CriticalCVE-2025-22225

    VMware ESXi Arbitrary Write Vulnerability (CVE-2025-22225)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: pwn.watch, CVE.org, SingCERT

    What is affected, what to do

    VMware ESXi contains an arbitrary write vulnerability. A malicious actor with privileges within the VMX process may trigger an arbitrary kernel write leading to an escape of the sandbox.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • VMware ESXi gte 8.0..*
    • VMware ESXi gte 7.0..*
    • VMware Cloud Foundation eq 5.x, 4.5.x..5.x, 4.5.x
    • VMware Telco Cloud Platform eq 5.x, 4.x, 3.x, 2.x..5.x, 4.x, 3.x, 2.x
    • VMware Telco Cloud Infrastructure eq 3.x, 2.x..3.x, 2.x

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    8.2

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    8.2

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: pwn.watch, CVE.org, SingCERT

    1.0 %

    EPSS score

    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 63.3

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    206.09 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab), CERT.at, CSA/SingCERT How we classify
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    8.2 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    8.2
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    1.0 %
    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    63.3
    High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 4 March 2025
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-123

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    This flaw is the pivotal link in a VM-escape chain. Combined with CVE-2025-22224 (code execution in VMX from the guest) and CVE-2025-22226 (information leak), it lets an attacker break out of a compromised VM onto the hypervisor and reach every workload on the host. The local attack vector and high privilege requirement look reassuring at first glance. However, the scope change and full impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability make the outcome severe, and CISA records known use in ransomware campaigns. The modelled exploitation likelihood is only moderate, but confirmed ransomware use outweighs that signal. Organisations running vSphere clusters that host exposed, multi-tenant or VDI guests should treat this as top priority and patch within days, not weeks. Single-tenant hosts with hardened guests can follow, but still within the emergency patch cycle.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Apply the vendor patch: Fixed ESXi builds are published in the Broadcom advisory, alongside the related CVE-2025-22224 and CVE-2025-22226. Look up the exact build numbers in the vendor advisory. Start by inventorying versions with esxcli system version get or a vCenter-wide query. Cloud Foundation and Telco Cloud Platform have separate async patches.
      • Order patching by guest trust level: Hosts running untrusted or exposed guests go first: DMZ VMs, VDI, multi-tenant workloads and dev/test VMs with broad admin access. The attacker needs privileges inside the VMX process, typically gained from a compromised guest with local admin rights.
      • Triage for compromise before patching: Preserve evidence before hosts reboot. Collect /var/log/vmkernel.log, vmkwarning.log, hostd.log, shell.log, auth.log, core dumps under /var/core and per-VM vmware.log. Patching and rebooting will not remove persistence an attacker has already planted.
      • Restrict administrative access: Disable SSH and ESXi Shell on every host unless operationally required. Rotate root and vCenter SSO credentials on any host showing anomalies. Check whether AD groups such as "ESX Admins" automatically receive full host privileges.
      • Secure backups: Treat the ransomware flag seriously. Confirm that datastore backups are offline or immutable and authenticate separately from vSphere SSO. Isolate the backup server from the host management network.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Hypervisor configuration: The vendor lists no equivalent workaround, so patching is the only complete fix. In the meantime, enable Lockdown Mode (Normal or Strict) and set VMkernel.Boot.execInstalledOnly=TRUE to block unsigned, dropped binaries. Monitor Secure Boot and TPM attestation status in vCenter.
      • Guest attack-surface reduction: Remove unneeded virtual hardware such as VMCI devices, shared folders (HGFS), USB and serial controllers. This shrinks the entry path the exploit chain uses to get from the guest into the VMX process. Cut local admin rights inside guests to least privilege.
      • Network segmentation: Expose ESXi management services (443/tcp, 902/tcp, 22/tcp, 5989/tcp CIM-SLP) only to a dedicated admin VLAN or jump hosts. Deny all outbound internet traffic from VMkernel management IPs, since a hypervisor has no business talking to C2 infrastructure.
      • IAM: Separate vCenter and ESXi roles and minimise accounts holding the Administrator role. Enforce MFA for vCenter login through the identity provider. Review AD integration of hosts so that a domain compromise does not automatically become a hypervisor compromise.
      • Workload placement: Until patched, do not co-locate guests of different trust levels on the same host. Use DRS rules to move exposed VMs onto separate clusters.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • VMX crashes and kernel anomalies: Unexpected VMX crashes, new files under /var/core/ and kernel warnings in vmkwarning.log outside maintenance windows suggest exploitation attempts. Example SPL: index=esxi (source="*vmkwarning.log" OR source="*vmware.log") ("VMX" AND ("panic" OR "Unexpected signal" OR "core dump")).

