DotNetNuke (DNN) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (CVE-2017-9822)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org, OSV
What is affected, what to do
DNN (aka DotNetNuke) before 9.1.1 has Remote Code Execution via a cookie, aka "2017-08 (Critical) Possible remote code execution on DNN sites."
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. Update dotnetnuke to version 9.1.1. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- DotNetNuke CMS Fixed in 9.1.1
eq DotNetNuke CMS Fixed in 9.1.1..DotNetNuke CMS Fixed in 9.1.1
- DotNetNuke CMS Fixed in 9.1.1
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
8.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
8.8
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org, OSV
94.8 %
EPSS score
High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.86
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 248.78 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploited
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 8.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 8.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 94.8 %
- High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 99.86
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 7 February 2025
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-94
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This flaw is network-reachable with a very low barrier and yields full code execution as the IIS app pool identity. Public exploit modules have been available for years, which explains its very high exploitation likelihood. CISA explicitly flags it as used in ransomware campaigns. A compromised DNN server is a classic beachhead for webshells, credential theft and subsequent encryption of the internal estate. Typical victims are neglected corporate, municipal and association portals still running old DNN builds. Treat every internet-facing instance below 9.1.1 as critical and fix it immediately. Internal-only instances are high priority but can follow afterwards.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Inventory: Find every DNN/DotNetNuke instance, including legacy microsites, agency-hosted sites and staging. Check the version via
/Install/Version.txt, the admin UI or the assembly version ofDotNetNuke.dllinbin. Anything before 9.1.1 is vulnerable, including NuGetdotnetnuke.core6.0.0 through 7.2.x. - Patch: Upgrade to at least DNN 9.1.1. Further deserialization bypasses of the 9.1.1 fix were disclosed later, so go straight to the currently supported DNN Platform release. Look up the exact version in the vendor advisory. Back up the database and file system first.
- Isolate unpatchable instances: Take instances you cannot patch quickly off the internet. Alternatively, front them with a reverse proxy that strips the
DNNPersonalizationcookie (see Mitigation). - Hunt before you patch: Sweep the web root for new or modified
.aspx,.ashxand.asmxfiles, especially under/Portals/and/DesktopModules/. Treat any webshell as an incident: image the host rather than just cleaning it. - Rotate secrets on suspicion: Regenerate the
machineKey(validationKey/decryptionKey) inweb.config. Change the SQL credentials in the connection string. Reset the DNN host and admin account passwords.
- Inventory: Find every DNN/DotNetNuke instance, including legacy microsites, agency-hosted sites and staging. Check the version via
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- WAF/reverse proxy: Strip the
DNNPersonalizationcookie at the edge, or block requests where its value contains XML type hints. Patterns to match:type=,ObjectDataProvider,ExpandedWrapper,System.Windows.Data,XamlReader,System.Diagnostics.Process. Example ModSecurity rule:SecRule REQUEST_COOKIES:DNNPersonalization "@rx (?i)(ObjectDataProvider|ExpandedWrapper|XamlReader|System\.Diagnostics)" "deny,id:1009822". - IPS/network: Enable a Suricata signature on
http.cookiematchingDNNPersonalizationplusObjectDataProvider. Most commercial rulesets already ship CVE-2017-9822 signatures. Switch those rules to drop rather than alert. - Segmentation: Egress-filter the IIS web servers so they can only reach required destinations (database, update sources). This kills payload staging and reverse shells. Do not allow direct DMZ-to-Active Directory paths.
- Endpoint hardening: Run the IIS app pool as a dedicated
ApplicationPoolIdentitywith no local admin rights. Limit web-root write permissions to the paths DNN strictly needs. Use an ASR rule or EDR policy to block child processes ofw3wp.exe(cmd, powershell, rundll32, certutil). - Database least privilege: Restrict the DNN SQL login to
db_owneron its own database only, neversysadmin. Disablexp_cmdshell.
- WAF/reverse proxy: Strip the
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- IIS access logs: Enable the W3C
cs(Cookie)field, which is off by default. Then hunt for requests whose cookie containsDNNPersonalization=together with<profile>andtype=. These usually target non-existent pages, because the 404 handler is what parses the cookie. SPL:index=iis cs_Cookie="*DNNPersonalization*" (cs_Cookie="*ObjectDataProvider*" OR cs_Cookie="*ExpandedWrapper*"). - Process ancestry (Sysmon EID 1 / Security 4688): Alert when
w3wp.exespawnscmd.exe,powershell.exe,certutil.exe,bitsadmin.exeorwhoami.exe. KQL:DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName =~ "w3wp.exe" and FileName in~ ("cmd.exe","powershell.exe","certutil.exe","whoami.exe"). - File creation (Sysmon EID 11): Alert when
w3wp.exewrites.aspx,.ashx,.asmxor.configfiles into the DNN web root. Sigma shape:Image|endswith: '\w3wp.exe'andTargetFilename|endswith: ['.aspx','.ashx']. - Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): Watch for new outbound connections from the web server to unfamiliar external IPs, such as reverse shells or payload downloads, shortly after suspicious 404 bursts.
- Ransomware precursors: After web exploitation, watch for LSASS access (Sysmon EID 10) and new local accounts (EID 4720). Also watch for lateral movement originating from the web server (EID 4624 logon type 3/10 on downstream hosts).
- IIS access logs: Enable the W3C
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
DNN (aka DotNetNuke) before 9.1.1 has Remote Code Execution via a cookie, aka "2017-08 (Critical) Possible remote code execution on DNN sites."
Source: NVD (NIST), OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| DotNetNuke | DotNetNuke CMS Fixed in 9.1.1 |
|
|
| dnnsoftware | dotnetnuke |
|
|
| nuget | dotnetnuke.core |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-94Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Base
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Entry at MITRE CWE-94
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| Packet Storm | DotNetNuke Cookie Deserialization Remote Code Execution (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
References & sources
- NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9822advisory
- GitHub Security Advisoriesadvisories/GHSA-x2rg-fmcv-crq5advisory
- packetstormsecurity.comfiles/157080/DotNetNuke-Cookie-Deserialization-Remote-Code-Exec…web, x_refsource_MISC, Exploit, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
- dnnsoftware.comcommunity/security/security-centerweb, x_refsource_CONFIRM, Product, Vendor advisory
- securityfocus.com102213web, Vulnerability database, x_refsource_BID, Broken link, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2017-9822government-resource, US government resource
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2017-9822"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2017-9822.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2017-9822 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>