CriticalCVE-2024-11680

    ProjectSend Unauthenticated Configuration Modification (CVE-2024-11680)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: pwn.watch, CVE.org

    Share

    What is affected, what to do

    An unauthenticated attacker can exploit an improper authentication vulnerability in ProjectSend versions prior to r1720 to gain full control of the application. By sending crafted HTTP requests to options.php, attackers can modify the application's configuration, create accounts, upload webshells, and embed malicious JavaScript. This vulnerability is actively exploited in the wild. All versions of ProjectSend before r1720 are affected. It is imperative to update to version r1720 or later to mitigate this risk.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update ProjectSend to version r1720. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • ProjectSend lt *..r1720
    Fixed in
    • ProjectSend r1720

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    9.8

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    9.8

    CVSS v3

    Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: pwn.watch, CVE.org

    91.9 %

    EPSS score

    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.82

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    235.60 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploited
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    9.8 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    9.8
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    91.9 %
    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    99.82
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 6 December 2024
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-306

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    The flaw is network-reachable with no authentication and no user interaction. It gives full compromise with trivial effort: rewrite the configuration, allow PHP uploads, drop a webshell. Public exploits and scanner templates exist, and exploitation likelihood ranks among the very highest of any CVE, so expect mass scanning of exposed instances. Typical victims run ProjectSend as a self-hosted file-exchange portal for clients, authorities or suppliers. These portals often hold confidential documents that are attractive for exfiltration and extortion, even though CISA does not flag ransomware use. Treat any internet-facing instance below r1720 as critical with a sub-24-hour remediation deadline, and assume it is compromised until proven otherwise. Internal-only instances are high priority but come second.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Inventory: Find every ProjectSend instance, including shadow IT run by business units or vendors. Use the asset inventory, web server vhosts, or search for the ProjectSend login page and options.php. Check the installed revision. Anything before r1720 is vulnerable.
      • Patch: Upgrade to ProjectSend r1720 or later. If you cannot do this within hours, pull the instance off the internet (reverse-proxy deny, firewall block on 80/443) or restrict access to known partner IP ranges.
      • Hunt for compromise before patching: Patching does not remove an implanted webshell. Snapshot and review the following before and after the upgrade:
        • tbl_options: unexpectedly enabled client self-registration or auto-approval, allowed file extensions widened to php, phtml or phar, a changed site title, or injected JavaScript.
        • tbl_users: recently created accounts.
      • Webshell sweep: Search upload/files/ and upload/temp/ for executable files (*.php*, *.phtml, *.phar) and look for recently modified files anywhere in the webroot.
      • If you find anything, switch to incident mode:
        • Isolate the host and preserve evidence (disk, web logs, DB dump).
        • Reset all ProjectSend admin and client passwords.
        • Rotate the database credentials in includes/sys.config.php and the SMTP credentials.
        • Scope which shared files may have been exfiltrated. This drives your GDPR and NIS2 notification decisions.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Network segmentation: Do not expose ProjectSend directly. Front it with a reverse proxy that enforces pre-authentication (SSO/IdP, mTLS or VPN). Restrict outbound traffic from the web host to what is required (SMTP, updates) to hamper reverse shells and second-stage downloads.
      • WAF/reverse-proxy rule:
        • Allow /options.php only from the admin management network, e.g. nginx location = /options.php { allow 10.0.10.0/24; deny all; }.
        • Also block POSTs to options.php that lack a previously issued, valid session cookie.
      • Web server hardening: Disable PHP execution in the upload directory.
        • nginx: location ^~ /upload/ { location ~ \.ph(p|tml|ar)$ { deny all; } }
        • Apache: php_admin_flag engine off or <FilesMatch "\.ph">Require all denied</FilesMatch>
        • Ideally, move uploads outside the webroot.
      • Application configuration:
        • Disable client self-registration and auto-approval.
        • Restrict allowed file types to an allowlist without script formats.
        • Scope the ProjectSend DB account to its own schema.
      • Integrity monitoring: Run FIM (Wazuh/OSSEC, AIDE) on the webroot and upload directory. Add a scheduled diff of tbl_options against an approved baseline (hash of option values).
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Web access logs: POSTs to /options.php from source IPs with no prior successful login (POST /index.php returning 302 to the dashboard). The typical chain is GET options.php (CSRF token harvest) → POST options.php → registration → upload. SPL sketch: index=web uri_path="/options.php" method=POST | stats count by src_ip | join type=left src_ip [search index=web uri_path="/index.php" method=POST status=302]
      • Requests to executable uploads: Requests under /upload/ ending in .php, .phtml or .phar, especially with parameters such as cmd= or c=. Sigma shape: cs-uri-stem|contains: '/upload/' AND cs-uri-stem|endswith: ['.php','.phtml','.phar'].
      • EDR/Sysmon process ancestry: A web server or PHP process (apache2, httpd, php-fpm, nginx, w3wp.exe, php-cgi.exe) spawning shells or recon tools (sh, bash, cmd.exe, powershell.exe, whoami, id, uname, curl, wget). Sources: Sysmon EID 1 (ParentImage) or auditd execve events whose parent is the web server user.
      • File creation: New script files under upload/ written by the web server user, visible in Sysmon EID 11 or via an auditd watch (-w /var/www/projectsend/upload -p wa -k ps_upload).
      • Application and DB layer:
        • New rows in tbl_users outside change windows.
        • Modifications to tbl_options (registration, file types, site title).
        • <script> fragments in option values.
        • Review via tbl_actions_log or the MySQL general/audit log.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    ProjectSend versions prior to r1720 are affected by an improper authentication vulnerability. Remote, unauthenticated attackers can exploit this flaw by sending crafted HTTP requests to options.php, enabling unauthorized modification of the application's configuration. Successful exploitation allows attackers to create accounts, upload webshells, and embed malicious JavaScript.

    Source: pwn.watch, cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE)

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    ProjectSendProjectSend
    • —
    • —
    projectsendprojectsend
    • < r1720
    • r1720

    Vendors and products

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-306Missing Authentication for Critical Function

      Base

      The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-306

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited
    Metasploit FrameworkMetasploit: exploits/linux/http/projectsend_unauth_rce (opens in a new tab)github.comweaponized (Metasploit module)reported, not verified—
    Nuclei Templates (ProjectDiscovery)Nuclei: projectsend-auth-bypass (opens in a new tab)github.comfunctional (detection template)reported, not verified—

    References & sources

    • github.comProjectSend advisory: CVE-2024-11680Patch, pwn-watch
    • synacktiv.comsites/default/files/2024-07/synacktiv-projectsend-multiple-vuln…Third-party advisory, Exploit
    • github.comrapid7/metasploit-framework/blob/master/modules/exploits/linux/…Exploit
    • github.comprojectdiscovery/nuclei-templates/blob/main/http/vulnerabilitie…Exploit
    • vulncheck.comadvisories/projectsend-bypassThird-party advisory
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2024-11680government-resource
    • pwn.watchpwn.watch: ProjectSend Improper Authenticationpwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2024-11680pwn-watch
    • cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2024-11680
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2024-11680"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2024-11680.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2024-11680 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>