Not ratedCVE-2009-2631

    Clientless SSL VPN products break web browser domain-based security models (CVE-2009-2631)

    Published Sources: CVE.org

    What is affected, what to do

    Multiple clientless SSL VPN products that run in web browsers, including Stonesoft StoneGate; Cisco ASA; SonicWALL E-Class SSL VPN and SonicWALL SSL VPN; SafeNet SecureWire Access Gateway; Juniper Networks Secure Access; Nortel CallPilot; Citrix Access Gateway; and other products, when running in configurations that do not restrict access to the same domain as the VPN, retrieve the content of remote URLs from one domain and rewrite them so they originate from the VPN's domain, which violates the same origin policy and allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting attacks, read cookies that originated from other domains, access the Web VPN session to gain access to internal resources, perform key logging, and conduct other attacks. NOTE: it could be argued that this is a fundamental design problem in any clientless VPN solution, as opposed to a commonly-introduced error that can be fixed in separate implementations.

    The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below.

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    —

    Priority

    No value is available for this vulnerability.

    —

    CVSS v3

    No value is available for this vulnerability.

    4.8 %

    EPSS score

    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 92.0

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Not rated
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    67.65 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    no public PoC known
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    4.8 %
    Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    92.0
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    —
    Published
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-284

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    Multiple clientless SSL VPN products that run in web browsers, including Stonesoft StoneGate; Cisco ASA; SonicWALL E-Class SSL VPN and SonicWALL SSL VPN; SafeNet SecureWire Access Gateway; Juniper Networks Secure Access; Nortel CallPilot; Citrix Access Gateway; and other products, when running in configurations that do not restrict access to the same domain as the VPN, retrieve the content of remote URLs from one domain and rewrite them so they originate from the VPN's domain, which violates the same origin policy and allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting attacks, read cookies that originated from other domains, access the Web VPN session to gain access to internal resources, perform key logging, and conduct other attacks. NOTE: it could be argued that this is a fundamental design problem in any clientless VPN solution, as opposed to a commonly-introduced error that can be fixed in separate implementations. Therefore a single CVE has been assigned for all products that have this design

    Source: NVD (NIST), cvelistv5

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    aladdinsafenet_securewire_access_gateway
    • —
    • —
    ciscoadaptive_security_appliance
    • —
    • —
    sonicwalle-class_ssl_vpn
    • —
    • —
    sonicwallssl_vpn
    • —
    • —
    stonesoftstonegate
    • —
    • —

    Vendors and products

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-284Improper Access Control

      Pillar

      The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-284

    References & sources

    • kb.cert.orgCERT/CC Advisory
    • security.paloaltonetworks.comVendor-Advisory
    • secunia.com37786Third-party advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA, x_transferred, Vendor advisory
    • www116.nortel.compub/repository/CLARIFY/DOCUMENT/2009/50/025367-01.pdfx_refsource_CONFIRM, x_transferred
    • securityfocus.com20091202 Same-origin policy bypass vulnerabilities in several VPN products reportedMailing list, x_refsource_BUGTRAQ, x_transferred
    • support.nortel.comgo/main.jsp?cscat=BLTNDETAIL&DocumentOID=984744x_refsource_CONFIRM, x_transferred
    • kb.cert.orgVU#261869Third-party advisory, x_refsource_CERT-VN, x_transferred, US government resource
    • securityfocus.com37152Vulnerability database, x_refsource_BID, x_transferred
    • stonesoft.comen/support/security_advisories/2009_03_12.htmlx_refsource_CONFIRM, x_transferred, Vendor advisory
    • vupen.comADV-2009-3569Vulnerability database, x_refsource_VUPEN, x_transferred, Vendor advisory
    • seclists.org20060608 SSL VPNs and securityMailing list, x_refsource_FULLDISC, x_transferred
    • securitytracker.com1023255Vulnerability database, x_refsource_SECTRACK, x_transferred
    • vupen.comADV-2009-3571Vulnerability database, x_refsource_VUPEN, x_transferred, Vendor advisory
    • seclists.org20060609 Re: SSL VPNs and securityMailing list, x_refsource_FULLDISC, x_transferred
    • secunia.com37788Third-party advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA, x_transferred, Vendor advisory
    • secunia.com37696Third-party advisory, x_refsource_SECUNIA, x_transferred, Vendor advisory
    • sonicwall.comus/2123_14882.htmlx_refsource_CONFIRM, x_transferred, Vendor advisory
    • sonicwall.comus/2123_14883.htmlx_refsource_CONFIRM, x_transferred, Vendor advisory
    • vupen.comADV-2009-3570Vulnerability database, x_refsource_VUPEN, x_transferred, Vendor advisory
    • exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.comsslvpn-sameorigin-security-bypass(54523)Vulnerability database, x_refsource_XF, x_transferred
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2009-2631
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2009-2631"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2009-2631.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2009-2631 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>