Gnutls: rejects certificate chain with distributed trust (CVE-2024-0567)
Published Last modified Sources: Siemens ProductCERT, Red Hat, BSI, CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
A vulnerability was found in GnuTLS, where a cockpit (which uses gnuTLS) rejects a certificate chain with distributed trust. This issue occurs when validating a certificate chain with cockpit-certificate-ensure.
Update Gnutls to version 3.8.3, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 to version 0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support to version 0:3.7.6-21.el9_2.2.
- Affected
- Gnutls
lt 3.8.0..3.8.3 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
lt *..0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support
lt *..0:3.7.6-21.el9_2.2 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
lt *..v4.15.0-37 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
lt *..v4.15.0-68 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
lt *..v4.15.0-158 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
lt *..v4.15.0-39 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
lt *..v4.15.0-58 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
lt *..v4.15.0-13 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
lt *..v4.15.0-81 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
lt *..v4.15.0-79 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
lt *..v4.15.0-22 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
lt *..v4.15.0-57 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
lt *..v4.15.0-6 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
lt *..v4.15.0-15 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
lt *..v4.15.0-54 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
lt *..v4.15.0-10 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
lt *..v4.15.0-26 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
lt *..v4.15.0-19 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
lt *..v4.15.0-21 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
lt *..v4.15.0-103 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
lt *..v5.8.6-22 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
lt *..v5.8.6-11 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
lt *..v6.8.1-407 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
lt *..v5.8.6-19 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
lt *..v1.0.0-479 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
lt *..v5.8.6-7 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
lt *..v0.4.0-247 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
lt *..v5.8.6-5 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
lt *..v1.1.0-227 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
lt *..v5.8.1-470 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
lt *..v2.9.6-14 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
lt *..v5.8.6-2 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
lt *..v5.8.6-24 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
lt *..v5.8.6-10 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
lt *..v0.1.0-525 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
lt *..v0.1.0-224 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
lt *..v0.28.1-56
- Gnutls
- Fixed in
- Gnutls
3.8.3 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
0:3.7.6-23.el9_3.3 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support
0:3.7.6-21.el9_2.2 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
v4.15.0-37 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
v4.15.0-68 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
v4.15.0-158 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
v4.15.0-39 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
v4.15.0-58 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
v4.15.0-13 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
v4.15.0-81 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
v4.15.0-79 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
v4.15.0-22 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
v4.15.0-57 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
v4.15.0-6 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
v4.15.0-15 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
v4.15.0-54 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
v4.15.0-10 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
v4.15.0-26 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
v4.15.0-19 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
v4.15.0-21 - Red Hat RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9
v4.15.0-103 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
v5.8.6-22 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
v5.8.6-11 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
v6.8.1-407 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
v5.8.6-19 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
v1.0.0-479 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
v5.8.6-7 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
v0.4.0-247 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
v5.8.6-5 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
v1.1.0-227 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
v5.8.1-470 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
v2.9.6-14 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
v5.8.6-2 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
v5.8.6-24 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
v5.8.6-10 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
v0.1.0-525 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
v0.1.0-224 - Red Hat RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9
v0.28.1-56
- Gnutls
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
7.5
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: Siemens ProductCERT, Red Hat, BSI, CVE.org
1.4 %
EPSS score
Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 72.3
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 83.53 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 1.4 %
- Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 72.3
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: proof of concept · automatable · Technical impact: partial
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 8 May 2025
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-347
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
A vulnerability was found in GnuTLS, where a cockpit (which uses gnuTLS) rejects a certificate chain with distributed trust. This issue occurs when validating a certificate chain with cockpit-certificate-ensure. This flaw allows an unauthenticated, remote client or attacker to initiate a denial of service attack.
Source: siemens_advisory, redhat_csaf, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| — | gnutls |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 |
|
|
| Red Hat | RHODF-4.15-RHEL-9 |
|
|
| Red Hat | RHOL-5.8-RHEL-9 |
|
|
| gnu | gnutls |
|
|
| netapp | active_iq_unified_manager |
|
|
Vendors and products
- Debian Debian Linux
- Fedora Project Infrastructure Fedora
- GNU GnuTLS
- NetApp Active IQ Unified Manager
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support
- Red Hat Red Hat Openshift Container Platform 3.11
- Red Hat Rhodf-4.15-rhel-9
- Red Hat Rhol-5.8-rhel-9
Affected operating systems
| Linux | debian | debian_linux | 11.0 |
| Other | fedoraproject | fedora | 38 |
| Other | fedoraproject | fedora | 39 |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-347Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Base
The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data.
Entry at MITRE CWE-347
References & sources
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2024:0533Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2024:1082Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2024:1383Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2024:2094Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comsecurity/cve/CVE-2024-0567Vulnerability database, x_refsource_REDHAT
- bugzilla.redhat.comRHBZ#2258544Issue tracking, x_refsource_REDHAT
- gitlab.comgnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1521
- lists.gnupg.orgpipermail/gnutls-help/2024-January/004841.html
- openwall.comlists/oss-security/2024/01/19/3x_transferred
- lists.fedoraproject.orgarchives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/…x_transferred
- lists.fedoraproject.orgarchives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/…x_transferred
- security.netapp.comadvisory/ntap-20240202-0011x_transferred
- Siemens ProductCERTproductcert/html/ssa-794697.html
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedSiemens ADP
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) added —New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2024/0xxx/CVE-2024-0567.json">CVE-2024-0567</a>Reference added —https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794697.htmlSource identifier: 0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e
Record modifiedRed Hat
Show 22 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0533Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1082Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1383Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:2094Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-0567Reference added —https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258544Reference added —https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1521Reference added —https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-help/2024-January/004841.htmlReference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0533—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1082—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1383—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:2094—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-0567—Reference removed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258544—Reference removed https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1521—Reference removed https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-help/2024-January/004841.html—Reference type removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0533 Types: Third Party Advisory—Reference type removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1082 Types: Third Party Advisory—Reference type removed https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-0567 Types: Third Party Advisory—Reference type removed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258544 Types: Exploit, Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory—Reference type removed https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1521 Types: Exploit, Issue Tracking, Patch, Vendor Advisory—Reference type removed https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-help/2024-January/004841.html Types: Mailing List—Source identifier: secalert@redhat.com
Record modifiedCVE Program
Show 30 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference added —http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/01/19/3Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0533Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1082Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1383Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:2094Reference added —https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-0567Reference added —https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258544Reference added —https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1521Reference added —https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7ZEIOLORQ7N6WRPFXZSYDL2MC4LP7VFV/Reference added —https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GNXKVR5YNUEBNHAHM5GSYKBZX4W2HMN2/Reference added —https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-help/2024-January/004841.htmlReference added —https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240202-0011/Reference removed http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/01/19/3—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0533—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1082—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1383—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:2094—Reference removed https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-0567—Reference removed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258544—Reference removed https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1521—Reference removed https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7ZEIOLORQ7N6WRPFXZSYDL2MC4LP7VFV/—Reference removed https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GNXKVR5YNUEBNHAHM5GSYKBZX4W2HMN2/—Reference removed https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-help/2024-January/004841.html—Reference removed https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240202-0011/—Reference type removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0533 Types: Third Party Advisory—Reference type removed https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1082 Types: Third Party Advisory—Reference type removed https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-0567 Types: Third Party Advisory—Reference type removed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258544 Types: Exploit, Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory—Reference type removed https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/-/issues/1521 Types: Exploit, Issue Tracking, Patch, Vendor Advisory—Reference type removed https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-help/2024-January/004841.html Types: Mailing List—Source identifier: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2024-0567"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2024-0567.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2024-0567 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>