User Authentication Bypass in VPN Remote Access and Mobile Access (CVE-2026-50751)
Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: pwn.watch, CVE.org, SingCERT
- Actively exploited
- Source: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab), CIRCL KEV, CSA/SingCERT How we classify
- Ransomware
- Public exploit
What is affected, what to do
This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass authentication and establish a VPN connection without a valid password, affecting the IKEv1 key exchange logic in Check Point Security Gateway. It is actively exploited in ransomware campaigns since 2026. Affected products include versions r80.40 to r81.20 of Check Point Security Gateway. Immediate patching to the latest version is critical to mitigate the risk.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
eq R82.10 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 19 or below..R82.10 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 19 or below - Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
eq R82 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 103 or below..R82 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 103 or below - Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
eq R81.20 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 141 or below..R81.20 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 141 or below - Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
eq R81.10, R81, and R80.40..R81.10, R81, and R80.40 - Check Point Spark Firewalls
eq R80.20.X, R81.10.X, and R82.00.X..R80.20.X, R81.10.X, and R82.00.X
- Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
9.3
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
9.3
CVSS v3
Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: pwn.watch, CVE.org, SingCERT
85.3 %
EPSS score
High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.71
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 269.70 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploitedSource: VulnCheck KEV (opens in a new tab), CIRCL KEV, CSA/SingCERT How we classify
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 9.3 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 9.3
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 85.3 %
- High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 99.71
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossaryCWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-287
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This flaw is network-reachable without authentication or user interaction. It hands the attacker a working VPN session inside the perimeter, which is exactly the initial access ransomware operators want, and CISA explicitly flags its use in ransomware campaigns. Exploitation likelihood ranks among the very highest of all tracked CVEs, and typical victims are mid-market and critical-infrastructure operators running Check Point perimeters with remote access VPN. Treat any internet-facing gateway with IKEv1 remote access enabled as critical, with a remediation window measured in hours. Gateways without Remote Access/Mobile Access, or already enforcing IKEv2, rank lower but should still be patched in the next maintenance window.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Inventory exposed gateways: Identify every Check Point Security Gateway (Gaia OS R80.40 through R81.20) with the Remote Access VPN or Mobile Access blade enabled that offers IKEv1 to the internet (UDP 500/4500, Visitor Mode over TCP 443). These come first.
- Apply the vendor hotfix: Patch available from the vendor — look up the exact version in the vendor advisory (Check Point Support Center sk article for CVE-2026-50751). Deploy the matching Jumbo Hotfix or hotfix via CPUSE. For clusters, patch the standby member first, then fail over.
- Disable IKEv1 for remote access now if the patch cannot land within hours. In SmartConsole, enforce IKEv2-only for remote access clients in the Remote Access community or gateway properties. First confirm that no legacy clients or site-to-site peers still depend on IKEv1.
- Review and purge active VPN sessions: Compare currently connected remote access users (
vpn tu, logs) against expected users. Kill unknown or implausible sessions and preserve their Office Mode IPs for forensics. - Assume compromise on any anomaly: If suspicious sessions are found, treat everything reachable from them as potentially compromised. Open an incident, keeping the NIS2 early-warning deadline (24 h) in mind. Rotate service account and domain admin credentials that were reachable from the VPN segment.
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Configuration: Permanently retire IKEv1 for remote access, since it is a deprecated protocol. Require a second factor (MFA via RADIUS/SAML) in addition to certificate authentication, so a bypassed certificate check alone does not grant access.
- Network segmentation: Put the Office Mode IP pool in its own zone and allow only explicit Access Role / Identity Awareness rules to the services users actually need. Never use a blanket "VPN → internal any" rule. Restrict RDP/SMB/LDAP/WinRM from the VPN pool to dedicated jump hosts.
- Perimeter filtering: Where feasible, limit remote access by geo-blocking or source allowlists (e.g. EU only). Allow IKE on UDP 500/4500 only from known site-to-site peers once remote clients run on IKEv2 or Visitor Mode.
- IPS / Threat Prevention: Enable the Check Point IPS protection for this CVE in Prevent mode as soon as it ships in the update package. Have upstream IDS (Suricata) alert on IKE Phase 1 negotiations using IKEv1 major version from unknown sources.
- Least privilege / IAM: Trim remote access groups to what is needed and remove stale user and certificate objects. Audit the internal CA certificates issued to VPN users and revoke unneeded or suspect certificates (refresh the CRL).
