CriticalCVE-2022-0028

    PAN-OS: Reflected Amplification Denial-of-Service (DoS) Vulnerability in URL Filtering (CVE-2022-0028)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org

    What is affected, what to do

    A PAN-OS URL filtering policy misconfiguration could allow a network-based attacker to conduct reflected and amplified TCP denial-of-service (RDoS) attacks. The DoS attack would appear to originate from a Palo Alto Networks PA-Series (hardware), VM-Series (virtual) and CN-Series (container) firewall against an attacker-specified target.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS to version 8.1.23-h1, Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS to version 9.0.16-h3, Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS to version 9.1.14-h4. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS lt 8.1..8.1.23-h1
    • Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS lt 9.0..9.0.16-h3
    • Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS lt 9.1..9.1.14-h4
    • Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS lt 10.0..10.0.11-h1
    • Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS lt 10.1..10.1.6-h6
    • Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS lt 10.2..10.2.2-h2
    Fixed in
    • Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS 8.1.23-h1
    • Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS 9.0.16-h3
    • Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS 9.1.14-h4
    • Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS 10.0.11-h1
    • Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS 10.1.6-h6
    • Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS 10.2.2-h2

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    8.6

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    8.6

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: CVE.org

    2.5 %

    EPSS score

    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 84.9

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    201.91 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploited
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    8.6 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    8.6
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    2.5 %
    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    84.9
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-406

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    The flaw is network-reachable without authentication and has a changed scope: the firewall itself is not compromised, but it gets turned into a reflector against third parties. CISA lists it because TCP middlebox amplification has been used in real DDoS campaigns to mask the true origin of the attack. There is no reported ransomware use, and exploitation likelihood is moderate to elevated. Because exploitability depends on an atypical misconfiguration, run the configuration audit within hours. If no matching rule exists, patching in the next regular window is defensible. If one does exist, treat this as high priority, mainly because of liability and reputational exposure toward third parties rather than direct impact on your own environment.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Audit for the vulnerable configuration first: On every PA-Series, VM-Series and CN-Series firewall, find security rules whose source zone contains an internet-facing interface and that carry a URL Filtering profile with one or more blocked categories. Only that combination is exploitable. Use Panorama or the CLI (show running security-policy) and cross-check profile-setting against the source zones.
      • Remove URL Filtering profiles from inbound rules: URL Filtering belongs on outbound (trust → untrust) traffic. On untrust-sourced rules it is almost certainly a mistake. Detach the profile and commit. This removes the attack surface without a maintenance window.
      • Apply the PAN-OS hotfix: Upgrade to 8.1.23-h1, 9.0.16-h3, 9.1.14-h4, 10.0.11-h1, 10.1.6-h6 or 10.2.2-h2 (or later in the same train). Upgrade HA pairs in the usual order: passive first, then fail over.
      • Out of scope, no action needed: Panorama M-Series and Panorama virtual appliances are not affected. Cloud NGFW and Prisma Access were fixed by the vendor.
      • Engage upstream and abuse channels: If your public firewall IPs show up in abuse reports or blocklists, notify your ISP or upstream provider. The attack makes your firewall look like the attacker, which creates reputational exposure and may trigger NIS2 reporting if third parties are harmed.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Configuration / policy design: Bind URL Filtering profiles only to rules with internal source zones. Add a Panorama config-audit check that flags any new rule pairing an untrust source zone with a URL profile, and track it as a configuration-baseline deviation.
      • Zone Protection (vendor workaround where the profile can't be removed): On the external zone, apply a Zone Protection profile with Packet Based Attack Protection → TCP Drop and enable "TCP SYN with Data" and "TCP SYNACK with Data". The amplification relies on SYN packets carrying an HTTP request that triggers a block page before any handshake completes.
      • Network edge filtering: At the upstream router or anti-DDoS service, drop or rate-limit TCP SYNs with payload aimed at your firewall's public addresses. Use DoS Protection profiles to cap response traffic from the firewall to any single destination.
      • Response-page hardening: Where the business allows it, use reset-both or drop instead of the HTML block page for externally triggered blocks. The response page is what provides the amplification.
      • Patch governance: Put the 8.1 and 9.0 trains on the retirement roadmap. Perimeter firewalls are critical assets and should sit inside the tightest patch SLA in your ISMS.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • PAN-OS URL Filtering logs: Look for bursts of action=block-url with from_zone set to the external zone and many varied (likely spoofed) source IPs. SPL: index=pan sourcetype=pan:threat log_subtype=url action=block-url src_zone=untrust | stats count by src_ip, url_category | where count>100
      • Zeek weird.log: Look for spikes of name=="SYN_with_data" targeting your firewall IPs, the hallmark of middlebox amplification. Suricata: a rule matching flags:S; dsize:>0; toward your public firewall prefix.
      • NetFlow/IPFIX at the perimeter: Look for asymmetric flows where small inbound SYNs are followed by much larger outbound traffic from the firewall to a single external host, with no completed handshake.
      • Config monitoring: Alert on Panorama config-log entries or commit audits that attach a url-filtering profile to an untrust-sourced rule. Sigma shape: logsource: paloalto config; selection: cmd=set, path|contains: 'profile-setting', zone: untrust.
      • External signals: Watch for abuse complaints, Shadowserver or national CERT reports, or DDoS complaints that name your firewall IPs as the source.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    A PAN-OS URL filtering policy misconfiguration could allow a network-based attacker to conduct reflected and amplified TCP denial-of-service (RDoS) attacks. The DoS attack would appear to originate from a Palo Alto Networks PA-Series (hardware), VM-Series (virtual) and CN-Series (container) firewall against an attacker-specified target. To be misused by an external attacker, the firewall configuration must have a URL filtering profile with one or more blocked categories assigned to a source zone that has an external facing interface. This configuration is not typical for URL filtering and, if set, is likely unintended by the administrator. If exploited, this issue would not impact the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of our products. However, the resulting denial-of-service (DoS) attack may help obfuscate the identity of the attacker and implicate the firewall as the source of the attack. We have taken prompt action to address this issue in our PAN-OS software. All software updates for this issue are expected to be released no later than the week of August 15, 2022. This issue does not impact Panorama M-Series or Panorama virtual appliances. This issue has been resolved for all Cloud NGFW and Prisma Access customers and no additional action is required from them.

