CriticalCVE-2021-20023

    SonicWall Email Security Path Traversal Vulnerability (CVE-2021-20023)

    Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: SingCERT, CVE.org

    What is affected, what to do

    SonicWall Email Security version 10.0.9.x contains a vulnerability that allows a post-authenticated attacker to read an arbitrary file on the remote host.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. Update email_security to version 10.0.9.6173, email_security_virtual_appliance to version 10.0.9.6177, hosted_email_security to version 10.0.9.6173. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • SonicWall Email Security eq 10.0.9 and earlier..10.0.9 and earlier

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    4.9

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    4.9

    CVSS v3

    Severity Medium on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: SingCERT, CVE.org

    51.7 %

    EPSS score

    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.0

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    227.83 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploitedSource: CSA/SingCERT How we classify
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    4.9 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    4.9
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    51.7 %
    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    99.0
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 12 August 2026
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-22

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    On its own this looks like a moderate bug because it requires high-privilege authentication. In practice, CVE-2021-20021 removes that barrier entirely, and the full chain of account creation, file read and file upload delivers complete system takeover. CISA explicitly flags its use in ransomware campaigns, and exploitation likelihood is very high. Typical targets are organisations exposing the Email Security admin UI to the internet, with the appliance then used as a foothold into Active Directory via stored LDAP credentials. If your admin UI is internet-facing, treat this as top priority and include a compromise assessment. If it is reachable only internally, patch promptly in the next emergency change window.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Scope exposure: Inventory every SonicWall Email Security instance (hardware appliances 3300/4300/5000/5050/7000/7050/8300, virtual appliances and Windows software installs) and confirm the version. The affected branch is 10.0.9.x (including 10.0.9.6173 and firmware 10.0.9.6177).
      • Patch: A patch is available from the vendor — look up the fixed version in the SonicWall PSIRT advisory, which covers CVE-2021-20021/-20022/-20023 together. Because the three bugs are chained, fix all three in the same window. Patching only this CVE leaves the chain usable.
      • Pull the admin UI off the internet: Restrict the web management interface (HTTP/HTTPS admin UI) to a dedicated management network or VPN immediately. Mail flow over SMTP is unaffected.
      • Rule out compromise: Review the administrator account list in the Email Security console for unknown or recently created accounts. CVE-2021-20021 allows unauthenticated admin creation, which supplies the "authentication" this CVE requires. Disable suspicious accounts and preserve evidence before deleting them.
      • Rotate secrets: Arbitrary file read exposes configuration and credential files. Rotate admin passwords, LDAP/AD bind accounts, SMTP relay credentials and any API keys stored on the appliance.
      • Preserve evidence: If compromise is suspected, snapshot or image the appliance or Windows host before patching. Collect Tomcat logs, audit logs and the webapps directory.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Network segmentation: Allow admin UI access only from a management VLAN (ACL: source = admin jump hosts, destination = appliance management port). Restrict appliance egress to SMTP, update servers and other defined destinations to block reverse shells and exfiltration.
      • WAF/IPS: Place a reverse proxy or WAF in front of the management UI that blocks traversal patterns (../, ..%2f, %2e%2e%2f, ..\, %5c). Enable SonicWall Email Security / CVE-2021-20023 signatures in Suricata/Snort or the NGFW in blocking mode.
      • IAM/least privilege: Minimise the number of admin accounts and enforce MFA on console access where supported. Give LDAP bind accounts read-only rights.
      • Endpoint hardening (Windows installs): Run EDR on the host. Use ASR or AppLocker rules to block, or at least alert on, the Tomcat/Java process spawning cmd.exe, powershell.exe or whoami.exe. Put the webapps directory under file integrity monitoring.
      • Configuration: Disable admin UI features you don't use operationally, such as branding/upload functions. Review lifecycle plans for end-of-life hardware.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Web/Tomcat access logs: Look for traversal sequences in requests to the admin UI. Example SPL: index=proxy dest=<ES-appliance> (uri="*../*" OR uri="*%2e%2e*" OR uri="*..%2f*" OR uri="*..%5c*"). Prioritise HTTP 200 responses with unusually large response sizes.
      • Process ancestry (Sysmon EID 1 / EDR): Java/Tomcat spawning shells. Sigma shape: ParentImage|endswith: '\java.exe' AND Image|endswith: ['\cmd.exe','\powershell.exe','\whoami.exe','\net.exe'].
      • Webshell drop (Sysmon EID 11): New .jsp, .jspx or .war files under the Email Security Tomcat webapps directory that don't originate from a vendor update.
      • Application audit log: New admin accounts, role changes, or logins from unfamiliar source IPs. A login shortly after an account is created is a strong signal of the 20021→20023→20022 chain.
      • Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): New outbound non-SMTP connections or unusually high outbound volume from the appliance. Also watch for LDAP bind account logons from hosts other than the appliance (Windows Event ID 4624/4625 on DCs).

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    SonicWall Email Security version 10.0.9.x contains a vulnerability that allows a post-authenticated attacker to read an arbitrary file on the remote host.

    Source: CSA/SingCERT, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), CISA KEV Catalog

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    SonicWallEmail Security
    • 10.0.9 and earlier
    • —
    sonicwallemail_security
    • < 10.0.9.6173
    • 10.0.9.6173
    sonicwallemail_security_virtual_appliance
    • < 10.0.9.6177
    • 10.0.9.6177
    sonicwallhosted_email_security
    • < 10.0.9.6173
    • 10.0.9.6173

    Vendors and products

    Affected operating systems

    Affected operating systems
    Othersonicwallemail_security_appliance_3300_firmware—
    Othersonicwallemail_security_appliance_4300_firmware—
    Othersonicwallemail_security_appliance_5000_firmware—
    Othersonicwallemail_security_appliance_5050_firmware—
    Othersonicwallemail_security_appliance_7000_firmware—
    Othersonicwallemail_security_appliance_7050_firmware—
    Othersonicwallemail_security_appliance_8300_firmware—
    Othersonicwallemail_security_appliance_9000_firmware—

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-22Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

      Base

      The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-22

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited
    CSA/SingCERTZero-Day Vulnerabilities in SonicWall Email Security (opens in a new tab)CSA/SingCERTactively exploited

    References & sources

    Changes to this CVE

    Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).

    1. Record modifiedCVE Program

      Show 3 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0010
      Referenceremoved
      https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0010
      —
      Reference typeremoved
      https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0010 Types: Vendor Advisory
      —

      Source identifier: af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108

    2. Record modifiedsonicwall.com

      Show 3 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0010
      Referenceremoved
      https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0010
      —
      Reference typeremoved
      https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0010 Types: Vendor Advisory
      —

      Source identifier: PSIRT@sonicwall.com

    3. Record modifiedCISA ADP

      CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: active, automatable: yes

      Show 5 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2021-20023
      Referenceremoved
      https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2021-20023
      —
      Reference typeremoved
      https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2021-20023 Types: US Government Resource
      —
      SSVC assessmentremoved
      {"id":"CVE-2021-20023","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2021-04-20T00:00:00+00:00"}
      —
      SSVC assessmentadded
      —
      {"id":"CVE-2021-20023","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-12T03:55:24.717669Z"}

      Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2021-20023
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2021-20023"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2021-20023.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2021-20023 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>