CriticalCVE-2021-43890

    Windows AppX Installer Spoofing Vulnerability (CVE-2021-43890)

    Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org

    Share

    What is affected, what to do

    We have investigated reports of a spoofing vulnerability in AppX installer that affects Microsoft Windows. Microsoft is aware of attacks that attempt to exploit this vulnerability by using specially crafted packages that include the malware family known as Emotet/Trickbot/Bazaloader.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. Update app_installer to version 1.16. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • Microsoft App Installer gte 1.0.0.0..*

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    7.1

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    7.1

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: CVE.org

    11.3 %

    EPSS score

    Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 96.0

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    234.37 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploited
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    7.1 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    7.1
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    11.3 %
    Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    96.0
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 14 December 2021

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    This CVE is on KEV because it powered high-volume phishing campaigns that used spoofed App Installer packages to deliver Emotet, TrickBot and BazaLoader, which are classic precursors to ransomware deployment. CISA explicitly flags known ransomware use. Exploitation needs user interaction and has higher attack complexity, but it is network-deliverable and yields full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact. Its exploitation likelihood is well above average. Any organisation with Windows endpoints and inbound email should treat it as high priority, especially where users hold local admin rights and no application control is in place. The GPO protocol disable is quick to roll out and should be applied immediately regardless of patch status.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Update Desktop App Installer: Move every client on the App Installer 1.11 and 1.16 branches to the fixed build via Microsoft Store or Intune/Store for Business. A patch is available from the vendor; look up the exact version in the vendor advisory. Inventory the fleet with Get-AppxPackage -AllUsers Microsoft.DesktopAppInstaller | Select Name,Version.
      • Enforce-disable the ms-appinstaller protocol: The December 2023 update turns it off by default. Pin that state with the GPO "Windows Components > Desktop App Installer > Enable App Installer ms-appinstaller protocol" = Disabled (registry: HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\AppInstaller\EnableMSAppInstallerProtocol = 0). This stops stale installs from re-enabling it.
      • Mail gateway: Quarantine attachments and links ending in .appx, .appxbundle, .msix, .msixbundle and .appinstaller. Block ms-appinstaller:?source= URIs at mail and web proxy.
      • Retro-hunt: Search 30 to 90 days back for MSIX/AppX installs from unmanaged sources (see Detection rules). Isolate any hits and investigate for Emotet/TrickBot/BazaLoader follow-on activity.
      • On confirmed compromise: Reset the affected user's credentials and any cached or privileged credentials present on the host. These loaders are initial-access tooling for credential theft and ransomware.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Configuration/GPO: Where there is no business need, disable App Installer entirely ("Enable App Installer" = Disabled). Restrict sideloading by turning off "Allow all trusted apps to install", so only Store or explicitly approved packages can be installed.
      • Application control: Use AppLocker Packaged app Rules or WDAC publisher rules to allow only approved signing certificates. Default-deny all other MSIX/AppX packages.
      • Least privilege: Run users as standard accounts. The advisory notes that non-admin users are less impacted. Use LAPS for local admin accounts.
      • Web proxy/IPS: Block downloads of .appinstaller/.msix files and the content types application/msix, application/appx and application/appinstaller from uncategorised or newly registered domains. Add an IPS pattern for ms-appinstaller: in HTTP responses and redirects.
      • User awareness: Send a targeted phishing notice about fake "Adobe/PDF component" or "browser update" pages that prompt users to install an app. This is the typical lure.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Windows event logs: Forward Microsoft-Windows-AppXDeploymentServer/Operational and Microsoft-Windows-AppxPackagingOM/Operational to the SIEM. Alert on deployment events (e.g. EID 400/404) where the package source is an HTTP(S) URL or a user path (\Downloads\, \INetCache\).
      • EDR process ancestry: browser or mail client → AppInstaller.exe → binary under C:\Program Files\WindowsApps\<unknown publisher>\ → powershell.exe/cmd.exe/rundll32.exe. Sigma shape: ParentImage|contains: '\WindowsApps\' AND Image|endswith: ['\powershell.exe','\cmd.exe','\rundll32.exe'].
      • Defender for Endpoint (KQL): DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName =~ "AppInstaller.exe" or ProcessCommandLine has "ms-appinstaller:"
      • Proxy/Zeek: In http.log/proxy logs, look for URIs ending .appinstaller|.msix|.appx or Location headers containing ms-appinstaller:?source=. SPL: index=proxy (uri="*.msix" OR uri="*.appinstaller" OR uri="*ms-appinstaller*") | stats count by src_ip, dest_host
      • Signer review: Compare newly installed packages that have unknown or recently issued code-signing certificates (Get-AppxPackage | Select Publisher, SignatureKind) against your approved publisher list.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    We have investigated reports of a spoofing vulnerability in AppX installer that affects Microsoft Windows. Microsoft is aware of attacks that attempt to exploit this vulnerability by using specially crafted packages that include the malware family known as Emotet/Trickbot/Bazaloader. An attacker could craft a malicious attachment to be used in phishing campaigns. The attacker would then have to convince the user to open the specially crafted attachment. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights. Please see the Security Updates table for the link to the updated app. Alternatively you can download and install the Installer using the links provided in the FAQ section. Please see the Mitigations and Workaround sections for important information about steps you can take to protect your system from this vulnerability. December 27 2023 Update: In recent months, Microsoft Threat Intelligence has seen an increase in activity from threat actors leveraging social engineering and phishing techniques to target Windows OS users and utilizing the ms-appinstaller URI scheme. To address this increase in activity, we have updated the App Installer to disable the ms-appinstaller protocol by default and recommend other potential mitigations.

    Source: CISA KEV Catalog, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE)

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    MicrosoftApp Installer
    • ≥ 1.0.0.0
    • —
    microsoftapp_installer
    • < 1.16
    • < 1.11
    • 1.16
    • 1.11

    Vendors and products

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited

    References & sources

    Changes to this CVE

    Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).

    1. Record modifiedCISA ADP

      CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: active, automatable: no

      Show the original change
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      SSVC assessmentchanged
      {"id":"CVE-2021-43890","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-05T20:33:55.454012Z"}
      {"id":"CVE-2021-43890","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2021-12-14T00:00:00+00:00"}

      Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    2. Record modifiedCISA ADP

      CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: active, automatable: no

      Show the original change
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      SSVC assessmentchanged
      {"id":"CVE-2021-43890","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"slow"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2021-12-14T00:00:00+00:00"}
      {"id":"CVE-2021-43890","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-05T20:33:55.454012Z"}

      Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2021-43890
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2021-43890"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2021-43890.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2021-43890 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>