Linux Kernel: Denial of Service (CVE-2024-58077)
Published Last modified Sources: BSI, Debian LTS, Siemens ProductCERT, Red Hat, SUSE, CVE.org, EUVD
What is affected, what to do
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ASoC: soc-pcm: don't use soc_pcm_ret() on .prepare callback commit 1f5664351410 ("ASoC: lower "no backend DAIs enabled for ... Port" log severity") ignores -EINVAL error message on common soc_pcm_ret().
Update Linux Kernel to version 6.6.78, Linux Kernel to version 6.12.14, Linux Kernel to version 6.13.3.
- Affected
- Linux Kernel
lt 6.5..6.6.78 - Linux Kernel
lt 6.7..6.12.14 - Linux Kernel
lt 6.13..6.13.3
- Linux Kernel
- Fixed in
- Linux Kernel
6.6.78 - Linux Kernel
6.12.14 - Linux Kernel
6.13.3 - Linux Kernel
6.14
- Linux Kernel
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
5.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
5.5
CVSS v3
Severity Medium on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: BSI, Debian LTS, Siemens ProductCERT, Red Hat, SUSE, CVE.org, EUVD
0.2 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 8.0
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Medium
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 36.11 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 5.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 5.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.2 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 8.0
- Low — this CVE sits in the lower 10% of all CVEs scored today.
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ASoC: soc-pcm: don't use soc_pcm_ret() on .prepare callback commit 1f5664351410 ("ASoC: lower "no backend DAIs enabled for ... Port" log severity") ignores -EINVAL error message on common soc_pcm_ret(). It is used from many functions, ignoring -EINVAL is over-kill. The reason why -EINVAL was ignored was it really should only be used upon invalid parameters coming from userspace and in that case we don't want to log an error since we do not want to give userspace a way to do a denial-of-service attack on the syslog / diskspace. So don't use soc_pcm_ret() on .prepare callback is better idea.
Source: BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF, Debian LTS Advisories, siemens_advisory, redhat_csaf, suse_csaf, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE), ENISA EUVD
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
|
|
| IBM | Security Verify Access |
|
|
| Siemens | SIMATIC S7 |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Linux | debian | linux-6.1 | bullseye |
| Linux | linux | linux_kernel | 6.5 |
| Linux | linux | linux_kernel | — |
References & sources
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/79b8c7c93beb4f5882c9ee5b9ba73354fa4bc9ee
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/90778f31efdf44622065ebbe8d228284104bd26f
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/8ec4e8c8e142933eaa8e1ed87168831069250e4e
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/301c26a018acb94dd537a4418cefa0f654500c6f
- lists.debian.orgdebian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00028.html
- Siemens ProductCERTproductcert/html/ssa-784472.html
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedLinux
New references:Show 12 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/301c26a018acb94dd537a4418cefa0f654500c6fReference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/79b8c7c93beb4f5882c9ee5b9ba73354fa4bc9eeReference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ec4e8c8e142933eaa8e1ed87168831069250e4eReference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/90778f31efdf44622065ebbe8d228284104bd26fReference removed https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/301c26a018acb94dd537a4418cefa0f654500c6f—Reference removed https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/79b8c7c93beb4f5882c9ee5b9ba73354fa4bc9ee—Reference removed https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ec4e8c8e142933eaa8e1ed87168831069250e4e—Reference removed https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/90778f31efdf44622065ebbe8d228284104bd26f—Reference type removed https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/301c26a018acb94dd537a4418cefa0f654500c6f Types: Patch—Reference type removed https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/79b8c7c93beb4f5882c9ee5b9ba73354fa4bc9ee Types: Patch—Reference type removed https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8ec4e8c8e142933eaa8e1ed87168831069250e4e Types: Patch—Reference type removed https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/90778f31efdf44622065ebbe8d228284104bd26f Types: Patch—Source identifier: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
Record modifiedCVE Program
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference added —https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00028.htmlReference removed https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00028.html—Source identifier: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Record modifiedSiemens ADP
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) added —New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2024/58xxx/CVE-2024-58077.json">CVE-2024-58077</a>Reference added —https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-784472.htmlSource identifier: 0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2024-58077"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2024-58077.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2024-58077 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>