Windows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability (CVE-2024-38217)
Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: pwn.watch, Msrc Update Guide, CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
Windows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507 to version 10.0.10240.20766, Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607 to version 10.0.14393.7336, Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809 to version 10.0.17763.6293. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507
lt 10.0.10240.0..10.0.10240.20766 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607
lt 10.0.14393.0..10.0.14393.7336 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809
lt 10.0.17763.0..10.0.17763.6293 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21H2
lt 10.0.19043.0..10.0.19044.4894 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 22H2
lt 10.0.19045.0..10.0.19045.4894 - Microsoft Windows 11 version 21H2
lt 10.0.0..10.0.22000.3197 - Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H2
lt 10.0.22621.0..10.0.22621.4169 - Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H3
lt 10.0.22631.0..10.0.22631.4169 - Microsoft Windows 11 Version 23H2
lt 10.0.22631.0..10.0.22631.4169 - Microsoft Windows 11 Version 24H2
lt 10.0.26100.0..10.0.26100.1742 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2
lt 6.0.6003.0..6.0.6003.22870 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1
lt 6.1.7601.0..6.1.7601.27320 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)
lt 6.1.7601.0..6.1.7601.27320 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)
lt 6.0.6003.0..6.0.6003.22870 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012
lt 6.2.9200.0..6.2.9200.25073 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)
lt 6.2.9200.0..6.2.9200.25073 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2
lt 6.3.9600.0..6.3.9600.22175 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
lt 6.3.9600.0..6.3.9600.22175 - Microsoft Windows Server 2016
lt 10.0.14393.0..10.0.14393.7336 - Microsoft Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)
lt 10.0.14393.0..10.0.14393.7336 - Microsoft Windows Server 2019
lt 10.0.17763.0..10.0.17763.6293 - Microsoft Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)
lt 10.0.17763.0..10.0.17763.6293 - Microsoft Windows Server 2022
lt 10.0.20348.0..10.0.20348.2700 - Microsoft Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)
lt 10.0.25398.0..10.0.25398.1128
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507
- Fixed in
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507
10.0.10240.20766 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607
10.0.14393.7336 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809
10.0.17763.6293 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21H2
10.0.19044.4894 - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 22H2
10.0.19045.4894 - Microsoft Windows 11 version 21H2
10.0.22000.3197 - Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H2
10.0.22621.4169 - Microsoft Windows 11 version 22H3
10.0.22631.4169 - Microsoft Windows 11 Version 23H2
10.0.22631.4169 - Microsoft Windows 11 Version 24H2
10.0.26100.1742 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2
6.0.6003.22870 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1
6.1.7601.27320 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)
6.1.7601.27320 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)
6.0.6003.22870 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012
6.2.9200.25073 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)
6.2.9200.25073 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2
6.3.9600.22175 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
6.3.9600.22175 - Microsoft Windows Server 2016
10.0.14393.7336 - Microsoft Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)
10.0.14393.7336 - Microsoft Windows Server 2019
10.0.17763.6293 - Microsoft Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)
10.0.17763.6293 - Microsoft Windows Server 2022
10.0.20348.2700 - Microsoft Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)
10.0.25398.1128
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
5.4
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
5.4
CVSS v3
Severity Medium on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: pwn.watch, Msrc Update Guide, CVE.org
10.0 %
EPSS score
Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 95.6
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 206.32 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploited
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 5.4 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 5.4
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 10.0 %
- Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 95.6
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: partial
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 11 September 2024
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-693
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
The flaw is triggered remotely by an unauthenticated attacker but requires user interaction. Its direct impact is limited; its value to attackers is that it defeats SmartScreen, Smart App Control and Office Protected View. That makes it a standard building block in phishing and drive-by chains for initial access and payload delivery. Its exploitation likelihood is very high compared with other CVEs. CISA does not flag known ransomware use, but as an initial-access enabler it remains relevant to ransomware intrusions. Organisations with large client fleets and heavy email exposure should treat it as high priority and close it within an emergency patch window of a few days. Server-only segments without interactive users can be scheduled behind those clients.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Deploy the September 2024 cumulative security update to all affected Windows clients. Target builds per the advisory: Windows 10 1507 ≥ 10.0.10240.20766, 1607 ≥ 10.0.14393.7336, 1809 ≥ 10.0.17763.6293, 21H2 ≥ 10.0.19044.4894, 22H2 ≥ 10.0.19045.4894, Windows 11 21H2 ≥ 10.0.22000.3197, 22H2 ≥ 10.0.22621.4169, 23H2/"22H3" ≥ 10.0.22631.4169. Look up the matching KB ID per build in the Microsoft Security Update Guide.
- Pull patch compliance from Intune, WSUS, SCCM or your EDR inventory and tag anything below the target build as high risk. Patch mail- and browser-heavy endpoints first, such as office staff, finance and HR.
- Block or quarantine
.lnkfiles at the mail gateway and web proxy now. Include LNKs nested in ZIP, 7z, RAR, ISO, IMG and VHD containers. The bypass relies on crafted shortcut files that lose their Zone.Identifier when opened. - Hunt back 30 days for delivered LNK attachments and downloads. Treat any hit followed by script or LOLBin execution as an incident: isolate the host and reset the user's credentials.
