Windows Spoofing Vulnerability (CVE-2020-1464)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
A spoofing vulnerability exists when Windows incorrectly validates file signatures. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could bypass security features and load improperly signed files.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1803
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1809
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server 2019
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1909
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server, version 1909 (Server Core installation)
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1709 for 32-bit Systems
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1709
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit Systems
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1903 for x64-based Systems
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1903 for ARM64-based Systems
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server, version 1903 (Server Core installation)
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 2004
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server version 2004
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server 2016
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)
gte 10.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows 7
gte 6.1.0..* - Microsoft Windows 7 Service Pack 1
gte 6.1.0..* - Microsoft Windows 8.1
gte 6.3.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2
gte 6.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)
gte 6.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1
gte 6.1.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)
gte 6.0.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server 2012
gte 6.2.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)
gte 6.2.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2
gte 6.3.0..* - Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)
gte 6.3.0..*
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1803
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
7.8
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org
39.0 %
EPSS score
Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 98.6
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 216.76 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploited
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 39.0 %
- Elevated — model estimates 10-50% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 98.6
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 4 February 2025
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-347
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This flaw breaks trust in Authenticode signatures. An attacker can append malicious code to a legitimately signed MSI, and Windows still reports the file as validly signed. That lets the payload slip past signature-based allowlists, reputation checks and analyst triage, which makes it attractive in phishing and initial-access campaigns against office workstations. The attack vector is local and requires the user to run a delivered file. Even so, exploitation likelihood is very high, and CISA has not confirmed ransomware use. For organisations with current patch levels the residual priority is low. Any Windows 10 build that is still affected should be treated as high risk and migrated immediately, since several of these builds no longer receive vendor support.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Verify and deploy the security update: Microsoft fixed the signature validation for CVE-2020-1464 in its August 2020 update cycle. The patch is available from the vendor; look up the KB number for each Windows build in the Microsoft Security Update Guide. Use WSUS/Intune/SCCM compliance reports to find every client whose cumulative update predates August 2020.
- Isolate unsupported Windows 10 builds: Affected versions 1507, 1709, 1803 and 1809 are partly out of support. Move these hosts to a quarantine VLAN and prioritise migrating them to a supported build with a current cumulative update. Any unpatched host points to a wider patch-management gap.
- Review signature-based trust: On unpatched hosts, treat as untrusted any AppLocker, WDAC, EDR exclusion or proxy rule that trusts a file solely because it has a valid Authenticode signature. This applies especially to signed
.msifiles. - Hunt for tampered files: Sweep download, temp and mail-attachment directories for files that carry an MSI/CFB header (
D0 CF 11 E0) but use a.jar,.htaor.jsextension, or that contain appended ZIP data (PK\x03\x04). This matches the known "GlueBall" technique. - Stop
.jardouble-click execution: Where the Java runtime has no business use, remove the.jar→javaw.exefile association.
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Application control (WDAC/AppLocker): Allow
javaw.exeandjava.exeonly for defined line-of-business apps. Blockmshta.exe,wscript.exeandcscript.exefor standard users. While hosts remain unpatched, base rules on file hashes rather than publisher alone. - Mail and web gateway: Block or quarantine
.jar,.htaand.msifiles, both as direct attachments and inside archives. Add a content-inspection rule that flags files with a CFB magic number and an embedded ZIP local-file header, regardless of extension. This catches polyglot files. - Endpoint hardening: Enable the Microsoft Defender ASR rule "Block executable files from running unless they meet a prevalence, age, or trusted list criterion". Also enable "Block JavaScript or VBScript from launching downloaded executable content".
- Complementary configuration: Set the
EnableCertPaddingCheckregistry value according to Microsoft's CVE-2013-3900 guidance, which tightens checks on data appended to signed PE files. This adds defence in depth but does not replace the patch. - Least privilege: Remove local admin rights and restrict MSI installation to software-distribution accounts. Make sure the
AlwaysInstallElevatedpolicy is disabled.
- Application control (WDAC/AppLocker): Allow
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Sysmon EID 1 / Security 4688 – Java launching a non-JAR container: Look for
javaw.exeorjava.exerunning-jaragainst a path in\Downloads\,\AppData\Local\Temp\or\Content.Outlook\. As a KQL query:DeviceProcessEvents | where FileName in~ ("javaw.exe","java.exe") and ProcessCommandLine has_any ("\\Downloads\\","\\Temp\\","Content.Outlook"). - Sysmon EID 11 / EDR file events – polyglot file: Run a YARA rule against newly written files:
uint32(0) == 0xE011CFD0 and $pk at > 512, with$pk = { 50 4B 03 04 }. Treat any hit whose extension is not.msias high-confidence. - Process ancestry: A chain of
explorer.exe→javaw.exe→cmd.exe/powershell.exesuggests an executed payload. So doesmshta.exetaking an.msifile as an argument. A Sigma rule can express this asParentImage|endswith: '\javaw.exe'ANDImage|endswith: ['\cmd.exe','\powershell.exe']. - AppLocker/WDAC logs: Review AppLocker EID 8003/8004 and CodeIntegrity EID 3033/3077 for blocked execution attempts from user-writable paths.
- Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): Watch for HTTP downloads of Java archives or MSI files where the extension does not match the magic bytes. A Zeek
files.logentry withmime_type=application/x-ole-storageand a filename ending in.jaris a strong indicator.
- Sysmon EID 1 / Security 4688 – Java launching a non-JAR container: Look for
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
A spoofing vulnerability exists when Windows incorrectly validates file signatures. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could bypass security features and load improperly signed files. In an attack scenario, an attacker could bypass security features intended to prevent improperly signed files from being loaded. The update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Windows validates file signatures.
Source: NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)
Vendors and products
- Microsoft Windows 10 1507
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 1607
- Microsoft Windows 10 1709
- Microsoft Windows 10 1803
- Microsoft Microsoft Windows 10 1809
- Microsoft Windows 10 1903
- Microsoft Windows 10 1909
- Microsoft Windows 10 2004
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1507
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1607
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1709
- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1709 For 32-bit Systems
Affected operating systems
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1507 | — |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1607 | — |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1709 | 1709 |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1709 for 32-bit Systems | 1709 |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1803 | — |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1809 | — |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit Systems | 1903 |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1903 for ARM64-based Systems | 1903 |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1903 for x64-based Systems | 1903 |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 1909 | — |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows 10 Version 2004 | — |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows 7 | — |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows 7 Service Pack 1 | — |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows 8.1 | — |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 | — |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation) | — |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 | — |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation) | — |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 | — |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) | — |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 R2 | — |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) | — |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 | — |
| Windows | Microsoft | Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) | — |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-347Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Base
The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data.
Entry at MITRE CWE-347
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited |
References & sources
- medium.com@TalBeerySec/glueball-the-story-of-cve-2020-1464-50091a1f98bdx_refsource_MISC, Exploit, Third-party advisory
- krebsonsecurity.com2020/08/microsoft-put-off-fixing-zero-day-for-2-yearsx_refsource_MISC, Issue tracking, Third-party advisory
- portal.msrc.microsoft.comen-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1464x_refsource_MISC, Patch, Vendor advisory
- blog.virustotal.com2019/01/distribution-of-malicious-jar-appended.htmlx_refsource_MISC, Third-party advisory
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2020-1464government-resource, US government resource
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2020-1464"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2020-1464.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2020-1464 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>