CriticalCVE-2015-0016

    Microsoft Windows TS WebProxy Directory Traversal Vulnerability (CVE-2015-0016)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org

    What is affected, what to do

    Directory traversal vulnerability in the TS WebProxy (aka TSWbPrxy) component in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 allows remote attackers to gain privileges via a crafted pathname in an executable file, as demonstrated by a transition from Low Integrity to Medium Integrity, aka "Directory Traversal Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability."

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2008 eq r2..r2
    • Microsoft Windows Server 2012 eq r2..r2

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    7.8

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    7.8

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: CVE.org

    75.8 %

    EPSS score

    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.52

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    218.23 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploited
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    7.8 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    7.8
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    75.8 %
    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    99.52
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 10 February 2025
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-22

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    This CVE is on KEV because it served as a reliable IE Protected Mode sandbox escape in exploit chains: a browser RCE gives Low Integrity code execution, and CVE-2015-0016 lifts it to Medium Integrity without credentials, requiring only user interaction. Exploitation likelihood is very high — among the most likely CVEs to be exploited — although CISA does not flag known ransomware use. In modern, patched estates the residual risk is low. In KRITIS and OT environments that still run frozen Windows 7/2008 R2 systems with browser access, treat it as high priority. Base your scoring primarily on the number of unpatched EOL hosts that can reach the web.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Inventory legacy hosts: Identify every Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8/8.1, Windows RT/RT 8.1, Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 and Windows Server 2012/2012 R2 machine via CMDB, EDR inventory or the AD operatingSystem attribute. Windows 10/11 and Server 2016+ are not affected. Pay particular attention to OT engineering workstations, HMI clients, jump hosts and kiosks.
      • Apply the security update: Microsoft fixed this vulnerability in Security Bulletin MS15-004 (January 2015). Look up the per-OS KB numbers in the vendor advisory. Verify the fix with Get-HotFix or your WSUS/SCCM compliance report. A host still missing a 2015 patch indicates a broader patch-management failure on that system.
      • Escalate unpatchable or EOL systems: All affected versions are out of support. Treat any host without ESU coverage and without the January 2015 update as critical, and stop web browsing on it immediately.
      • Restrict browsing on affected hosts: This bug is typically chained as an Internet Explorer Protected Mode sandbox escape (Low → Medium Integrity). Disable IE via GPO, or block web access for this asset class at the proxy.
      • Hunt for compromise: On unpatched hosts, retro-hunt in EDR for any process spawned by tswbprxy.exe (see Detection rules). On a hit, isolate the host and reset the logged-on user's credentials.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Configuration (endpoint): Under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Low Rights\ElevationPolicy\, locate the subkey whose AppName is TSWbPrxy.exe. Change its Policy value so it no longer silently elevates to Medium Integrity, or remove the subkey. Test beforehand if you rely on RD Web Access through IE.
      • Application control: Use AppLocker or WDAC to block %SystemRoot%\System32\tswbprxy.exe for standard users where ActiveX-based RD Web Access is not required. Also block execution from user-writable paths (%TEMP%, %APPDATA%, %LOCALAPPDATA%\Low).
      • Network segmentation: Move EOL Windows hosts into a dedicated VLAN and permit outbound HTTP/HTTPS only through an allowlisting proxy, with no direct internet egress.
      • Web gateway filtering: Block exploit-kit-style content (Flash, Java, unknown ActiveX) for these segments at the secure web gateway. The first stage of the chain is usually a browser RCE.
      • Least privilege: Ensure users on these hosts have no local admin rights. That way, reaching Medium Integrity is not a short hop to full system control.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Sysmon EID 1 / Security 4688 – process ancestry: Any child process of tswbprxy.exe is highly suspicious. KQL: DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName =~ "tswbprxy.exe". Sigma shape: ParentImage|endswith: '\tswbprxy.exe' with level high.
      • Integrity-level jump: Watch for the chain iexplore.exe (Low IL) → tswbprxy.exe → cmd.exe/powershell.exe/rundll32.exe or an unknown binary at Medium IL. Use the MandatoryLabel field in 4688 (S-1-16-4096 = Low, S-1-16-8192 = Medium).
      • Path manipulation: Look for traversal sequences in the tswbprxy.exe command line or in its children. SPL: index=sysmon EventCode=1 ParentImage="*\\tswbprxy.exe" OR (Image="*\\tswbprxy.exe" CommandLine="*..\\*").
      • Sysmon EID 11 / 13: Alert on file creation by tswbprxy.exe outside System32, and on registry writes under ...\Low Rights\ElevationPolicy\* by non-installer processes.
      • Proxy telemetry: Correlate IE requests to newly registered or uncategorised domains with a new process making outbound connections shortly afterwards (Zeek conn.log + EDR).

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    Directory traversal vulnerability in the TS WebProxy (aka TSWbPrxy) component in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 allows remote attackers to gain privileges via a crafted pathname in an executable file, as demonstrated by a transition from Low Integrity to Medium Integrity, aka "Directory Traversal Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability."

    Source: NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)

    Vendors and products

    Affected operating systems

    Affected operating systems
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_7—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_8—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_8.1—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_rt—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_rt_8.1—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2008r2
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2012r2
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_server_2012—
    Windowsmicrosoftwindows_vista—

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-22Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

      Base

      The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-22

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited
    Packet StormMS15 004 Microsoft Remote Desktop Services Web Proxy IE Sandbox Escape (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified—
    Exploit-DBEDB-ID 35983 (opens in a new tab)exploit-db.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified—

    References & sources

    • securityfocus.com71965Vulnerability database, x_refsource_BID, Broken link, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • securitytracker.com1031524Vulnerability database, x_refsource_SECTRACK, Broken link, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.comms-windows-cve20150016-priv-esc(99515)Vulnerability database, x_refsource_XF, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • blog.trendmicro.comtrendlabs-security-intelligence/cve-2015-0016-escaping-the-inte…x_refsource_MISC, Exploit
    • exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.comwin-ms15kb3025421-update(99516)Vulnerability database, x_refsource_XF, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • exploit-db.com35983Exploit, x_refsource_EXPLOIT-DB, Exploit, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • secunia.com62076Third-party advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA, Broken link
    • packetstormsecurity.comfiles/130201/MS15-004-Microsoft-Remote-Desktop-Services-Web-Pro…x_refsource_MISC, Exploit, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • docs.microsoft.comMS15-004Vendor advisory, x_refsource_MS, Patch, Vendor advisory
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2015-0016government-resource, US government resource
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2015-0016
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2015-0016"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2015-0016.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2015-0016 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>