Open Management Infrastructure Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability (CVE-2021-38649)
Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org
- Actively exploited
- Source: ANSSI / CERT-FR How we classify
What is affected, what to do
Open Management Infrastructure Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update open_management_infrastructure to version 1.6.8-1. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Microsoft Azure Automation State Configuration, DSC Extension
gte 2.0.0..* - Microsoft Azure Automation Update Management
gte 1.0.0..* - Microsoft Azure Diagnostics (LAD)
gte 3.0.0..* - Microsoft Azure Security Center
gte 1.0.0..* - Microsoft Azure Sentinel
gte 1.0.0..* - Microsoft Azure Stack Hub
gte 1.0.0..* - Microsoft Container Monitoring Solution
gte 1.0.0..* - Microsoft Log Analytics Agent
gte 1.0.0..* - Microsoft Open Management Infrastructure
gte 16.0..* - Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
gte 1.0.0..*
- Microsoft Azure Automation State Configuration, DSC Extension
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.0
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
7.0
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org
2.9 %
EPSS score
Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 86.8
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 195.26 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploitedSource: ANSSI / CERT-FR How we classify
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.0 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.0
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 2.9 %
- Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 86.8
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This is a local, higher-complexity flaw, but successful exploitation yields full root on the host. It landed on KEV through the OMIGOD campaigns, where attackers chained the OMI bugs with remote access to take over Azure Linux VMs for cryptomining and botnets such as Mirai variants. CISA does not flag ransomware use, but exploitation likelihood is elevated relative to most CVEs. Rate it high for any organisation running Linux workloads in Azure or under SCOM management, because OMI is frequently present without anyone knowing. Escalate to critical where OMI ports are reachable externally or where hosts are multi-user.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Inventory every Linux VM running OMI. The affected Azure extensions (Log Analytics Agent, LAD, DSC, Update Management, Container Monitoring, Defender/Security Center, Sentinel) silently install OMI. Check with
dpkg -l omiorrpm -qa omi; affected hosts will have/opt/omi/bin/omiserver. Use Azure Resource Graph or Defender for Cloud to sweep the whole fleet. - Apply the vendor fix for OMI. A patch is available from the vendor; look up the exact version in the Microsoft Security Update Guide entry for CVE-2021-38649 or in the
microsoft/omiGitHub releases. Extensions do not always auto-update, so upgrade the package and extension manually. This includes Azure Stack Hub and on-prem or hybrid hosts. - Remove orphaned OMI installs. If a host has been migrated to Azure Monitor Agent or no longer needs the extension, uninstall it. An unused root daemon is pure attack surface.
- Review local accounts on affected hosts. Exploitation requires a low-privileged local foothold. Hunt for unknown users, rogue
authorized_keysentries, and compromised web-app or container service accounts. - Treat the sibling bugs together. This CVE is part of the "OMIGOD" set alongside CVE-2021-38647, an unauthenticated RCE. Immediately close external access to OMI ports 5985, 5986 and 1270.
- Inventory every Linux VM running OMI. The affected Azure extensions (Log Analytics Agent, LAD, DSC, Update Management, Container Monitoring, Defender/Security Center, Sentinel) silently install OMI. Check with
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network segmentation: Add NSG and firewall rules denying inbound TCP 5985, 5986 and 1270 to Linux VMs. Allow exceptions only for documented management sources such as SCOM servers. This breaks the remote-foothold-to-root chain.
- Host hardening: Verify permissions on
/var/opt/omi/run/omiserver.sockand/var/opt/omi/; non-root users must not have write access. Where feasible, confine socket access to the agent processes with AppArmor or SELinux. - IAM/least privilege: Minimise interactive shell access on workload VMs. Run web and application service accounts with
nologin. Never mount/var/opt/omiinto containers. - Configuration: If remote management is not required, set
httpport/httpsportto0in/etc/opt/omi/conf/omiserver.confand restart the service. - IPS: Enable Suricata/Snort OMIGOD signatures for HTTP POST to
/wsman, especially requests with noAuthorizationheader andExecuteShellCommandin the body. These flag the remote half of an attack chain.
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- EDR process ancestry: Alert when
omiengineoromiagentspawns a shell or interpreter (sh,bash,python,perl,curl,wget) as UID 0 outside known agent behaviour. Sigma shape:ParentImage|endswith: '/omiagent' and Image|endswith: ['/sh','/bash','/python3']. - auditd: Deploy
-w /var/opt/omi/run/omiserver.sock -p rwa -k omi_sockplus-a always,exit -F arch=b64 -S execve -F euid=0 -F auid>=1000 -k priv_esc. Alert on socket access by a non-root auid followed by anexecvewitheuid=0. - Microsoft Sentinel (KQL):
DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName in~ ("omiagent","omiengine") and FileName in~ ("bash","sh","python3","curl","wget"). - Network telemetry (Zeek): Flag connections to 5985, 5986 or 1270 from unapproved sources. Also flag
http.logentries with URI/wsmanand no authentication. - Post-escalation persistence: Watch for new files in
/etc/cron.d/, changes to/root/.ssh/authorized_keys, or new systemd units shortly after OMI socket access. Correlate these on a single timeline.
