Microsoft Silverlight Information Disclosure Vulnerability (CVE-2013-3896)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
Microsoft Silverlight 5 before 5.1.20913.0 does not properly validate pointers during access to Silverlight elements, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted Silverlight application, aka "Silverlight Vulnerability."
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update Microsoft Silverlight to version 5.1.20913.0. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Microsoft Silverlight
lt 5.0..5.1.20913.0
- Microsoft Silverlight
- Fixed in
- Microsoft Silverlight
5.1.20913.0
- Microsoft Silverlight
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
5.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
5.5
CVSS v3
Severity Medium on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org
68.0 %
EPSS score
High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.32
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 206.42 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploited
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 5.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 5.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 68.0 %
- High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 99.32
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: partial
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 10 February 2025
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
On its own this flaw doesn't execute code — it discloses memory contents, and in the wild it was chained by exploit kits with separate memory-corruption bugs to bypass ASLR and then achieve drive-by code execution, which explains its KEV listing and very high exploitation likelihood despite a moderate base severity. Exploitation requires a user to visit a malicious page on a host that still has Silverlight and a browser able to load it; CISA reports no known ransomware use. For most organisations real exposure is low once IE11 is retired, but any Silverlight finding is unsupported software and therefore a compliance gap under NIS2 and ISO 27001 A.8.8 — treat it as high priority and close it by removal, not patching. Pay particular attention to legacy systems in OT-adjacent control rooms and internet-connected terminal server farms.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Build an inventory: Sweep all Windows endpoints and terminal servers for Microsoft Silverlight, e.g.
Get-ItemProperty HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Silverlight -Name Version, or query the Uninstall registry keys forDisplayName -like "*Silverlight*". Reconcile against your CMDB/software inventory. - Uninstall as the primary fix: Silverlight reached end of support in October 2021 and no longer receives security updates. Remove it fleet-wide via your deployment tooling (SCCM/Intune,
Get-Package -Name "Microsoft Silverlight" | Uninstall-Package) rather than merely upgrading. - If removal is not immediately possible: Upgrade to at least version 5.1.20913.0, which fixes CVE-2013-3896. Obtain the installer via the Microsoft advisory — never from third-party download sites.
- Identify dependent business apps: Catalogue internal web applications still serving
.xapcontent (often legacy control-room, video or ERP front ends), notify the application owners, and log them as technical debt in the risk register. - Close the browser path: Silverlight only loads in Internet Explorer 11 or Microsoft Edge IE mode. Review the IE mode site list for entries that require Silverlight and remove any that aren't strictly needed.
- Build an inventory: Sweep all Windows endpoints and terminal servers for Microsoft Silverlight, e.g.
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Endpoint hardening / GPO: Use the Internet Explorer "Add-on Management" policy to disable the Silverlight add-on and enable "Deny all add-ons unless specifically allowed", preventing users from re-enabling it. Back this up with AppLocker/WDAC execution control.
- Web proxy / secure web gateway: Block internet downloads with MIME type
application/x-silverlight-appor the.xapextension; allow only explicitly approved internal hosts. - IPS / network: Ensure exploit-kit landing-page and Silverlight exploit signatures are enabled in your IPS (Suricata/Snort or commercial), and switch the relevant categories from alert to block.
- Exploit mitigation: Because this bug leaks memory addresses to defeat ASLR, enforce Windows Exploit Protection (DEP, mandatory ASLR, CFG) for
iexplore.exeandmsedge.exeto raise the bar for the follow-on code-execution stage. - Least privilege: Run users without local admin rights so that any payload delivered via a successful chain cannot trivially persist or escalate.
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Proxy/web logs: Requests for
.xapfiles or responses withContent-Type: application/x-silverlight-appfrom external, non-allowlisted domains. SPL:index=proxy (uri_path="*.xap" OR content_type="application/x-silverlight-app") NOT dest_domain IN (allowlist) | stats count by src_ip, dest_domain. - Sysmon EID 7 (Image Loaded):
npctrl.dlloragcore.dllloaded intoiexplore.exeormsedge.exeon hosts where inventory says Silverlight should be gone. KQL (Defender):DeviceImageLoadEvents | where FileName in~ ("npctrl.dll","agcore.dll") | summarize by DeviceName, InitiatingProcessFileName. - EDR process ancestry (Sysmon EID 1 / Defender): Suspicious browser child processes shortly after Silverlight content is fetched, e.g.
iexplore.exe → cmd.exe/powershell.exe/rundll32.exe/regsvr32.exe. Sigma shape:ParentImage|endswith: '\iexplore.exe'withImage|endswithmatching a shell/LOLBin list. - Network telemetry (Zeek):
files.logentries withmime_type == "application/x-silverlight-app"followed within minutes by an executable download (application/x-dosexec) to the same host — the classic exploit-kit sequence. - Inventory drift: Reappearance of
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Silverlight(Sysmon EID 12/13) after removal points to shadow IT or deliberate reinstallation.
- Proxy/web logs: Requests for
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Microsoft Silverlight 5 before 5.1.20913.0 does not properly validate pointers during access to Silverlight elements, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted Silverlight application, aka "Silverlight Vulnerability."
Source: NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| microsoft | silverlight |
|
|
Vendors and products
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited |
References & sources
- docs.microsoft.comMS13-087Vendor advisory, x_refsource_MS, Patch, Vendor advisory
- oval.cisecurity.orgoval:org.mitre.oval:def:19003Vulnerability database, signature, x_refsource_OVAL, Broken link
- us-cert.govTA13-288AThird-party advisory, x_refsource_CERT, Third-party advisory, US government resource
- oval.cisecurity.orgoval:org.mitre.oval:def:19055Vulnerability database, signature, x_refsource_OVAL, Broken link
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2013-3896government-resource, US government resource
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2013-3896"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2013-3896.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2013-3896 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>