Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability (CVE-2021-42287)
Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. Update Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 to version 6.1.7601.25769, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation) to version 6.1.7601.25769, Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 to version 6.0.6003.21282. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1
lt 6.1.7601.0..6.1.7601.25769 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)
lt 6.1.7601.0..6.1.7601.25769 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2
lt 6.0.6003.0..6.0.6003.21282 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)
lt 6.0.6003.0..6.0.6003.21282 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012
lt 6.2.9200.0..6.2.9200.23517 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)
lt 6.2.9200.0..6.2.9200.23517 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2
lt 6.3.9600.0..6.3.9600.20174 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
lt 6.3.9600.0..6.3.9600.20174 - Microsoft Windows Server 2016
lt 10.0.14393.0..10.0.14393.4770 - Microsoft Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)
lt 10.0.14393.0..10.0.14393.4770 - Microsoft Windows Server 2019
lt 10.0.17763.0..10.0.17763.2300 - Microsoft Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)
lt 10.0.17763.0..10.0.17763.2300 - Microsoft Windows Server 2022
lt 10.0.20348.0..10.0.20348.350 - Microsoft Windows Server version 2004
lt 10.0.0..10.0.19041.1348 - Microsoft Windows Server version 20H2
lt 10.0.0..10.0.19041.1348
- Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1
- Fixed in
- Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1
6.1.7601.25769 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)
6.1.7601.25769 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2
6.0.6003.21282 - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)
6.0.6003.21282 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012
6.2.9200.23517 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)
6.2.9200.23517 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2
6.3.9600.20174 - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
6.3.9600.20174 - Microsoft Windows Server 2016
10.0.14393.4770 - Microsoft Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)
10.0.14393.4770 - Microsoft Windows Server 2019
10.0.17763.2300 - Microsoft Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)
10.0.17763.2300 - Microsoft Windows Server 2022
10.0.20348.350 - Microsoft Windows Server version 2004
10.0.19041.1348 - Microsoft Windows Server version 20H2
10.0.19041.1348
- Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
7.5
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org
77.2 %
EPSS score
High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.55
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 241.78 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploited
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 77.2 %
- High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 99.55
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 19 August 2025
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
Chained with CVE-2021-42278, this flaw lets any authenticated domain user with default rights take over the whole domain in minutes. Public tooling automates every step, so the "high complexity" in the vector reflects only the chaining requirement and offers no real protection. CISA flags known ransomware campaign use: operators use it after initial access via phishing or VPN to escalate quickly before deploying encryptors, and exploitation likelihood is very high. Any AD estate with even one unpatched DC, or a MachineAccountQuota still at the default, should treat this as critical with a 24-hour remediation target. For NIS2 entities, a retro-hunt hit is likely a reportable incident.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Patch every domain controller (DC): Microsoft's November 2021 security updates fix CVE-2021-42287 (KDC PAC validation). In practice it is exploited together with CVE-2021-42278 (sAMAccountName spoofing), known as "noPac". Look up the exact KB per server version in the Microsoft advisory. Every DC, RODCs included, must be updated, because one unpatched DC keeps the path open.
- Verify builds against inventory: Reference builds from the advisory data are Server 2016 at 10.0.14393.4770 or later, Server 2019 at 10.0.17763.2300 or later, and Server 2022 at 10.0.20348.350 or later. Sweep with
Get-ADDomainController -Filter * | % { Get-HotFix -ComputerName $_.HostName }. - Set
ms-DS-MachineAccountQuotato 0: This stops standard users from creating computer accounts and breaks the common attack chain immediately:Set-ADDomain -Identity <domain> -Replace @{"ms-DS-MachineAccountQuota"="0"}. - Enforce PAC requestor validation: Set
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Kdc\PacRequestorEnforcementto2, or confirm that later cumulative updates have made enforcement mandatory. Make sure nobody has set it back to0. - Retro-hunt for compromise: Search DC Security logs back to at least November 2021 for the rename patterns below. A hit means you should treat the domain as compromised: reset
krbtgttwice, rotate privileged credentials and invoke the AD incident-response plan.
