET events (Windows Application log): Event ID 1316 with event code 4009 ("Viewstate verification failed") indicates tampered ViewState payloads. Bursts from a single external IP are a strong signal. Example KQL:
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Gladinet CentreStack through 16.1.10296.56315 (fixed in 16.4.10315.56368) has a deserialization vulnerability due to the CentreStack portal's hardcoded machineKey use, as exploited in the wild in March 2025. This enables threat actors (who know the machineKey) to serialize a payload for server-side deserialization to achieve remote code execution. NOTE: a CentreStack admin can manually delete the machineKey defined in portal\web.config.
Source: pwn.watch, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gladinet | CentreStack |
|
|
| gladinet | centrestack |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-321Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key
Variant
The product uses a hard-coded, unchangeable cryptographic key.
Entry at MITRE CWE-321
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited |
References & sources
- centrestack.comp/gce_latest_release.htmlRelease notes
- gladinetsupport.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.comGladinet advisory: Gladinet CentreStackMitigation, Patch, Vendor advisory, pwn-watch
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-30406government-resource, US government resource
- pwn.watchpwn.watch: Gladinet CentreStack: CentreStack and Triofox Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key Vulnerabilitypwn-watch
- gladinetsupport.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.comGladinet advisory: Gladinet CentreStackpwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2025-30406pwn-watch
- cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2025-30406"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2025-30406.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2025-30406 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>