- Brief users and the service desk that SmartScreen and Protected View prompts may silently fail on unpatched systems. A missing warning on those systems does not mean the file is safe.
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Mail/web filtering: Block the file types
.lnk,.url,.hta,.js,.jse,.vbs,.vbe,.wsfand.scf, with archive and disk-image inspection enabled. Block container formats (ISO, IMG, VHD) outright unless there is a business need. - Endpoint hardening (Defender ASR): Enforce the following rules in block mode:
- "Block JavaScript or VBScript from launching downloaded executable content"
- "Block execution of potentially obfuscated scripts"
- "Block Office applications from creating child processes"
- "Block executable files from running unless they meet a prevalence, age, or trusted list criterion"
- Office configuration independent of MOTW: Set VBA macros to "Disable all except digitally signed macros" via GPO or Intune. Do not rely solely on the MOTW-driven internet macro block, because that is exactly the tagging being bypassed.
- Application control: Use WDAC or AppLocker to deny script and binary execution from user-writable paths, including
%USERPROFILE%\Downloads,%TEMP%and%APPDATA%. Restrictmshta.exe,wscript.exeandcscript.exefor standard users. - File associations: Remap
.js,.vbs,.htaand.wsfto Notepad via GPO so that a double-click opens the file instead of executing it. - Least privilege: Remove local admin rights from standard users to limit the blast radius of a successful initial execution.
- Mail/web filtering: Block the file types
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Sysmon EID 11 / MDE DeviceFileEvents – LNK rewrite by Explorer:
explorer.exewrites or modifies a.lnkin Downloads or Temp paths. This is a characteristic artefact of the bypass, because the file is rewritten and the Zone.Identifier is dropped.DeviceFileEvents | where FileName endswith ".lnk" and InitiatingProcessFileName =~ "explorer.exe" and ActionType in ("FileModified","FileCreated") and FolderPath has_any (@"\Downloads\", @"\AppData\Local\Temp\") - Sysmon EID 15 (FileCreateStreamHash): A
Zone.Identifierstream is created for a file, and shortly afterwards the same file reappears rewritten without the ADS. Correlate the two events onTargetFilename. - Process ancestry (EDR, Sysmon EID 1, Security 4688 with command line):
explorer.exespawnspowershell.exe,cmd.exe,mshta.exe,wscript.exe,cscript.exe,rundll32.exeorconhost.exewith network or encoding arguments.DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName =~ "explorer.exe" and FileName in~ ("powershell.exe","mshta.exe","wscript.exe","cscript.exe","rundll32.exe","cmd.exe") and ProcessCommandLine has_any ("http","-enc","FromBase64String","iwr","curl") - Sigma shape:
logsource: process_creation,ParentImage|endswith: \explorer.exe,Image|endswithin the LOLBin list,CommandLine|contains.lnkor download patterns. AddCurrentDirectory|contains: \Downloads\. - Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata/proxy): Look for HTTP downloads with MIME type
application/x-ms-shortcutand LNK magic bytes4C 00 00 00 01 14 02 00in file extraction. Flag outbound connections from the same client to newly registered domains immediately afterwards.
- Sysmon EID 11 / MDE DeviceFileEvents – LNK rewrite by Explorer:
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Windows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability
Source: pwn.watch, Microsoft Security Update Guide, CISA KEV Catalog, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1507 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1607 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1809 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 21H2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 22H2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 version 21H2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 version 22H2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 version 22H3 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 Version 23H2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows 11 Version 24H2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 R2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2019 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2022 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation) |
|
|
Vendors and products
- Microsoft Windows 10 1507
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 1607
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 1809
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 21H2
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 22h2
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 21h2
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 22h2
- Microsoft Windows 11 21h2
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 11 22H2
Affected operating systems
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1507 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1607 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_1809 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_21h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_10_22h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_11_21h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_11_22h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_11_23h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_11_24h2 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2008 | r2 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2008 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2012 | r2 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2012 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2016 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2019 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2022 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2022_23h2 | — |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-693Protection Mechanism Failure
Pillar
The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.
Entry at MITRE CWE-693
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited |
References & sources
- Microsoft Security Update GuideWindows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass VulnerabilityVendor advisory, Patch, pwn-watch
- elastic.cosecurity-labs/dismantling-smart-app-control
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2024-38217government-resource
- pwn.watchpwn.watch: Microsoft September 2024: 3 actively exploited zero-dayspwn-watch
- Microsoft Security Update GuideMicrosoft advisory: CVE-2024-38014pwn-watch
- Microsoft Security Update GuideMicrosoft advisory: CVE-2024-38226pwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2024-38014pwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2024-38217pwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2024-38226pwn-watch
- cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedMicrosoft
1 individual change: Affected versions (publisher)
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) changed Windows 10 Version 1809, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) (+22)Windows 10 Version 1507, Windows 10 Version 1607, Windows 10 Version 1809 (+22)Source identifier: secure@microsoft.com
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2024-38217"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2024-38217.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2024-38217 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>