CriticalCVE-2024-28995

    SolarWinds Serv-U L Directory Transversal Vulnerability (CVE-2024-28995)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org, SingCERT, pwn.watch

    What is affected, what to do

    SolarWinds Serv-U was susceptible to a directory transversal vulnerability that would allow access to read sensitive files on the host machine.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update serv-u to version 15.4.2. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • SolarWinds Serv-U eq 15.4.2 HF 1 and previous versions..15.4.2 HF 1 and previous versions

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    8.6

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3

    8.6

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: CVE.org, SingCERT, pwn.watch

    99.61 %

    EPSS score

    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.95

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    228.28 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploited
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    8.6 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    8.6
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    99.61 %
    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    99.95
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · automatable · Technical impact: partial
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 17 July 2024
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-22

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    The flaw is unauthenticated and network-reachable, public exploits and Metasploit modules have been available since June 2024, and EPSS places this among the CVEs most likely to be exploited — opportunistic internet-wide scanning of TCP 443/80 is a baseline condition. The primary damage pattern is theft of credentials and keys from configuration files, which attackers then use as an initial-access pivot into the internal estate; CISA does not currently flag it for a named ransomware campaign, but data theft with follow-on extortion is the realistic scenario. For NIS2-regulated operators running an internet-facing Serv-U instance this is a P1 incident precursor — patch within 24 h, and emergency perimeter shutdown is justified if the patch window slips.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Deploy SolarWinds Serv-U 15.4.2 HF 2 (or later) — the vendor fix for CVE-2024-28995. Schedule downtime for the FTP/SFTP/HTTP services (TCP 21, 22, 80, 443, management 443/6443) and fully restart the Serv-U process after upgrade.
      • Until patched: remove the Serv-U web interface and FTP services from the public internet or restrict them at the firewall to known administrative source IPs. The traversal via GET /?InternalDir=...&InternalFile=... is trivially reachable over HTTP/HTTPS and is being actively exploited.
      • Review the Serv-U service account on the host and drop it to least privilege (not local admin, not SYSTEM, not Domain Admin). Read access is bounded by this account's permissions — any over-privileged configuration dramatically widens the blast radius.
      • Retrospectively search Serv-U access logs (DebugSocketLog.txt, HTTP logs) for the last 60 days for traversal patterns (../, ..\, %2e%2e, \..\..\). Any hit opens an IR ticket: identify the files readable on the host and treat them as potentially exfiltrated.
      • Rotate credentials, SSH keys, API tokens and certificates that were readable from the Serv-U host — especially /etc/passwd, Serv-U configs containing DB credentials, Windows registry hives, private keys under C:\ProgramData\RhinoSoft\Serv-U\.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Network segmentation: place Serv-U in a dedicated DMZ VLAN, egress-whitelist only required backend destinations (AD, SMB shares, logging). No lateral SMB/WinRM path to internal file servers.
      • WAF or reverse proxy in front of Serv-U HTTP: block requests containing InternalDir or InternalFile query parameters, plus patterns ..%2f, ..%5c, %252e%252e. ModSecurity example: SecRule REQUEST_URI "@rx (?i)(\.\.(/|\\|%2f|%5c)){2,}" "id:928100,phase:1,deny,log".
      • Enable IPS/IDS signatures: Emerging Threats ships SIDs for CVE-2024-28995. Load the Suricata/Snort rules on all perimeter sensors and set them to drop, not alert-only.
      • Host hardening: isolate sensitive files (private keys, web.config, SAM, /etc/shadow) from the Serv-U process context — explicitly deny read via NTFS ACL or Linux DAC. On Windows add an AppLocker/WDAC policy constraining the Serv-U process.
      • Configuration review: lock Serv-U "Virtual Paths" and "Home Directories" to absolute boundaries, enforce "Lock users in home directory" globally. Expose the admin UI only through VPN or a Zero-Trust proxy.
      • File-access monitoring: enable Windows Object Access Auditing (Event ID 4663) on critical directories; on Linux use auditd rule -w /etc/shadow -p r -k servu_sensitive.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Web access logs (Serv-U HTTP or fronting reverse proxy): matches on GET requests containing InternalDir and .. in parameters. KQL example: W3CIISLog | where csUriQuery has_any ("InternalDir","InternalFile") and csUriQuery matches regex @"\.\.(/|\\|%2f|%5c)".
      • Sigma shape: detection: selection: cs-uri-query|contains: ['InternalDir=', 'InternalFile='] filter: cs-uri-query|re: '\.\.(/|%2f|\\|%5c)' condition: selection and filter, product webserver.
      • Sysmon EID 1 (Process Create) and EID 11 (File Create) on the Serv-U host: unexpected reads by Serv-U.exe / Serv-U-Tray.exe to paths outside its configured home-directory tree.
      • Windows Event ID 4663 against C:\Windows\System32\config\SAM, *.pfx, *.key, web.config with accessing process = Serv-U — unambiguous exploitation signal.
      • Netflow or Zeek: unusual outbound data volume from the Serv-U host immediately after HTTP requests carrying traversal patterns (correlate request-payload size against egress peak within 60 seconds).
      • Retrospective hunt: look for public-exploit user agents (curl/, python-requests/, empty UA) hitting Serv-U URIs over the past 90 days.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    SolarWinds Serv-U was susceptible to a directory transversal vulnerability that would allow access to read sensitive files on the host machine.

    Source: cvelistv5, CSA/SingCERT, pwn.watch, NVD (NIST), CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    SolarWindsSolarWinds Serv-U
    • 15.4.2 HF 1 and previous versions
    • —
    solarwindsserv-u
    • < 15.4.2
    • 15.4.2
    • 15.4.2
    • —

    Vendors and products

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-22Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

      Base

      The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-22

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited

    References & sources

    • solarwinds.comSolarWinds advisory: CVE-2024-28995Vendor advisory, Vendor advisory, pwn-watch
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2024-28995government-resource, US government resource
    • pwn.watchpwn.watch: SolarWinds Serv-U Path Traversalpwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2024-28995pwn-watch
    • cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2024-28995
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2024-28995"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2024-28995.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2024-28995 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>