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- IAM / least privilege: Use GPO to remove "Add workstations to domain" (
SeMachineAccountPrivilege) from Authenticated Users and grant it only to a dedicated domain-join group. Audit write access tosAMAccountName/servicePrincipalNameon computer objects with BloodHound or ADACLScanner. - Network segmentation: Allow Kerberos (88/TCP+UDP), LDAP/LDAPS (389, 636, 3268/3269), SMB (445) and RPC (135 plus the dynamic range) to DCs only from sanctioned client and server subnets. Guest, OT and DMZ segments get no direct DC access.
- Tiering: Enforce Tier 0: administer DCs only from PAWs. Put privileged accounts in Protected Users and flag them "sensitive and cannot be delegated" to blunt S4U2self abuse.
- IPS/NDR: Alert on a Kerberos AS-REQ for a principal without
$that matches a DC name, followed by an S4U2self TGS-REQ (Zeek kerberos.log, Suricata). Microsoft Defender for Identity flags this natively as "Suspected SAM name spoofing". - Configuration hygiene: Find computer objects created by non-admins (populated
mS-DS-CreatorSID) and remove any that are not authorised.
- IAM / least privilege: Use GPO to remove "Add workstations to domain" (
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Event ID 4781 (account name changed): Flag a computer account renamed to a name without a trailing
$, especially one matching a DC hostname. KQL:SecurityEvent | where EventID == 4781 and OldTargetUserName endswith "$" and NewTargetUserName !endswith "$" - Kerberos sequence on DCs: 4741 (computer created by a non-admin), then 4781, then 4768 (TGT for the DC name without
$), then 4781 again (rename back), then 4769 (S4U2self service ticket), all within 10 minutes. Build this as a Sigma correlation rule. - Post-patch KDC events (System log, source
Microsoft-Windows-Kerberos-Key-Distribution-Center): IDs 35, 36, 37 and 38 (PAC missing or requestor mismatch) indicate attempted exploitation or legacy clients. Directory-Services-SAM 16990/16991 show blocked sAMAccountName changes. - EDR / process telemetry: Watch for
noPac.exe,Rubeus.exe s4u /self, Python running Impacket (addcomputer.py,renameMachine.py,getST.py -self -impersonate) and Powermad'sSet-MachineAccountAttribute. Sources are Sysmon EID 1 and PowerShell 4104. - Follow-on activity: DCSync, seen as Event ID 4662 with the replication GUIDs
1131f6aa-…/1131f6ad-…from a non-DC source, shortly after any of the chains above.
- Event ID 4781 (account name changed): Flag a computer account renamed to a name without a trailing
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
Source: cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 R2 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2019 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server 2022 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server version 2004 |
|
|
| Microsoft | Windows Server version 20H2 |
|
|
Vendors and products
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows Server 2004
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows Server 2008
- Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1
- Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (server Core Installation)
- Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2
- Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (server Core Installation)
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows Server 2012
- Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2
- Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 (server Core Installation)
- Microsoft Windows Server 2012 (server Core Installation)
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows Server 2016
- Microsoft Windows Server 2016 (server Core Installation)
Affected operating systems
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2004 | 10.0.19041.1348 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2004 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2008 | r2 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2008 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2008_R2 | 6.1.7601.25769 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2008_sp2 | 6.0.6003.21282 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2012 | 6.2.9200.23517 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2012 | r2 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2012 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2012_R2 | 6.3.9600.20174 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2016 | 10.0.14393.4770 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2016 | 2004 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2016 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2019 | 10.0.17763.2300 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2019 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2022 | 10.0.20348.350 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_2022 | — |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_20H2 | 10.0.19041.1348 |
| Windows | microsoft | windows_server_20h2 | — |
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited |
References & sources
- portal.msrc.microsoft.comen-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-42287x_refsource_MISC, x_transferred
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2021-42287government-resource
- Microsoft Security Update GuideActive Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege VulnerabilityVendor advisory, Patch
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedMicrosoft
Show 4 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference added —https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-42287Reference removed https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-42287—Reference type removed https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-42287 Types: Patch, Vendor Advisory—Affected versions (publisher) changed Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation), Windows Server 2022 (+13)Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1, Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation), Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (+12)Source identifier: secure@microsoft.com
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: active, automatable: no
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After SSVC assessment changed {"id":"CVE-2021-42287","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2025-12-20T04:56:06.847529Z"}{"id":"CVE-2021-42287","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2025-08-19T00:00:00+00:00"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2021-42287"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2021-42287.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2021-42287 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>