CriticalCVE-2023-41265

    Qlik Sense HTTP Tunneling Vulnerability (CVE-2023-41265)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: pwn.watch, CVE.org

    What is affected, what to do

    An HTTP Request Tunneling vulnerability in Qlik Sense allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges and execute HTTP requests on the backend server. This affects Qlik Sense Enterprise for Windows versions up to and including May 2023 Patch 3, February 2023 Patch 7, November 2022 Patch 10, and August 2022 Patch 12. The vulnerability is actively exploited in ransomware campaigns since December 2023. Immediate patching to August 2023 IR, May 2023 Patch 4, February 2023 Patch 8, November 2022 Patch 11, or August 2022 Patch 13 is critical.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • Qlik Sense eq august_2022..august_2022
    • Qlik Sense eq february_2023..february_2023
    • Qlik Sense eq may_2023..may_2023
    • Qlik Sense eq november_2022..november_2022

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    9.6

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    9.6

    CVSS v3

    Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: pwn.watch, CVE.org

    88.2 %

    EPSS score

    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.77

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    255.97 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploited
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    9.6 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    9.6
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    88.2 %
    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    99.77
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    The flaw is network-reachable with low complexity and minimal prerequisites. Its scope change gives an attacker high-impact read/write access to the backend. Chained with CVE-2023-41266, it yields unauthenticated remote code execution. CISA flags known ransomware use, and exploitation likelihood is among the very highest of all tracked CVEs. Typical targets are internet-facing BI platforms in mid-market and industrial organisations, which often hold privileged database connections and serve as a beachhead into the domain. Treat any externally reachable or incompletely patched instance as critical and act immediately; treat internal-only instances as high priority within days.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Check exposure and cut internet access: Inventory every Qlik Sense Enterprise for Windows node, especially internet-facing proxy endpoints (QPS, typically TCP 443/80). Until patching is verified, block external access or restrict it to VPN or an authenticating reverse proxy.
      • Apply the vendor patch: Upgrade to at least August 2023 IR, May 2023 Patch 4, February 2023 Patch 8, November 2022 Patch 11 or August 2022 Patch 13. In practice CVE-2023-41265 is usually chained with the path-traversal flaw CVE-2023-41266. The original fix was later bypassed (CVE-2023-48365), so go to the newest release. Look up the exact version in Qlik's vendor advisory.
      • Assume compromise and verify: For exposed systems patched before late 2023, take forensic snapshots before remediating: memory plus the logs under C:\ProgramData\Qlik\Sense\Log\. Then hunt for persistence such as new local admins, installed remote-access tools or scheduled tasks.
      • Rotate credentials: Renew the Qlik service account credentials, data-connection credentials (DB connectors) and Qlik certificates (QRS/QPS). If the service account is a domain account, review its logons on other hosts.
      • Isolate the host: On any sign of code execution, isolate the Qlik server via EDR. Lateral movement from this entry point is documented in ransomware intrusions.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Network segmentation: Allow internal Qlik service ports (QRS 4242, QPS API 4243, authentication 4244, Engine 4747) only between Qlik nodes and the central node. Expose only the proxy port to client and internet networks.
      • WAF/reverse proxy: Drop requests with ambiguous framing. That covers duplicate or conflicting Content-Length/Transfer-Encoding headers, Transfer-Encoding combined with Content-Length, and a second request line embedded in the body. Enforce strict HTTP/1.1 parsing. Also block URL-encoded traversal (..%2f, %2e%2e) in paths under /resources/.
      • IPS signatures: Enable vendor signatures for CVE-2023-41265, CVE-2023-41266 and CVE-2023-48365 (Suricata ET, Snort/Talos, NGFW vendor) in blocking mode in front of the Qlik proxy.
      • Endpoint hardening: Use EDR rules or ASR/AppLocker to stop Qlik service processes (Repository.exe, Scheduler.exe, Engine.exe, Proxy.exe) from spawning shells (cmd.exe, powershell.exe) or download utilities (curl.exe, certutil.exe, bitsadmin.exe).
      • Least privilege: Run Qlik services under a dedicated, non-admin service account with interactive logon denied. Restrict the server's outbound traffic to required destinations (egress allowlist).
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Process ancestry (Sysmon EID 1 / EDR): A Qlik service spawning a shell. KQL: DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFolderPath has @"\Qlik\Sense\" and FileName in~ ("cmd.exe","powershell.exe","pwsh.exe","certutil.exe","curl.exe","rundll32.exe")
      • Proxy and web access logs: Requests with ..%2f or %2e%2e in /resources/ paths. Also flag anomalous requests carrying Transfer-Encoding that return 2xx without an authenticated session. SPL: index=qlik sourcetype=qlik:proxy uri="*/resources/*" (uri="*..%2f*" OR uri="*%2e%2e*")
      • Post-exploitation persistence: Windows EID 4720/4732 (account created or added to Administrators), EID 7045 (new service, e.g. remote-access tools) and EID 4698 (scheduled task) on Qlik hosts.
      • Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): Outbound connections from the Qlik server to unfamiliar destinations. This includes file-sharing or rclone-style uploads, downloads of .exe, .zip or .ps1 files, and new RDP or SMB sessions from the Qlik server to other internal hosts.
      • Sigma shape: logsource: process_creation, product: windows with ParentImage|contains: '\Qlik\Sense\' and Image|endswith: ['\cmd.exe','\powershell.exe'], level high.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    An HTTP Request Tunneling vulnerability found in Qlik Sense Enterprise for Windows for versions May 2023 Patch 3 and earlier, February 2023 Patch 7 and earlier, November 2022 Patch 10 and earlier, and August 2022 Patch 12 and earlier allows a remote attacker to elevate their privilege by tunneling HTTP requests in the raw HTTP request. This allows them to send requests that get executed by the backend server hosting the repository application. This is fixed in August 2023 IR, May 2023 Patch 4, February 2023 Patch 8, November 2022 Patch 11, and August 2022 Patch 13.

    Source: pwn.watch, CISA KEV Catalog, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), CVE.org (MITRE)

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    qlikqlik_sense
    • august_2022
    • february_2023
    • may_2023
    • november_2022
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —

    Vendors and products

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited

    References & sources

    • community.qlik.comt5/Release-Notes/tkb-p/ReleaseNotes
    • community.qlik.comVendor advisory: Qlik Sensepwn-watch
    • cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2023-41265government-resource
    • pwn.watchpwn.watch: Qlik Sense: 2 exploited vulnerabilities (CVE-2023-41265, CVE-2023-41266)pwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2023-41265pwn-watch
    • NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2023-41266pwn-watch
    • cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2023-41265
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2023-41265"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2023-41265.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2023-41265 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>