CriticalCVE-2019-18988

    TeamViewer Desktop Bypass Remote Login Vulnerability (CVE-2019-18988)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org

    What is affected, what to do

    TeamViewer Desktop through 14.7.1965 allows a bypass of remote-login access control because the same key is used for different customers' installations. It used a shared AES key for all installations since at least as far back as v7.0.43148, and used it for at least OptionsPasswordAES in the current version of the product.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • TeamViewer lte *..14.7.1965

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    7.0

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    7.0

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: CVE.org

    4.7 %

    EPSS score

    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 91.8

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    202.37 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploited
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    7.0 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    7.0
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    4.7 %
    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    91.8
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    This CVE is on KEV because the hardcoded AES key is public and decryption tooling is freely available. Attackers use it after initial access to harvest credentials and move laterally through TeamViewer remote sessions, especially where one unattended-access password is reused across many machines. The vector is local, with high complexity and low privileges required. CISA reports no known ransomware use, but the likelihood of exploitation is still elevated. Rate it high if you push TeamViewer passwords via GPO, still run legacy versions, or use TeamViewer for OT and vendor remote maintenance, because leaked config files there allow compromise without any foothold. Rate it medium for current, account-bound, 2FA-protected deployments.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Inventory: Identify every host running TeamViewer Desktop using your software inventory, EDR, or the registry paths HKLM\SOFTWARE\TeamViewer and HKLM\SOFTWARE\WOW6432Node\TeamViewer. All versions up to and including 14.7.1965 are affected. Legacy installs older than v9.x are the most critical.
      • Upgrade: Move to a release later than 14.7.1965. A patch is available from the vendor; look up the exact fixed version in the TeamViewer security bulletin. Uninstall unused or legacy (v7/v8) installations outright rather than upgrading them.
      • Rotate secrets: Change every unattended-access password, options password (OptionsPasswordAES), and stored proxy or licence credential on affected hosts. The AES key is public, so treat every previously stored value as disclosed.
      • Hunt off-host configs: Search file shares, GPO/SCCM/Intune packages, deployment repos, ticket attachments, and backups for exported .reg or .tvopt files containing TeamViewer settings. Any such file lets an attacker decrypt the stored password without touching the endpoint. Remove these files and rotate the affected passwords immediately.
      • Block shadow installs: Use application control (AppLocker/WDAC) to block unsanctioned TeamViewer binaries until the estate is cleaned up.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Access configuration: Disable the static "personal password". Switch to Easy Access bound to TeamViewer accounts with enforced 2FA. Restrict the block-and-allow list to your company profile, and lock these settings with a TeamViewer Management Console policy.
      • Network segmentation: Allow outbound TeamViewer traffic (TCP 5938, with fallback over 443/80 to TeamViewer infrastructure) only from approved support systems or zones. In OT/KRITIS segments, replace TeamViewer with a controlled remote-maintenance path such as a jump host with session recording.
      • Endpoint hardening: Audit read access to the TeamViewer registry keys with a SACL. Review filesystem ACLs on %ProgramFiles%\TeamViewer. Minimise local admin rights, since anyone with a local session can read and decrypt the stored values.
      • IAM/least privilege: Do not share one unattended-access password across hosts. Use a unique password per host and keep it in a PAM solution or password vault.
      • Deployment hygiene: Stop distributing TeamViewer through .reg exports that carry embedded password blobs. Use the official MSI rollout with account assignment through the Management Console instead.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Sysmon EID 1 / Security 4688: Look for reg query or reg export command lines containing TeamViewer, or PowerShell Get-ItemProperty calls on *AES values. KQL: DeviceProcessEvents | where ProcessCommandLine has "TeamViewer" and ProcessCommandLine has_any ("reg query","reg export","PasswordAES").
      • Security 4663 (requires SACL): Alert on reads of \REGISTRY\MACHINE\SOFTWARE\WOW6432Node\TeamViewer by any process other than TeamViewer_Service.exe or TeamViewer.exe. Sigma shape: ObjectName|contains: 'TeamViewer' with a ProcessName|endswith exclusion list.
      • Post-exploitation tooling: Use EDR signatures or memory artefacts to catch known credential harvesters, such as the Metasploit module post/windows/gather/credentials/teamviewer_passwords or PowerShell scripts that embed the public AES key or IV as string literals.
      • TeamViewer logs: Forward Connections_incoming.txt and TeamViewer*_Logfile.log from %ProgramFiles%\TeamViewer to the SIEM. Alert on inbound sessions outside maintenance windows, sessions from unknown TeamViewer IDs, or file transfers without a matching change ticket.
      • Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): Flag TCP 5938 connections or connections to TeamViewer master servers from hosts outside the approved inventory. These indicate a freshly dropped or hidden TeamViewer instance used for persistence.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    TeamViewer Desktop through 14.7.1965 allows a bypass of remote-login access control because the same key is used for different customers' installations. It used a shared AES key for all installations since at least as far back as v7.0.43148, and used it for at least OptionsPasswordAES in the current version of the product. If an attacker were to know this key, they could decrypt protect information stored in the registry or configuration files of TeamViewer. With versions before v9.x , this allowed for attackers to decrypt the Unattended Access password to the system (which allows for remote login to the system as well as headless file browsing). The latest version still uses the same key for OptionPasswordAES but appears to have changed how the Unattended Access password is stored. While in most cases an attacker requires an existing session on a system, if the registry/configuration keys were stored off of the machine (such as in a file share or online), an attacker could then decrypt the required password to login to the system.

    Source: cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), CISA KEV Catalog

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    teamviewerteamviewer
    • ≤ 14.7.1965
    • —

    Vendors and products

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited

    References & sources

    • community.teamviewer.comt5/Knowledge-Base/tkb-p/Knowledgebase?threadtype=label&labels=S…x_refsource_MISC, Broken link, Vendor advisory
    • whynotsecurity.comblog/teamviewerx_refsource_MISC, Exploit, Third-party advisory
    • twitter.comBlurbdust/status/1224212682594770946?s=20x_refsource_MISC, Third-party advisory
    • community.teamviewer.comt5/Announcements/Specification-on-CVE-2019-18988/td-p/82264x_refsource_MISC, Vendor advisory
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2019-18988government-resource, US government resource
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2019-18988
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2019-18988"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2019-18988.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2019-18988 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>