CriticalCVE-2022-20701

    Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Vulnerabilities (CVE-2022-20701)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org

    Share

    What is affected, what to do

    A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, and RV345 Series Routers allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code, escalate privileges, bypass authentication and authorization protections, execute unsigned software, and cause a denial of service. The vulnerability is actively exploited, including in ransomware campaigns since 2022. Affected products include firmware versions 1.0.03.24. Immediate patching to the latest firmware version is critical to mitigate this risk.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • Cisco Rv340 Firmware lte *..1.0.03.24
    • Cisco Rv340w Firmware lte *..1.0.03.24
    • Cisco Rv345 Firmware lte *..1.0.03.24
    • Cisco Rv345p Firmware lte *..1.0.03.24

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    10.0

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3

    10.0

    CVSS v3

    Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: CVE.org

    9.8 %

    EPSS score

    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 95.6

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    223.43 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploited
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    10.0 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    10.0
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    9.8 %
    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    95.6
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 29 October 2024
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-121

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    On its own, this flaw requires local access with a low-privileged account, but it then grants complete control over the device's confidentiality, integrity and availability. Its real-world danger comes from chaining with sibling flaws in the same advisory, notably authentication bypass and remote code execution, which have been publicly documented. Exploitation likelihood is well above the norm across all CVEs. CISA does not flag ransomware use, but compromised SOHO and branch routers are routinely abused as footholds, proxies or botnet nodes. Organisations running RV34x units at branch sites or with internet-exposed management should treat patching as high urgency, within 24–72 h. Devices managed only internally with no third-party accounts can reasonably wait for the next regular maintenance window.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Inventory: Locate every Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, RV340W, RV345 and RV345P via CMDB, network scans and DHCP/ARP tables. Record the firmware version; RV34x devices on 1.0.03.24 are confirmed affected.
      • Upgrade firmware: A patch is available from Cisco. Look up the fixed version in the Cisco security advisory covering the RV Series vulnerabilities (February 2022). Only use signed images from Cisco's software download portal and verify the hash before flashing.
      • Disable remote management: Until patched, turn off WAN-side remote administration of the web UI over HTTPS under "Firewall → Basic Settings → Remote Web Management". Restrict management to a dedicated admin VLAN.
      • Rotate credentials: Exploitation requires a low-privileged account. Audit all local users on each device, delete unused accounts, and reset every password. This includes VPN users and RADIUS shared secrets.
      • Compromise check: For devices that were internet-reachable before patching, export the running config and diff it against a known-good baseline. Look for unknown accounts, changed DNS/NTP servers, new port forwards and new VPN profiles. If anything looks off, factory-reset the device, reflash the firmware and rebuild the config by hand.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Network segmentation: Restrict ACL access to router management services (HTTPS/443 and any alternate admin port) to a jump-host subnet. Block user and guest VLANs from reaching router management.
      • Break the exploit chain: The advisory bundles several flaws, including authentication bypass, command injection and loading unsigned software, which chain into full takeover. Disable Plug and Play (PnP), unused SSL VPN services and Umbrella/cloud features unless they are operationally required.
      • IAM/least privilege: Eliminate shared accounts and keep user roles to the minimum needed. Centralise authentication via RADIUS with logging where possible, and remove guest accounts on the router itself.
      • Egress filtering: At the upstream perimeter, limit router-originated traffic to essentials (NTP, DNS, Cisco update endpoints). This hampers payload retrieval and C2 after privilege escalation.
      • Lifecycle: Flag small-business routers at KRITIS/NIS2-relevant sites as a risk in the asset register. Plan their replacement with centrally managed, regularly patched edge devices.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Router syslog: Forward syslog to the SIEM and alert on low-privileged logins followed shortly by config changes or admin actions. Example SPL: index=network host=rv* ("login" OR "config") | transaction user maxspan=10m | where eventcount>3.
      • Zeek/Suricata: Flag HTTPS sessions to router management IPs from unauthorised networks. Example Zeek filter: conn.log id.resp_h in <router_mgmt_ips> and id.resp_p==443 and not id.orig_h in <admin_net>.
      • NetFlow/firewall: Watch for new outbound flows sourced from the router management IP, such as TFTP/69, HTTP downloads, odd high ports or connections to foreign ASNs. These are strong indicators of staged binaries or reverse shells.
      • Integrity drift: Diff exported configs against the baseline on a schedule and raise a ticket on any change. Also alert on unexpected reboots or firmware version changes outside maintenance windows.
      • Sigma shape: logsource: product=cisco_rv; detection: selection: msg|contains: ['user added','privilege','firmware upgrade']; condition: selection and not filter_change_window.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, and RV345 Series Routers could allow an attacker to do any of the following: Execute arbitrary code Elevate privileges Execute arbitrary commands Bypass authentication and authorization protections Fetch and run unsigned software Cause denial of service (DoS) For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.

    Source: NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)

    Vendors and products

    Affected operating systems

    Affected operating systems
    Otherciscorv340_firmware—
    Otherciscorv340w_firmware—
    Otherciscorv345_firmware—
    Otherciscorv345p_firmware—

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-121Stack-based Buffer Overflow

      Variant

      A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).

      Entry at MITRE CWE-121

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited

    References & sources

    • tools.cisco.com20220203 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers VulnerabilitiesVendor advisory, x_refsource_CISCO, Vendor advisory
    • zerodayinitiative.comadvisories/ZDI-22-412x_refsource_MISC, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2022-20701government-resource, US government resource
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2022-20701
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2022-20701"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2022-20701.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2022-20701 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>