CriticalCVE-2024-55550

    Mitel MiCollab Path Traversal Vulnerability (CVE-2024-55550)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: NCSC NZ, pwn.watch, CVE.org

    What is affected, what to do

    Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP2 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privilege to conduct a local file read, due to insufficient input sanitization. A successful exploit could allow the authenticated admin attacker to access resources that are constrained to the admin access level, and the disclosure is limited to non-sensitive system information.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • Mitel MiCollab lte *..9.8.1.201

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    4.4

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3

    2.7

    CVSS v3

    Severity Low on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: NCSC NZ, pwn.watch, CVE.org

    38.2 %

    EPSS score

    Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 98.6

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    223.32 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab), NCSC NZ How we classify
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    4.4 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    2.7
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    38.2 %
    Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    98.6
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · automatable · Technical impact: partial
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 10 January 2025
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-22

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    Despite the modest CVSS on paper, this CVE sits on KEV because, chained with CVE-2024-41713, it enables unauthenticated remote arbitrary-file reads — the admin precondition effectively disappears. CISA additionally flags it as used in ransomware campaigns, which maps to initial-access-broker activity against exposed unified-communications gateways. Its exploitation likelihood ranks among the highest in the KEV catalogue. Treat the patch with the same urgency you would give an unauthenticated RCE whenever the MiCollab portal is reachable from the internet, directly or indirectly; even on fully internal deployments it remains a high-priority item because of its lateral-movement value through credential and configuration disclosure.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Confirm whether Mitel MiCollab 9.8 SP2 or earlier (up to and including 9.8.1.201) is running anywhere in the estate, including NuPoint, AWV, client and server components. Cross-check CMDB with an active scan on TCP/443 and 8443.
      • Apply Mitel Security Advisory MISA-2024-0029: upgrade to MiCollab 9.8 SP3 or later per the current vendor advisory. For managed-service deployments, escalate to the provider with a binding patch-window commitment inside 72 hours.
      • Immediately restrict external access to the MiCollab admin interface (NPM portal, Server Manager on TCP/443) to a dedicated admin network or VPN until patched. Because the chain with CVE-2024-41713 turns this into an unauthenticated read, internet exposure is the primary risk driver.
      • Rotate all MiCollab Server Manager and AMC connector admin credentials, especially where logs suggest exposure before 7 January 2025. Terminate active sessions via Server Manager → Users.
      • Enable a reverse-proxy or WAF rule that blocks ../, ..%2f, %2e%2e%2f and double-encoded variants on all MiCollab vhosts, with particular focus on the ReconcileWizard and npm-pwg endpoints targeted by the CVE-2024-41713 chain.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Network segmentation: place MiCollab servers in a dedicated voice VLAN with explicit egress allowlisting. Admin access only via a jump host with MFA; no direct reachability from user subnets to TCP/443.
      • WAF / reverse proxy: path-traversal signature on URI and query string plus a deny-list for the known vulnerable endpoints (/npm-pwg/, ReconcileWizard, getFile, getLogs). Enable request normalisation to collapse double encoding before pattern matching.
      • Admin account hardening: minimise admin role membership, eliminate shared admin accounts, enforce password length ≥ 16 characters plus MFA via an external IdP (SAML) where supported. The flaw requires admin rights, so every shared-account abuse becomes a direct lever.
      • Filesystem hardening: restrict readability of sensitive files (/etc/shadow, /opt/mitel/ config, keystore files) to the service account; enforce SELinux or AppArmor profiles for the MiCollab web process where the appliance allows it.
      • Increase local log retention on the MiCollab server to at least 90 days and forward access logs via syslog to the central SIEM so that evidence survives any post-exploitation cleanup by an admin-level attacker.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Web access log (Apache/Tomcat on the MiCollab server): hunt for patterns such as GET .*(\.\./|%2e%2e%2f|%252e%252e%252f).* on 443/8443. Sigma shape: selection: cs-uri-stem|contains: ['../', '%2e%2e'] → high-severity alert.
      • Chain indicator: HTTP requests to ReconcileWizard or npm-pwg without a preceding successful admin login tied to the same session cookie — a strong signal of chaining with CVE-2024-41713.
      • Admin login monitoring: Server Manager logins from unusual source IPs, especially outside the admin VLAN or outside business hours. KQL shape: MitelAuditLog | where EventType == "AdminLogin" and SourceIP !in (AdminSubnets).
      • Linux auditd on the appliance: web-server UID reading paths outside /opt/mitel/www/ (e.g. /etc/, /root/, /var/log/). Watch rule: -w /etc -p r -k mitel_traversal.
      • Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): signature on HTTP URIs containing more than three ../ sequences targeting MiCollab IPs; complement with a Suricata rule combining Mitel user-agent patterns and traversal payloads.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP2 could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privilege to conduct a local file read, due to insufficient input sanitization. A successful exploit could allow the authenticated admin attacker to access resources that are constrained to the admin access level, and the disclosure is limited to non-sensitive system information. This vulnerability does not allow file modification or privilege escalation.

    Source: NCSC NZ (CC BY 4.0), pwn.watch, CISA KEV Catalog, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE)

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    mitelmicollab
    • ≤ 9.8.1.201
    • —

    Vendors and products

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-22Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

      Base

      The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-22

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited
    NCSC NZActive exploitation affecting Mitel MiCollab (opens in a new tab)NCSC NZactively exploited
    NCSC NZDNU Active exploitation affecting Mitel MiCollab (opens in a new tab)NCSC NZactively exploited

    References & sources

    • mitel.comsupport/security-advisories
    • mitel.comMitel advisory: Mitel MiCollabpwn-watch
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2024-55550government-resource
    • pwn.watchpwn.watch: Mitel MiCollab: 2 exploited vulnerabilities (CVE-2024-41713, CVE-2024-55550)pwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2024-41713pwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2024-55550pwn-watch
    • cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2024-55550
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2024-55550"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2024-55550.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2024-55550 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>