CriticalCVE-2024-28987

    SolarWinds Web Help Desk Hardcoded Credential Vulnerability (CVE-2024-28987)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: pwn.watch, CVE.org

    What is affected, what to do

    The SolarWinds Web Help Desk (WHD) software is affected by a hardcoded credential vulnerability, allowing remote unauthenticated user to access internal functionality and modify data.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update web_help_desk to version 12.8.3. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • SolarWinds Web Help Desk eq 12.8.3 Hotfix 1 and previous versions..12.8.3 Hotfix 1 and previous versions

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    9.1

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    9.1

    CVSS v3

    Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: pwn.watch, CVE.org

    93.3 %

    EPSS score

    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.84

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    231.32 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploited
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    9.1 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    9.1
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    93.3 %
    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    99.84
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-798

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    This flaw is network-reachable with no authentication and no user interaction. The hardcoded username and endpoint layout are publicly documented, so exploitation is trivial and the CVE ranks among those most likely to be exploited. Attackers read and alter ticket data, which routinely holds passwords, network details and configuration notes. WHD also makes a natural pivot point, either through its stored AD and mail credentials or by chaining with CVE-2024-28986 for code execution. CISA does not flag known ransomware use, but treat any internet-facing WHD as critical with a 24-hour patch deadline. Internal-only instances are still high priority, particularly in KRITIS environments where helpdesk tickets carry operational detail.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Cut exposure first: Check whether your Web Help Desk (WHD) instance is reachable from the internet. It typically runs on Tomcat at 8081/HTTP or 8443/HTTPS, though custom installs may differ. Block external access at the perimeter, or restrict it to VPN or known source ranges, until patching is complete.
      • Apply the vendor hotfix: All versions up to and including 12.8.3 Hotfix 1 are affected. Upgrade to 12.8.3 Hotfix 2 or later, and check the SolarWinds advisory for installation prerequisites such as a required prior hotfix level. Confirm the running version in the admin console afterwards.
      • Close the chained risk: Ensure the fix for the WHD Java deserialization flaw CVE-2024-28986 (also on KEV) is in place. Access to internal functionality makes chaining the two flaws attractive to attackers.
      • Preserve evidence before patching: Collect the WHD Tomcat access logs and application logs before updates or restarts rotate them. Then hunt for requests to /helpdesk/WebObjects/Helpdesk.woa/ra/OrionTickets.
      • Rotate secrets: If the instance was exposed or the logs look suspicious, rotate every secret stored in WHD. That covers the LDAP/AD bind account, SMTP/IMAP mailbox credentials, the database account, integration API keys (e.g. Orion), and any passwords users have pasted into tickets.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Network segmentation: Place WHD in a dedicated server segment. Allow inbound traffic only from client VLANs or through an authenticating reverse proxy. Restrict outbound traffic to the services WHD actually needs (mail, LDAP, DB) to limit post-compromise pivoting.
      • WAF/reverse-proxy rule: Block external requests to /helpdesk/WebObjects/Helpdesk.woa/ra/OrionTickets if you don't use the Orion integration. If you do, allow that path only from the Orion server's IP. Additionally, drop Authorization: Basic headers on /ra/ paths from untrusted networks.
      • IPS signature: Write a Suricata rule that alerts on HTTP URI /ra/OrionTickets combined with an Authorization: Basic header. For TLS traffic, enforce it at the proxy or load balancer where traffic is decrypted.
      • Host hardening: Run the WHD service under a non-privileged service account. Use application control or EDR policy to block, or at minimum alert on, child processes of the Java/Tomcat process (cmd.exe, powershell.exe, /bin/sh).
      • Least privilege (IAM): Limit the AD bind account configured in WHD to read-only rights, with no domain admin or write permissions. Periodically scrub tickets for cleartext credentials.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Web/Tomcat access logs: Look for requests to /helpdesk/WebObjects/Helpdesk.woa/ra/OrionTickets from any source other than your Orion server. PUT/POST/DELETE methods (data tampering) and burst volumes are especially suspicious. SPL: index=web uri_path="*/ra/OrionTickets*" NOT src_ip=<orion_ip> | stats count by src_ip, http_method
      • Integration-account usage: Watch application or proxy log entries showing the publicly known username helpdeskIntegrationUser. Treat any use outside the documented Orion integration as compromise.
      • EDR process ancestry (Sysmon EID 1 / Windows 4688): Alert when the WHD Java/Tomcat process spawns cmd.exe, powershell.exe, whoami.exe or certutil.exe. On Linux, watch for sh/bash via auditd execve with the Java process as parent. Sigma shape: ParentImage|endswith: '\java.exe' AND Image|endswith: ['\cmd.exe','\powershell.exe'], scoped to WHD hosts.
      • Data tampering: Use the WHD audit trail and DB logs to spot bulk ticket edits or deletions, new technician or admin accounts, and changed email/LDAP configuration.
      • Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): Flag new outbound connections from the WHD server to unfamiliar external IPs, which may indicate exfiltration or C2. Also flag the WHD bind account authenticating from hosts other than WHD (Windows 4624/4625), which suggests stolen credentials are being reused.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    The SolarWinds Web Help Desk (WHD) software is affected by a hardcoded credential vulnerability, allowing remote unauthenticated user to access internal functionality and modify data.

    Source: pwn.watch, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    SolarWindsWeb Help Desk
    • 12.8.3 Hotfix 1 and previous versions
    • —
    solarwindsweb_help_desk
    • 12.8.3
    • < 12.8.3
    • —
    • 12.8.3

    Vendors and products

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-798Use of Hard-coded Credentials

      Base

      The product contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-798

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited
    PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec)CVE-2024-28987 (opens in a new tab)github.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified

    References & sources

    • solarwinds.comSolarWinds advisory: CVE-2024-28987Vendor advisory, pwn-watch
    • support.solarwinds.comSuccessCenter/s/article/SolarWinds-Web-Help-Desk-12-8-3-Hotfix-2Release notes
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2024-28987government-resource, US government resource
    • theregister.com2024/08/22/hardcoded_credentials_bug_solarwinds_whdPress coverage, Third-party advisory
    • pwn.watchpwn.watch: SolarWinds Web Help Desk Hardcoded Credentialpwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2024-28987pwn-watch
    • cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2024-28987
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2024-28987"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2024-28987.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2024-28987 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>