Command Injection Vulnerability in Remote Support (RS) & Privileged Remote Access (PRA) (CVE-2024-12356)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: pwn.watch, CVE.org, SingCERT
- Actively exploited
- Source: CSA/SingCERT How we classify
- Public exploit
What is affected, what to do
A critical vulnerability has been discovered in Privileged Remote Access (PRA) and Remote Support (RS) products which can allow an unauthenticated attacker to inject commands that are run as a site user.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- BeyondTrust Remote Support
lte *..24.3.1 - BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access
lte *..24.3.1
- BeyondTrust Remote Support
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
9.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
9.8
CVSS v3
Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: pwn.watch, CVE.org, SingCERT
87.3 %
EPSS score
High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.75
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 235.82 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploitedSource: CSA/SingCERT How we classify
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 9.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 9.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 87.3 %
- High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 99.75
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossaryCWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-77
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
The flaw is exploitable over the network without authentication or user interaction, and it sits in a product whose whole purpose is to concentrate privileged remote access to large parts of the estate. Compromise is effectively a master-key and supply-chain scenario. Exploitation likelihood ranks among the highest of all known CVEs. CISA has not flagged ransomware use, but typical targets include government bodies, MSPs and organisations that use PRA/RS to reach critical systems. Treat any internet-reachable appliance as a top-priority emergency: patching and compromise assessment take precedence over normal maintenance windows.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Build an inventory: Identify every on-premises BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access (PRA) and Remote Support (RS) appliance, physical or virtual. Check the installed version via the /appliance interface. The context lists 24.3.1 as affected; treat older releases as affected until the vendor advisory says otherwise.
- Apply the patch: A patch is available from the vendor — look up the exact version in the vendor advisory. Install it via the /appliance interface or the BeyondTrust customer portal. For SaaS instances, get written confirmation from the vendor that your instance has been updated.
- Cut exposure: If you cannot patch within hours, restrict access to the appliance web interface (typically TCP 443) to known source ranges. Alternatively, take the appliance offline temporarily and arrange an alternative emergency remote-access path.
- Check for compromise before returning to service: Preserve appliance logs (session, audit and configuration changes) going back to at least early December 2024. Hunt for unknown users, API accounts and newly registered Jump Clients.
- Rotate secrets: Rotate API keys, integration credentials (LDAP/SAML bind accounts), vault credentials and local admin passwords stored on the appliance. The appliance brokers privileged access — if in doubt, assume those secrets were exfiltrated.
- Check reporting duties: If compromise is suspected, trigger your NIS2/KRITIS reporting process (24 h early warning to the BSI/national CSIRT).
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network segmentation: Run the appliance in a dedicated DMZ. Allow outbound traffic from the appliance only to defined destinations (Jump Client networks, vendor update servers) and default-deny everything else. This frustrates reverse shells and data exfiltration.
- Front-door access control: Put the representative/admin interfaces (/login, /appliance) behind VPN or ZTNA with MFA. Expose only the customer-facing portal functions that genuinely need to be public, and geo/IP-restrict those where possible.
- WAF/IPS: Place a reverse proxy/WAF in front of the appliance. Block or alert on requests and WebSocket upgrades carrying shell metacharacters (
;,|,`,$(,&&) in parameters or handshake fields. Enable vendor IPS signatures for CVE-2024-12356 where available. - IAM/least privilege: Scope Jump Client groups and session policies so that a compromised site account cannot reach every endpoint. For tier-0 assets (domain controllers, OT engineering workstations), additionally require session approval by a second person.
- Endpoint hardening: On hosts with Jump Clients, use an EDR rule to prevent the Jump Client process from spawning script interpreters outside an approved, active session.
- Configuration: Disable unused API accounts and integrations. Enable syslog forwarding from the appliance to the SIEM if it is not already on.
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata/firewall): Alert on new outbound connections from the appliance IP to non-allowlisted destinations, especially on non-standard ports. KQL example:
CommonSecurityLog | where SourceIP == "<appliance_ip>" and DestinationIP !in (allowlist) | summarize count() by DestinationIP, DestinationPort - Appliance audit log via syslog: Creation of new local users or API accounts, permission changes and password resets outside change windows. Sigma shape:
logsource: beyondtrust_syslog; selection: event in ('user_created','api_account_created','permission_changed'); condition: selection and not change_window. - Web access logs (reverse proxy/WAF): Unusual WebSocket upgrade requests from unknown source IPs, and requests containing encoded shell metacharacters (
%3B,%7C,%60,%24%28). Also watch for bursts of error responses immediately preceding successful requests, which indicate exploit probing. - Endpoint EDR/Sysmon EID 1: Process chains where the Jump Client is the parent and
cmd.exe,powershell.exe,rundll32.exeorcertutil.exeis the child, particularly with no corresponding logged session. SPL:index=sysmon EventCode=1 ParentImage="*bomgar-scc*" (Image="*\\powershell.exe" OR Image="*\\cmd.exe") | stats count by host, CommandLine - Session correlation: Remote sessions at odd hours, to unusual targets or by unfamiliar representative accounts. Reconcile appliance session reports against endpoint logon events (Windows Event ID 4624, logon type 10/3).
- Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata/firewall): Alert on new outbound connections from the appliance IP to non-allowlisted destinations, especially on non-standard ports. KQL example:
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
A critical vulnerability has been discovered in Privileged Remote Access (PRA) and Remote Support (RS) products which can allow an unauthenticated attacker to inject commands that are run as a site user.
Source: pwn.watch, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE), CSA/SingCERT
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| BeyondTrust | Privileged Remote Access |
|
|
| BeyondTrust | Remote Support |
|
|
| beyondtrust | privileged_remote_access |
|
|
| beyondtrust | remote_support |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-77Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')
Class
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component.
Entry at MITRE CWE-77
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| CSA/SingCERT | Vulnerabilities in BeyondTrust Products (opens in a new tab)CSA/SingCERT | actively exploited | |
| Reference tagged as exploit | attackerkb.com (opens in a new tab) | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2024-12356 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified |
References & sources
- CVE.org (MITRE)CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12356Third-party advisory, US government resource
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2024-12356Third-party advisory, US government resource, pwn-watch
- beyondtrust.comBT24-10: command injection in Remote Support and Privileged Remote AccessVendor advisory, pwn-watch
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2024-12356government-resource, US government resource
- attackerkb.comtopics/G5s8ZWAbYH/cve-2024-12356/rapid7-analysisExploit, Third-party advisory
- pwn.watchpwn.watch: BeyondTrust Remote Support breach reaches US Treasury (CVE-2024-12356)pwn-watch
- beyondtrust.comRemote Support SaaS service security investigationpwn-watch
- s3.documentcloud.orgTreasury letter to the Senate Banking Committee on the December 2024 cyberattackpwn-watch
- bleepingcomputer.comUS Treasury Department breached through remote support platformpwn-watch
- cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2024-12356"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2024-12356.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2024-12356 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>