Webmin Command Injection Vulnerability (CVE-2019-15107)
Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
An attacker can achieve full control over a system by exploiting a command injection vulnerability in Webmin versions up to 1.920. The vulnerability lies in the `password_change.cgi` script, where the `old` parameter can be manipulated. This vulnerability is actively exploited in ransomware campaigns since its inclusion in the CISA KEV in 2022. Affected organizations should urgently upgrade to the latest version of Webmin to mitigate the risk. The high exploit maturity highlights the urgency of this response.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Webmin
lte *..1.920
- Webmin
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
9.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
9.8
CVSS v3
Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org
99.71 %
EPSS score
High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.95
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 253.92 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploited
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 9.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 9.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 99.71 %
- High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 99.95
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This flaw is network-reachable without authentication or user interaction and yields direct code execution as root. Public exploits and scanner modules have circulated for years, and it ranks among the CVEs most likely to be exploited. CISA flags known use in ransomware campaigns, and botnets and cryptominers also exploit it opportunistically at scale. Typical targets are internet-facing Linux servers, hosting environments and appliances that bundle Webmin. Score any externally reachable instance at ≤ 1.920 as critical and presume it compromised until proven otherwise; handle internally segmented instances with high priority within the emergency patch window.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Inventory: Find every Webmin instance, including those on appliances, hosting panels and forgotten admin VMs. Scan for the default port
10000/tcp(HTTP/HTTPS,MiniServbanner) and check locally via/etc/webmin/version,rpm -q webminordpkg -l webmin. All versions ≤ 1.920 are affected. - Patch: Upgrade to a Webmin release above 1.920; confirm the exact fixed version in the vendor advisory. Install only from the official Webmin repository with signature verification. The flaw originated in a compromise of the build infrastructure, so verify package provenance before installing.
- Isolate if you cannot patch now: Block
10000/tcpat perimeter and internal firewalls for all sources except a dedicated admin jump host. Internet-facing instances come first – this is not a "patch at the weekend" item. - Disable the vulnerable feature: In
/etc/webmin/miniserv.conf, setpasswd_modeto0. This turns off expired-password changes, which is the code path that reachespassword_change.cgi. Then restart Webmin (systemctl restart webminor/etc/webmin/restart). - Compromise assessment: Treat any instance that was reachable before mitigation as potentially compromised, because Webmin runs as
root. Reviewminiserv.log, cron jobs,authorized_keys, and any new users or services. If you find indicators, rebuild the host rather than cleaning it, and rotate every credential stored on it (SSH keys, database and service accounts). - Rotate credentials: Reset Webmin admin and root passwords on affected hosts, even without evidence of compromise.
- Inventory: Find every Webmin instance, including those on appliances, hosting panels and forgotten admin VMs. Scan for the default port
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network segmentation: Run Webmin only on a management VLAN, reachable solely via a bastion host or an MFA-protected VPN. Apply default-deny for
10000/tcpfrom user, DMZ and internet zones. - Application configuration: Restrict the
allow=directive inminiserv.confto admin IPs, so the web server itself enforces an IP allowlist. Keepreferers_none=1and remove unused modules. - WAF/IPS: Block POSTs to
/password_change.cgiwhereold(ornew1/new2) contains shell metacharacters such as|,;,`,$(or&&. Example Suricata rule idea:http.uri; content:"/password_change.cgi"; http.request_body; pcre:"/old=[^&]*(%7c|\||%3b|;|%60||$()/i";`. Enable the vendor IPS signatures for Webmin RCE and set them to blocking mode. - Endpoint hardening: Use EDR policy or AppArmor/SELinux to stop the
miniserv.plPerl process from spawning shells,curl,wget,ncorpython. Restrict egress from Webmin hosts to required update endpoints only. - Retire where possible: If Webmin is not essential, disable it (
systemctl disable --now webmin) and administer the host via key-based SSH. This removes the attack surface permanently.
- Network segmentation: Run Webmin only on a management VLAN, reachable solely via a bastion host or an MFA-protected VPN. Apply default-deny for
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Web server log (
/var/webmin/miniserv.log): Look for POSTs to/password_change.cgi, especially with a/session_login.cgireferer from external sources. SPL example:index=linux sourcetype=webmin uri="/password_change.cgi" method=POST | stats count by src_ip. Treat any hit from a non-admin network as an incident. - Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): Filter
http.logforuri == "/password_change.cgi"on port 10000. Where TLS is terminated, inspect the request body forold=containing URL-encoded pipes (%7c) or semicolons (%3b). - Process ancestry (EDR/Sysmon for Linux EID 1): Flag a
perl/miniserv.plparent spawningsh,bash,dash,curl,wget,nc,python*,base64orchmod. Sigma shape:ParentCommandLine|contains: 'miniserv' AND Image|endswith: ['/sh','/bash','/curl','/wget','/nc']. - auditd: Add
-a always,exit -F arch=b64 -S execve -F uid=0 -k webmin_exec, then filter forexecveevents whoseppidbelongs to theminiservprocess. Also add-w /etc/webmin/ -p wa -k webmin_cfgto catch configuration tampering. - Post-exploitation: Watch for new entries in
/etc/crontab,/var/spool/cron/and~root/.ssh/authorized_keys, and for outbound connections from the Webmin host to unfamiliar IPs (cryptominers, botnet C2, ransomware staging).
- Web server log (
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
An issue was discovered in Webmin <=1.920. The parameter old in password_change.cgi contains a command injection vulnerability.
Source: CISA KEV Catalog, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| webmin | webmin |
|
|
Vendors and products
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| Packet Storm | Webmin 1.920 Remote Command Execution (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
| Packet Storm | Webmin Remote Comman Execution (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
| Packet Storm | Webmin 1.920 password_change.cgi Backdoor (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
| Packet Storm | Webmin 1.920 Remote Code Execution (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
| Exploit-DB | EDB-ID 47230 (opens in a new tab)exploit-db.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | vulhub-webmin-cve-2019-15107 (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified |
References & sources
- webmin.comsecurity.htmlx_refsource_MISC
- exploit-db.comexploits/47230x_refsource_MISC
- pentest.com.trexploits/DEFCON-Webmin-1920-Unauthenticated-Remote-Command-Exec…x_refsource_MISC
- packetstormsecurity.comfiles/154141/Webmin-Remote-Comman-Execution.htmlx_refsource_MISC
- packetstormsecurity.comfiles/154141/Webmin-1.920-Remote-Command-Execution.htmlx_refsource_MISC
- packetstormsecurity.comfiles/154197/Webmin-1.920-password_change.cgi-Backdoor.htmlx_refsource_MISC
- packetstormsecurity.comfiles/154485/Webmin-1.920-Remote-Code-Execution.htmlx_refsource_MISC
- attackerkb.comtopics/hxx3zmiCkR/webmin-password-change-cgi-command-injectionx_refsource_MISC
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2019-15107government-resource
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: active, automatable: yes
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After SSVC assessment changed {"id":"CVE-2019-15107","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-05T20:29:55.177689Z"}{"id":"CVE-2019-15107","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2022-03-11T00:00:00+00:00"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: active, automatable: yes
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After SSVC assessment changed {"id":"CVE-2019-15107","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"slow"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2022-03-11T00:00:00+00:00"}{"id":"CVE-2019-15107","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"active"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-08-05T20:29:55.177689Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2019-15107"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2019-15107.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2019-15107 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>