Not ratedsingcert:ad-2026-011

    Understanding Passwordless Authentication

    Published Sources: SingCERT

    What is affected, what to do

    Passwords have been the primary method of authentication for decades, but they remain a common target for threat actors. It's time to rethink how we verify identities online.

    The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below.

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    —

    Priority

    No value is available for this vulnerability.

    —

    CVSS v3

    No value is available for this vulnerability.

    —

    EPSS score

    No value is available for this vulnerability.

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Not rated
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    24.29 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    no public PoC known
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    —
    Published

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    Passwords have been the primary method of authentication for decades, but they remain a common target for threat actors. It's time to rethink how we verify identities online. Last updated on 18 September 2026 Understanding Passwordless Authentication Passwords have been the primary method of authentication for decades, but they remain a common target for threat actors. Passwordless authentication provides an alternative by allowing users to authenticate without the need for a traditional password. Background Passwords have been the primary method of authentication for decades, but they remain a common target for threat actors. The theft and misuse of passwords, including through phishing, credential stuffing, and data breaches continue to contribute to account compromise. Passwordless authentication offers an alternative way to authenticate users without relying on passwords. It can be implemented using different technologies, each offering different levels of security and user convenience. Why Move Beyond Passwords? There are several well-known challenges when using passwords to secure devices and online accounts. Users often choose weak or predictable passwords, re-use passwords across multiple services, or store passwords insecurely, particularly when they have many passwords to manage. Passwords are also vulnerable to attacks such as: Phishing attempts that trick users into revealing their passwords Credential stuffing using passwords leaked from previous data breaches Credential-stealing malware that captures passwords, records keystrokes or harvests stored credentials Brute-force attacks that attempt to guess passwords Even when passwords are combined with Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), such as one-time authentication codes, the authentication process may remain vulnerable to sophisticated phishing techniques, such as adversary-in-the-middle attacks, that can trick users into providing their passwords and authentication codes. Passwordless authentication can reduce or eliminate reliance on passwords during sign-in and, depending on the technology used, can provide stronger protection against credential theft and phishing attempts. What is Passwordless Authentication? Passwordless authentication refers to methods of authenticating users without requiring them to enter a traditional password during sign-in. Instead of relying on something a user knows (a password), passwordless authentication may use one or more of the following: Something the user has (e.g. a trusted device or security key) Something the user is (e.g. fingerprint or facial recognition) Something the user knows (e.g. a device pin) However, the security properties of passwordless authentication vary depending on the technology used. Not all passwordless authentication methods are resistant to phishing. Types of Passwordless Authentication There are several passwordless authentication methods available but not all provide the same level of protection. Understanding which methods are phishing-resistant can help organisations and users make informed decisions when selecting an authentication method. What does "phishing-resistant" mean? A phishing-resistant authentication method is designed so that authentication credentials cannot be captured and reused by a fake website. Even if a user is tricked into visiting a phishing site, the authentication attempt cannot be successfully completed because the credential is cryptographically bound to the legitimate service or otherwise cannot be replayed. Method Description Phishing-Resistant Why? Passkeys (FIDO2/WebAuthn) Cryptographic credentials that are typically unlocked using biometrics or device PIN. Yes Bound to the legitimate website using public-key cryptography. The private key never leaves the user's device. FIDO2 Security Keys Physical hardware security keys (e.g. USB, NFC, or Bluetooth) used for authentication. Yes Uses FIDO2/WebAuthn to verify the website before authentication, preventing use on phishing websites. Windows Hello for Business Passwordless sign-in using device-bound credentials, unlocked using biometrics or PIN. Yes Uses public-key cryptography and device-bound credentials instead of reusable passwords. Smart Cards / Certificate-Based Authentication Authentication using certificates and associated private key stored on smart cards or managed devices. Yes Private keys remain securely stored on the smart card or managed device and are never transmitted. Push Authentication Users approve sign-in requests through a trusted mobile application. No Users may be tricked into approving fraudulent requests. Magic Links Users authenticate by clicking a unique link sent to their email. No The emailed link acts as the credential and may be intercepted or used if a user is deceived. SMS One-Time Passwords (OTP) Authentication using SMS verification codes. No Users can be tricked into entering OTPs on phishing websites, and SMS is vulnerable to SIM swapping. Note: Passkeys and FIDO2 security keys are both based on the FIDO2/WebAuthn standards and provide phishing-resistant authentication. The main difference is where the credential is stored. Passkeys are typically stored securely on a user's phone, computer or password manager and can synchronise across trusted devices. FIDO2 security keys store the credential on a dedicated hardware device (such as a USB, NFC or Bluetooth security key) that must be physically present during authentication. Passkeys are increasingly being adopted across consumer and enterprise services due to their phishing-resistant authentication and ease of use. Benefits of Passwordless Authentication For Individuals Passwordless authentication can provide: Easier and faster sign-in experience Reduced need to remember and manage passwords Reduced risks associated with weak or reused passwords Better protection against phishing when phishing-resistant methods, such as passkeys, are used For Organisations Passwordless authentication can provide: Reduced risks associated with password-based attacks that exploit weak, reused or stolen passwords Fewer password reset requests and lower associated helpdesk costs Residual Risks Although passwordless authentication can reduce risks associated with passwords, it does not eliminate all cyber risks. The level of protection depends on the authentication method used and how it is implemented. Attackers may still compromise authenticated sessions or exploit other weaknesses in the authentication and account lifecycle. For example: Malware on a compromised device may abuse an authenticated session. Attackers may steal session cookies after successful authentication and use them to gain unauthorised access. Weak account recovery processes may undermine the protections provided by passwordless authentication. Users may still be deceived through social engineering techniques that manipulate them into revealing sensitive information or performing actions that compromise their accounts. Conclusion Passwordless authentication can reduce the risks associated with traditional password-based authentication. However, not all passwordless authentication methods provide the same level of security properties. When choosing a passwordless authentication method, factors such as phishing resistance, compatibility with existing systems, account recovery and device requirements should be considered. Where supported, phishing-resistant methods should be prioritised, alongside other security measures to protect against threats that occur before, during and after authentication. References https://www.paloaltonetworks.sg/cyberpedia/what-is-passwordless-authentication https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/paper/traditional-user-and-fido2-credentials-personal-use

    Source: CSA/SingCERT