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Check Point VPN logs (SmartLog / Log Exporter → SIEM): Remote access logins over IKEv1 with no preceding successful authentication event (password/MFA). Also logins with unknown or odd certificate DNs. SPL shape:
index=checkpoint product="VPN-1*" (action="Log In" OR "Key Install") ike_version=1 | stats count by src, user, office_mode_ip - Session anomalies: The same user connected concurrently from multiple source IPs or countries, off-hours logins, and first-seen source ASNs (VPS/hosting providers). Cross-check against HR and leave status.
- Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata):
conn.logentries for UDP 500/4500 to the gateway from sources that are not known site-to-site peers. Also bursts of IKEv1 Main or Aggressive Mode negotiations from internet IPs (scanning or spraying pattern). - Lateral movement from the VPN pool: Windows Event IDs 4624 (logon type 3/10) and 4625 with source IPs from the Office Mode pool on servers with no business link, plus 4768/4769 with RC4 (Kerberoasting) and SMB/RDP sweeps from the pool. KQL shape:
SecurityEvent | where EventID in (4624,4625) and IpAddress startswith "<OfficeMode-prefix>" | summarize dcount(Computer) by Account, IpAddress - Ransomware precursors: Sysmon EID 1 or EDR process chains showing
rclone.exe,AnyDesk,PsExec,vssadmin delete shadowsorAdFindon hosts reached from the VPN segment.
- Check Point VPN logs (SmartLog / Log Exporter → SIEM): Remote access logins over IKEv1 with no preceding successful authentication event (password/MFA). Also logins with unknown or odd certificate DNs. SPL shape:
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
A logic flow weakness in Remote Access and Mobile Access certificate validation in deprecated IKEv1 key exchange allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass user authentication and establish a remote access VPN connection without a valid user password.
Source: pwn.watch, CISA KEV Catalog, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE), CSA/SingCERT, cvelistv5
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| checkpoint | Quantum Security Gateway |
|
|
| checkpoint | Spark Firewalls |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Other | checkpoint | gaia_embedded | r81.10.17 |
| Other | checkpoint | gaia_embedded | r82.00.10 |
| Other | checkpoint | gaia_embedded | — |
| Other | checkpoint | gaia_os | r81.20 |
| Other | checkpoint | gaia_os | r82 |
| Other | checkpoint | gaia_os | r82.10 |
| Other | checkpoint | gaia_os | — |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-287Improper Authentication
Class
When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct.
Entry at MITRE CWE-287
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| CSA/SingCERT | Critical Vulnerability in Check Point VPN (opens in a new tab)CSA/SingCERT | actively exploited | |
| CIRCL KEV | vulnerability.circl.lu (opens in a new tab) | actively exploited | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-50751 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | Project-CVE-2026-50751 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CheckPoint-CVE-Webscanner (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-50751 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-50751-Check-Point-IKEv1-Authentication-Bypass (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-50751 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-50751---Check-Point-IKEv1-Authentication-Bypass-Exploit (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-50751-Mitigation-Scripts (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | CVE-2026-50751 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified |
References & sources
- support.checkpoint.comresults/sk/sk185033
- blog.checkpoint.comCheck Point Security Gateway — CVE-2026-50751Vendor advisory, pwn-watch
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-50751government-resource
- cert.atCERT.at: Angriffe gegen Checkpoint VPN Lösungen - Hotfix verfügbarcert-at
- pwn.watchpwn.watch: Check Point Security Gateway: Check Point Security Gateway Improper Authentication Vulnerabilitypwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2026-50751pwn-watch
- cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
CISA KEV entry updated9119a7d8…
4 individual changes: Date Added, Due Date, Required Action, Vulnerability Name
Show 4 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Date Added added —2026-06-08Due Date added —2026-06-08Required Action added —2026-06-08Vulnerability Name added —2026-06-08Source identifier: 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725
Record modifiedCISA ADP
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference added —https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-50751Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After CVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:NReference added —https://blog.checkpoint.com/security/check-point-releases-important-hotfix-for-vulnerabilities-in-deprecated-ikev1-vpn-protocol/Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Receivedcheckpoint.com
Weakness type: CWE-287
Description added or changed
New references:Show 3 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description added —A logic flow weakness in Remote Access and Mobile Access certificate validation in deprecated IKEv1 key exchange allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass user authentication and establish a remote access VPN connection without a valid user password.Weakness type (CWE) added —CWE-287Reference added —https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk185033Source identifier: cve@checkpoint.com
One NVD translation into another language is hidden.
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-50751"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-50751.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-50751 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>