CriticalCVE-2010-3333

    Microsoft Office Stack-based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability (CVE-2010-3333)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org

    What is affected, what to do

    Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office XP SP3, Office 2003 SP3, Office 2007 SP2, Office 2010, Office 2004 and 2008 for Mac, Office for Mac 2011, and Open XML File Format Converter for Mac allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted RTF data, aka "RTF Stack Buffer Overflow Vulnerability."

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • Microsoft Office eq 2003..2003
    • Microsoft Office eq 2004..2004
    • Microsoft Office eq 2007..2007
    • Microsoft Office eq 2008..2008
    • Microsoft Office eq 2010..2010
    • Microsoft Office eq 2011..2011
    • Microsoft Office eq xp..xp

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    7.8

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    7.8

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: CVE.org

    89.4 %

    EPSS score

    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.78

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    218.65 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploited
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    7.8 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    7.8
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    89.4 %
    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    99.78
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · not automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 10 February 2025
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-787

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    This bug has been a staple of spear-phishing for more than a decade. A crafted RTF document needs only to be opened or previewed by the user, with no authentication and low attack complexity, and it yields full compromise of confidentiality, integrity and availability. Exploitation likelihood is very high, ranking among the highest of all scored CVEs. CISA does not flag known ransomware use. Typical victims are organisations with legacy estates, such as OT-adjacent engineering workstations, line-of-business apps tied to old Office builds, or unmanaged Mac clients. Where such assets exist, treat this as critical and escalate the migration through NIS2 risk management. In fully modernised environments the residual risk is low, but the detection rules remain worthwhile as early warning for phishing campaigns.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Inventory legacy Office: Use SCCM/Intune or EDR inventory to find every host running Office XP, 2003, 2007, 2010, Office for Mac 2004/2008/2011 or the Open XML File Format Converter for Mac. All affected products are long out of support. Treat each hit as a vulnerability-management finding, not just a patch ticket.
      • Apply the patch: A patch is available from the vendor. Look up the bulletin and fixed version in the Microsoft advisory for CVE-2010-3333. Verify the patch level on every legacy install now and close any gaps. Long term, only migration to a supported Office release is sustainable.
      • Isolate unpatched hosts: Move hosts with unpatched legacy Office into a quarantine VLAN without internet or mail access until they are fixed, or uninstall Office on them.
      • Quarantine RTF at the mail gateway: Hold inbound RTF attachments for now. This includes .rtf files and any .doc/.docx/.dot carrying the {\rtf signature. Match on magic bytes, not extension, because attackers routinely rename RTF to .doc.
      • Retro-hunt: Search the last 30 days of mail logs and sandbox verdicts for delivered RTF attachments. Prioritise recipients running legacy Office for a compromise assessment (see Detection rules).
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Configuration (Office): Use GPO to set Word Trust Center "File Block Settings" so RTF is blocked, or opened only in Protected View. On Office 2007/2010, also enforce Outlook's "Read all standard mail in plain text". Outlook renders RTF mail through Word, so the preview pane alone is an attack path.
      • Endpoint hardening (ASR): On Windows hosts running Microsoft Defender, enable these Attack Surface Reduction rules in block mode:
        • D4F940AB-401B-4EFC-AADC-AD5F3C50688A (block Office child processes)
        • 3B576869-A4EC-4529-8536-B80A7769E899 (block Office from creating executable content)
        • 75668C1F-73B5-4CF0-BB93-3ECF5CB7CC84 (block Office process injection)
      • Application control: Use AppLocker or WDAC to deny execution from %TEMP%, %APPDATA% and download folders. RTF exploit shellcode typically drops its payload there.
      • Network/IPS: Deploy a Suricata or Snort rule on SMTP, HTTP and SMB file transfers that fires on RTF content ({\rtf) combined with the pFragments shape-property string. This is the classic exploit pattern for this bug.
      • Least privilege: Run end users without local admin rights. This limits persistence and lateral movement after successful code execution.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Process ancestry (Sysmon EID 1 / EDR): Alert on child processes spawned by WINWORD.EXE.
        • Sigma shape: ParentImage|endswith: '\WINWORD.EXE' and Image|endswith: ['\cmd.exe','\powershell.exe','\wscript.exe','\mshta.exe','\rundll32.exe','\regsvr32.exe']
        • KQL: DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName =~ "winword.exe" and FileName in~ ("cmd.exe","powershell.exe","mshta.exe","rundll32.exe","regsvr32.exe","wscript.exe")
      • File drops (Sysmon EID 11): WINWORD.EXE writing .exe, .dll, .scr or .vbs files into %TEMP% or %APPDATA%. This is often followed by a decoy document opening.
      • Crash artefacts (Windows Application log EID 1000/1001): Application errors with faulting application WINWORD.EXE and faulting module mso.dll. These point to failed or unstable exploit attempts.
      • Mail and file telemetry: Attachments whose extension (.doc) does not match their content (RTF magic {\rtf). Run a YARA rule on {\rtf plus pFragments with an oversized hex value across gateway logs and file shares.
      • Network (Zeek/Suricata): Outbound HTTP/DNS from a host shortly after an RTF attachment was opened, especially to newly registered domains or raw IP addresses.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office XP SP3, Office 2003 SP3, Office 2007 SP2, Office 2010, Office 2004 and 2008 for Mac, Office for Mac 2011, and Open XML File Format Converter for Mac allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted RTF data, aka "RTF Stack Buffer Overflow Vulnerability."

    Source: NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    microsoftoffice
    • 2011
    • xp
    • 2003
    • 2007
    • 2010
    • 2008
    • 2004
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    microsoftopen_xml_file_format_converter
    • —
    • —

    Vendors and products

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-787Out-of-bounds Write

      Base

      The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-787

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited

    References & sources

    • securitytracker.com1024705Vulnerability database, x_refsource_SECTRACK, Broken link, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • securityreason.com8293Third-party advisory, x_refsource_SREASON, Broken link
    • secunia.com42144Third-party advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA, Broken link
    • secunia.com38521Third-party advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA, Broken link
    • vupen.comADV-2010-2923Vulnerability database, x_refsource_VUPEN, Broken link
    • labs.idefense.com20101109 Microsoft Word RTF File Parsing Stack Buffer Overflow VulnerabilityThird-party advisory, x_refsource_IDEFENSE, Broken link
    • oval.cisecurity.orgoval:org.mitre.oval:def:11931Vulnerability database, signature, x_refsource_OVAL, Broken link
    • docs.microsoft.comMS10-087Vendor advisory, x_refsource_MS, Patch, Vendor advisory
    • us-cert.govTA10-313AThird-party advisory, x_refsource_CERT, Third-party advisory, US government resource
    • securityfocus.com44652Vulnerability database, x_refsource_BID, Broken link, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2010-3333government-resource, US government resource
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2010-3333
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2010-3333"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2010-3333.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2010-3333 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>