Windows Agere Modem Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability (CVE-2025-24990)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org, pwn.watch, Msrc Update Guide
What is affected, what to do
Microsoft is aware of vulnerabilities in the third party Agere Modem driver that ships natively with supported Windows operating systems. This is an announcement of the upcoming removal of ltmdm64.sys driver.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507 to version 10.0.10240.21161, Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607 to version 10.0.14393.8519, Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809 to version 10.0.17763.7919. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507
lt 10.0.10240.0..10.0.10240.21161 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607
lt 10.0.14393.0..10.0.14393.8519 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809
lt 10.0.17763.0..10.0.17763.7919 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21H2
lt 10.0.19044.0..10.0.19044.6456 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 22H2
lt 10.0.19045.0..10.0.19045.6456 - Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H2
lt 10.0.22621.0..10.0.22621.6060 - Microsoft Windows 11 Version 23H2
lt 10.0.22631.0..10.0.22631.6060 - Microsoft Windows 11 Version 24H2
lt 10.0.26100.0..10.0.26100.6899 - Microsoft Windows 11 Version 25H2
lt 10.0.26200.0..10.0.26200.6899 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1
lt 6.1.7601.0..6.1.7601.27974 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)
lt 6.1.7601.0..6.1.7601.27974 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2
lt 6.0.6003.0..6.0.6003.23571 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)
lt 6.0.6003.0..6.0.6003.23571 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012
lt 6.2.9200.0..6.2.9200.25722 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)
lt 6.2.9200.0..6.2.9200.25722 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2
lt 6.3.9600.0..6.3.9600.22824 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
lt 6.3.9600.0..6.3.9600.22824 - Microsoft Windows Server 2016
lt 10.0.14393.0..10.0.14393.8519 - Microsoft Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)
lt 10.0.14393.0..10.0.14393.8519 - Microsoft Windows Server 2019
lt 10.0.17763.0..10.0.17763.7919 - Microsoft Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)
lt 10.0.17763.0..10.0.17763.7919 - Microsoft Windows Server 2022
lt 10.0.20348.0..10.0.20348.4294 - Microsoft Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)
lt 10.0.25398.0..10.0.25398.1913 - Microsoft Windows Server 2025
lt 10.0.26100.0..10.0.26100.6899 - Microsoft Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)
lt 10.0.26100.0..10.0.26100.6899
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507
- Fixed in
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507
10.0.10240.21161 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607
10.0.14393.8519 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809
10.0.17763.7919 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21H2
10.0.19044.6456 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 22H2
10.0.19045.6456 - Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H2
10.0.22621.6060 - Microsoft Windows 11 Version 23H2
10.0.22631.6060 - Microsoft Windows 11 Version 24H2
10.0.26100.6899 - Microsoft Windows 11 Version 25H2
10.0.26200.6899 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1
6.1.7601.27974 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)
6.1.7601.27974 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2
6.0.6003.23571 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)
6.0.6003.23571 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012
6.2.9200.25722 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)
6.2.9200.25722 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2
6.3.9600.22824 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
6.3.9600.22824 - Microsoft Windows Server 2016
10.0.14393.8519 - Microsoft Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)
10.0.14393.8519 - Microsoft Windows Server 2019
10.0.17763.7919 - Microsoft Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)
10.0.17763.7919 - Microsoft Windows Server 2022
10.0.20348.4294 - Microsoft Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)
10.0.25398.1913 - Microsoft Windows Server 2025
10.0.26100.6899 - Microsoft Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)
10.0.26100.6899
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
7.8
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org, pwn.watch, Msrc Update Guide
6.4 %
EPSS score
Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 93.7
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 220.60 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab) How we classify
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 6.4 %
- Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 93.7
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 15 October 2025
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-822
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This is a local privilege escalation that requires only low privileges and no user interaction, yet gives full control of confidentiality, integrity and availability. Attackers chain it after phishing, stolen VPN access or web shells to reach SYSTEM, disable EDR and harvest credentials. The key amplifier is that the driver shipped inbox on essentially every Windows install, whether or not modem hardware was present, so the exposed surface is your entire client and session-host estate. Exploitation likelihood is markedly elevated compared to most CVEs, and CISA does not flag known ransomware use. Recommendation: patch shared and admin systems within days at high priority, and roll out to the rest of the fleet on an accelerated regular cycle. Keep any fax-dependent holdouts as documented exceptions protected by a WDAC block.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
-
Fast-track the October 2025 Windows cumulative update. It removes
ltmdm64.sysentirely. Minimum target builds per the advisory:- Win10 1507: 10.0.10240.21161
- Win10 1607: 10.0.14393.8519
- Win10 1809: 10.0.17763.7919
- Win10 21H2/22H2: 10.0.19044.6456 / 10.0.19045.6456
- Win11 22H2/23H2: 10.0.22621.6060 / 10.0.22631.6060
- Win11 24H2: 10.0.26100.6899
Look up the KB number in the Microsoft Security Update Guide.
-
Find every host that still lacks the update. Query Intune, SCCM or your EDR inventory for builds below target. Confirm on the host that the driver is gone:
Get-CimInstance Win32_SystemDriver | Where-Object PathName -like '*ltmdm64*'orTest-Path C:\Windows\System32\drivers\ltmdm64.sys. -
Patch multi-user systems first. This means RDS/Citrix hosts, VDI golden images, jump hosts and admin workstations, where many unprivileged accounts can run local code.