- EDR process ancestry: Alert when
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Open Management Infrastructure Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
Source: CISA KEV Catalog, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Azure Automation State Configuration, DSC Extension |
|
|
| Microsoft | Azure Automation Update Management |
|
|
| Microsoft | Azure Diagnostics (LAD) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Azure Security Center |
|
|
| Microsoft | Azure Sentinel |
|
|
| Microsoft | Azure Stack Hub |
|
|
| Microsoft | Container Monitoring Solution |
|
|
| Microsoft | Log Analytics Agent |
|
|
| Microsoft | Open Management Infrastructure |
|
|
| Microsoft | System Center Operations Manager (SCOM) |
|
|
| microsoft | azure_automation_state_configuration |
|
|
| microsoft | azure_automation_update_management |
|
|
| microsoft | azure_diagnostics_\(lad\) |
|
|
| microsoft | azure_open_management_infrastructure |
|
|
| microsoft | azure_security_center |
|
|
| microsoft | azure_sentinel |
|
|
| microsoft | azure_stack_hub |
|
|
| microsoft | container_monitoring_solution |
|
|
| microsoft | log_analytics_agent |
|
|
| microsoft | open_management_infrastructure |
|
|
| microsoft | system_center_operations_manager |
|
|
Vendors and products
- Microsoft Azure Automation State Configuration
- Microsoft Azure Automation State Configuration, Dsc Extension
- Microsoft Azure Automation Update Management
- Microsoft Azure Diagnostics (lad)
- Microsoft Azure Security Center
- Microsoft Azure Sentinel
- Microsoft Azure Stack Hub
- Microsoft Container Monitoring Solution
- Microsoft Log Analytics Agent
- Microsoft Open Management Infrastructure
- Microsoft Microsoft System Center 2019 Operations Manager
- Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (scom)
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| ANSSI / CERT-FRLicence Ouverte 2.0, as of | CERTFR-2021-ALE-020 – [Maj] Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Azure Open Management Infrastructure (clôturée 2022-01-05) (opens in a new tab)cert.cyber.gouv.fr | actively exploited |
References & sources
- portal.msrc.microsoft.comen-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-38649x_refsource_MISC, x_transferred
- Microsoft Security Update GuideOpen Management Infrastructure Elevation of Privilege VulnerabilityVendor advisory, Patch
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2021-38649government-resource
- cert.cyber.gouv.frANSSI / CERT-FR: CERTFR-2021-ALE-020 – [Maj] Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Azure Open Management Infrastructure (clôturée 2022-01-05)cert-fr
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
NVD analysis modifiedNVD
Product mapping changed:- Microsoft System Center 2019 Operations Manager
- Microsoft Azure Automation State Configuration
- Microsoft Azure Automation Update Management
- Microsoft azure diagnostics (lad)
- Microsoft Azure Open Management Infrastructure
- Microsoft Azure Security Center
- Microsoft Azure Sentinel
- Microsoft Azure Stack Hub
- Microsoft Container Monitoring Solution
- Microsoft Log Analytics Agent
- Microsoft Open Management Infrastructure (before 1.6.8-1)
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Product configuration changed OR *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:system_center_operations_manager:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_automation_state_configuration:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_automation_update_management:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_diagnostics_(lad):-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_open_management_infrastructure:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_security_center:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_sentinel:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_stack_hub:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:container_monitoring_solution:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:log_analytics_agent:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*OR *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:system_center_operations_manager:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_automation_state_configuration:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_automation_update_management:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_diagnostics_(lad):-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_open_management_infrastructure:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_security_center:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_sentinel:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_stack_hub:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:container_monitoring_solution:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:log_analytics_agent:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:open_management_infrastructure:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions up to (excluding) 1.6.8-1Reference type added —Microsoft Corporation: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-38649 Types: Patch, Vendor AdvisorySource identifier: nvd@nist.gov
Record modifiedMicrosoft
Show 4 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference added —https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-38649Reference removed https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-38649—Reference type removed https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-38649 Types: Patch, Vendor Advisory—Affected versions (publisher) changed Open Management Infrastructure, System Center Operations Manager (SCOM), Azure Automation State Configuration, DSC Extension (+7)Azure Automation State Configuration, DSC Extension, Azure Automation Update Management, Azure Diagnostics (LAD) (+7)Source identifier: secure@microsoft.com
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2021-38649"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2021-38649.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2021-38649 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>