Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability (CVE-2024-21410)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: NCSC NZ, SingCERT, pwn.watch, CVE.org
- Actively exploited
- Source: NCSC NZ How we classify
What is affected, what to do
Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update Microsoft Exchange Server 2016 Cumulative Update 23 to version 15.01.2507.037, Microsoft Exchange Server 2019 Cumulative Update 13 to version 15.2.1544.004, Microsoft Exchange Server 2019 Cumulative Update 14 to version 15.2.1544.004. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Microsoft Exchange Server 2016 Cumulative Update 23
lt 15.01.0..15.01.2507.037 - Microsoft Exchange Server 2019 Cumulative Update 13
lt 15.02.0..15.2.1544.004 - Microsoft Exchange Server 2019 Cumulative Update 14
lt 15.02.0..15.2.1544.004
- Microsoft Exchange Server 2016 Cumulative Update 23
- Fixed in
- Microsoft Exchange Server 2016 Cumulative Update 23
15.01.2507.037 - Microsoft Exchange Server 2019 Cumulative Update 13
15.2.1544.004 - Microsoft Exchange Server 2019 Cumulative Update 14
15.2.1544.004
- Microsoft Exchange Server 2016 Cumulative Update 23
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
9.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
9.8
CVSS v3
Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: NCSC NZ, SingCERT, pwn.watch, CVE.org
12.7 %
EPSS score
Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 96.3
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 227.58 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploitedSource: NCSC NZ How we classify
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 9.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 9.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 12.7 %
- Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 96.3
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 15 February 2024
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-287
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This flaw lets an unauthenticated, network-reachable attacker relay a previously captured Net-NTLMv2 hash to Exchange and act as the victim. It extends the well-known Outlook hash-leak-plus-relay chain that has been used against government, energy and defence organisations across Europe. CISA does not flag ransomware use, but exploitation likelihood is very high and the impact on mailbox confidentiality and integrity is severe. Organisations running internet-facing on-premises Exchange, particularly critical-infrastructure operators, should treat this as critical with remediation inside 24–72 h. Internal-only servers with outbound SMB already blocked can follow the regular emergency patch cycle.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Inventory Exchange builds: Run
Get-ExchangeServer | Format-List Name,AdminDisplayVersionor the Microsoft HealthChecker (CSS-Exchange). Vulnerable builds are Exchange Server 2016 CU23 below build 15.01.2507.037 and Exchange Server 2019 CU13/CU14 below build 15.2.1544.004. - Patch: Move Exchange 2019 to CU14 (build 15.2.1544.004), which enables Extended Protection for Authentication (EPA) by default and closes the NTLM relay path. Update Exchange 2016 CU23 to build 15.01.2507.037. Look up the KB number and download in the Microsoft Security Update Guide entry for CVE-2024-21410.
- Explicitly enable and verify EPA, especially on Exchange 2016 and on servers deployed before CU14. Use Microsoft's
ExchangeExtendedProtectionManagement.ps1(CSS-Exchange). First confirm that load balancers do no SSL offloading and that TLS settings are consistent across all servers, otherwise EPA will break client connections. - Stop NTLM hash leakage: Block outbound SMB (TCP 445) and WebDAV to the internet at the perimeter. Exploitation typically relies on Net-NTLMv2 hashes harvested via crafted Outlook items with UNC paths (cf. CVE-2023-23397).
- If compromise is suspected: Reset credentials for privileged and exposed mailbox accounts, then review mailbox permissions, inbox rules, delegations and forwarding (
Get-MailboxPermission,Get-InboxRule). Assess NIS2 reporting obligations, including the 24 h early warning.
- Inventory Exchange builds: Run
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network segmentation: Publish OWA, EWS, ECP and MAPI/HTTP only through a reverse proxy or pre-authentication layer. Never expose
/ecpto the internet. Clients should not be able to open outbound SMB connections outside defined file-server VLANs. - IAM / least privilege: Add privileged accounts to "Protected Users", which blocks NTLM authentication for its members. Audit NTLM via GPO ("Network security: Restrict NTLM"), then progressively restrict it. Where feasible, allow only Kerberos or Modern Authentication (OAuth) for Outlook and EWS.
- Endpoint hardening: Fully patch Outlook clients. Run Microsoft's
CVE-2023-23397.ps1to sweep mailboxes for items carrying UNC paths inPidLidReminderFileParameter. Enforce SMB signing and LDAP signing/channel binding domain-wide. - WAF/IPS: On the reverse proxy, log internet-originated NTLM authentication (
Authorization: NTLM/Negotiatewith an NTLMSSP token) against/ews/,/owa/,/rpc/and/mapi/, and apply rate limits. External access should use Modern Authentication only. - Lifecycle: Exchange 2016 support ended in October 2025. Track migration to Exchange Server Subscription Edition or Exchange Online as a formal risk treatment.
- Network segmentation: Publish OWA, EWS, ECP and MAPI/HTTP only through a reverse proxy or pre-authentication layer. Never expose
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Windows Security log on Exchange (Event ID 4624): Flag
LogonType=3withAuthenticationPackageName=NTLMwhereWorkstationNameandIpAddressdon't match or where the source is outside known client ranges. KQL:SecurityEvent | where Computer has "EXCH" and EventID==4624 and AuthenticationPackageName=="NTLM" and LogonType==3 | summarize count() by Account, IpAddress, WorkstationName - Relay patterns: Watch for successful NTLM logons for an account, especially a privileged one, from an IP with no prior association with that user. Correlate with bursts of Event ID 4625. Once EPA is active, channel-binding-related failures point to relay attempts.
- Network (Zeek/Suricata): Check
conn.logandsmb_mapping.logfor outbound TCP 445 or WebDAV (PROPFIND, User-AgentMicrosoft-WebDAV-MiniRedir) to external IPs. Suricata:alert tcp $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET 445 (msg:"Outbound SMB – possible NTLM leak"; flow:to_server,established;) - IIS logs (
W3SVC*): Look for 200 responses on/EWS/Exchange.asmxand/mapi/following 401 NTLM challenges from unusual source IPs or user agents. Also watch for anomalous EWS volumes against single mailboxes, which suggest mail exfiltration. - Exchange admin audit / Unified Audit Log: Alert on new mailbox delegations (
Add-MailboxPermission), forwarding inbox rules andNew-ManagementRoleAssignmentoutside change windows. Sigma shape:product: windows, service: msexchange-management, keywords: [Add-MailboxPermission, New-InboxRule, New-ManagementRoleAssignment]
- Windows Security log on Exchange (Event ID 4624): Flag
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
Source: NCSC NZ (CC BY 4.0), CSA/SingCERT, pwn.watch, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Microsoft Exchange Server 2016 Cumulative Update 23 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Microsoft Exchange Server 2019 Cumulative Update 13 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Microsoft Exchange Server 2019 Cumulative Update 14 |
|
|
| microsoft | exchange_server |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-287Improper Authentication
Class
When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct.
Entry at MITRE CWE-287
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| NCSC NZ | CVEs affecting Microsoft products (opens in a new tab)NCSC NZ | actively exploited |
References & sources
- Microsoft Security Update GuideMicrosoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege VulnerabilityVendor advisory, Patch, Patch, Vendor advisory, pwn-watch
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2024-21410government-resource, US government resource
- pwn.watchpwn.watch: Microsoft Exchange Server Privilege Escalationpwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2024-21410pwn-watch
- cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2024-21410"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2024-21410.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2024-21410 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>