-
Inventory fax-modem dependencies. Agere/LSI soft-modem hardware stops working after the update. Engage the business owners now (healthcare, logistics and dispatch fax workflows are typical) and plan a move to FoIP or cloud fax. Do not pause patching to accommodate this.
-
If you suspect compromise: Isolate the host and rotate local admin credentials via LAPS. Treat any domain credentials cached on that host as compromised.
-
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Application and driver control: Deploy a WDAC/App Control deny rule for
ltmdm64.sys(file name plus hash or publisher rule) in enforced mode. This blocks the driver from loading on unpatched machines and prevents BYOVD reintroduction on patched ones. Enable HVCI/Memory Integrity and enforce the Microsoft Vulnerable Driver Blocklist. - Configuration change if patching lags: Block the driver through the device-installation restriction Group Policy. Where no modem hardware is needed, disable or prevent the driver service from starting. Pilot this on a test ring first.
- Make initial access harder: The flaw can only be exploited locally, so the attacker first needs code execution as a standard user. These controls shrink that first stage:
- ASR rules (Office child processes, executable content from email/webmail, obfuscated scripts)
- AppLocker or WDAC for user-writable paths (
%APPDATA%,%TEMP%, Downloads) - Macro blocking
- IAM/least privilege: Restrict interactive logon on servers and shared hosts to the minimum needed. Enforce admin tiering so that local privilege escalation does not hand over Tier-0 credentials. Enable LSA protection (RunAsPPL) and Credential Guard.
- Network segmentation: Move legacy fax-dependent machines that cannot be patched into a dedicated VLAN. Block SMB, RDP and WinRM from that VLAN to server and admin networks to contain lateral movement after a successful escalation.
- Application and driver control: Deploy a WDAC/App Control deny rule for
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Driver load (Sysmon EID 6 / MDE): Treat any load of
ltmdm64.syson a machine with no documented modem as suspicious. KQL:DeviceEvents | where ActionType == "DriverLoad" and FileName =~ "ltmdm64.sys". Sigma:logsource: windows/driver_load,ImageLoaded|endswith: '\ltmdm64.sys'. - Post-patch reintroduction (Sysmon EID 11, System 7045 / Security 4697): Watch for creation of
ltmdm64.sysoutside WinSxS servicing, or a new kernel service pointing at that file. On a patched host this strongly indicates BYOVD. - Process ancestry showing a privilege jump (Sysmon EID 1 / Security 4688): Look for a child process at
IntegrityLevel=Systemwhose parent runs as a medium-integrity standard user. Typical children arecmd.exe,powershell.exe,rundll32.exeor unsigned binaries from user paths. SPL starting point:index=sysmon EventCode=1 IntegrityLevel=System ParentUser!="NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM". - Follow-on activity: Correlate the events above with what tends to follow shortly after:
- Security 4672 for unexpected accounts
- LSASS access (Sysmon EID 10 with
TargetImageending inlsass.exe) - Local admin creation (4720/4732)
- Defender tampering (Defender EID 5001)
- Driver load (Sysmon EID 6 / MDE): Treat any load of
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Microsoft is aware of vulnerabilities in the third party Agere Modem driver that ships natively with supported Windows operating systems. This is an announcement of the upcoming removal of ltmdm64.sys driver. The driver has been removed in the October cumulative update. Fax modem hardware dependent on this specific driver will no longer work on Windows. Microsoft recommends removing any existing dependencies on this hardware.
Source: NVD (NIST), CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE), pwn.watch, Microsoft Security Update Guide, cvelistv5
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1507 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1607 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1809 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 21H2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 22H2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 version 22H2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 Version 23H2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 Version 24H2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 Version 25H2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 R2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2019 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2022 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2025 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
Vendors and products
- Microsoft Windows 10 1507
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 1607
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 1809
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 21H2
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 22h2
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21h2
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 22h2
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 11 22H2
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 11 23H2
Affected operating systems
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1507 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1607 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1809 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_21h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_22h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_11_22h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_11_23h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_11_24h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_11_25h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2008 | r2 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2008 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2012 | r2 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2012 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2016 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2019 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2022 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2022_23h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2025 | — |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-822Untrusted Pointer Dereference
Base
The product obtains a value from an untrusted source, converts this value to a pointer, and dereferences the resulting pointer.
Entry at MITRE CWE-822
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2025-24990 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified |
References & sources
- Microsoft Security Update GuideWindows Agere Modem Driver Elevation of Privilege VulnerabilityVendor advisory, Patch, Vendor advisory
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-24990government-resource, US government resource
- vicarius.iovsociety/posts/cve-2025-24990-detection-script-elevation-of-pri…Third-party advisory
- vicarius.iovsociety/posts/cve-2025-24990-mitigation-script-elevation-of-pr…Mitigation, Third-party advisory
- pwn.watchpwn.watch: Microsoft Windows: 2 exploited vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-24990, CVE-2025-59230)pwn-watch
- Microsoft Security Update GuideMicrosoft advisory: Microsoft Windowspwn-watch
- Microsoft Security Update GuideMicrosoft advisory: Microsoft Windowspwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2025-24990pwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2025-59230pwn-watch
- cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2025-24990"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2025-24990.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2025-24990 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>