    Source: NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    Palo Alto NetworksPAN-OS
    • 10.1 – < 10.1.6-h6
    • 8.1 – < 8.1.23-h1
    • 10.0 – < 10.0.11-h1
    • 9.1 – < 9.1.14-h4
    • 9.0 – < 9.0.16-h3
    • 10.2 – < 10.2.2-h2
    • 10.1.6-h6
    • 8.1.23-h1
    • 10.0.11-h1
    • 9.1.14-h4
    • 9.0.16-h3
    • 10.2.2-h2

    Vendors and products

    Affected operating systems

    Affected operating systems
    Otherpaloaltonetworkspan-os10.0.11
    Otherpaloaltonetworkspan-os10.1.6
    Otherpaloaltonetworkspan-os10.2.2
    Otherpaloaltonetworkspan-os8.1.23
    Otherpaloaltonetworkspan-os9.0.16
    Otherpaloaltonetworkspan-os9.1.14
    Otherpaloaltonetworkspan-os—

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-406Insufficient Control of Network Message Volume (Network Amplification)

      Class

      The product does not sufficiently monitor or control transmitted network traffic volume, so that an actor can cause the product to transmit more traffic than should be allowed for that actor.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-406

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited

    References & sources

    • security.paloaltonetworks.comCVE-2022-0028x_refsource_MISC, Mitigation, Third-party advisory
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2022-0028government-resource, US government resource
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2022-0028
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2022-0028"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2022-0028.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2022-0028 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>