      • Persistence and tampering: Alert on these changes:

        • VIB acceptance level lowered to CommunitySupported
        • newly installed VIBs
        • execInstalledOnly disabled
        • edits to /etc/rc.local.d/local.sh or /etc/init.d/

        Automate a baseline diff using esxcli software vib list and esxcli software acceptance get.

      • Administrative activity: In hostd.log and vCenter events, watch for "SSH access has been enabled" and "ESXi Shell enabled". In shell.log, look for vim-cmd vmsvc/power.off, esxcli vm process kill, esxcli system settings and execution from /tmp. A Sigma rule can correlate esxcli vm process kill with power.off within 10 minutes.

      • Ransomware indicators on datastores: Strong warning signs include mass renaming of .vmdk/.vmx files, ransom notes appearing in /vmfs/volumes/* and many VMs powering off at once. Define vCenter alarms with a threshold, for example more than 5 "VM powered off" events per host within 5 minutes.

      • Network telemetry: In Zeek/Suricata, flag outbound connections from ESXi management IPs to non-infrastructure destinations, e.g. KQL: CommonSecurityLog | where SourceIP in (esxi_mgmt_ips) and not(DestinationIP in (allowed_infra)). Also watch for unexpected listening sockets visible via esxcli network ip connection list.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    VMware ESXi contains an arbitrary write vulnerability. A malicious actor with privileges within the VMX process may trigger an arbitrary kernel write leading to an escape of the sandbox.

    Source: pwn.watch, cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE), CSA/SingCERT

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    —VMware Cloud Foundation
    • 5.x, 4.5.x
    • —
    —VMware ESXi
    • ≥ 7.0
    • ≥ 8.0
    • —
    • —
    —VMware Telco Cloud Infrastructure
    • 3.x, 2.x
    • —
    —VMware Telco Cloud Platform
    • 5.x, 4.x, 3.x, 2.x
    • —
    vmwarecloud_foundation
    • —
    • —
    vmwaretelco_cloud_infrastructure
    • 2.7
    • 2.5
    • 2.2
    • 3.0
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    vmwaretelco_cloud_platform
    • 4.0.1
    • 2.5
    • 2.7
    • 4.0
    • 3.0
    • 2.0
    • 5.0
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —

    Vendors and products

    Affected operating systems

    Affected operating systems
    Othervmwareesxi7.0
    Othervmwareesxi8.0

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-123Write-what-where Condition

      Base

      Any condition where the attacker has the ability to write an arbitrary value to an arbitrary location, often as the result of a buffer overflow.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-123

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited
    CSA/SingCERTMultiple Vulnerabilities in VMware Products (opens in a new tab)CSA/SingCERTactively exploited

    References & sources

    • support.broadcom.comVMware advisory: VMware ESXipwn-watch
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-22225government-resource
    • cert.atCERT.at: Kritische Sicherheitslücken in VMware ESXi, Workstation und Fusion - aktiv ausgenutzt - Updates verfügbarcert-at
    • pwn.watchpwn.watch: VMware ESXi: ESXi Arbitrary Write Vulnerabilitypwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2025-22225pwn-watch
    • cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2025-22225
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2025-22225"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2025-22225.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2025-22225 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>