Highosv:MAL-2026-17408

    Malicious code in whalibmob (npm)

    Published Sources: OSV (Schadpakete)

    • Malicious package

    What is affected, what to do

    Uninstall the package, isolate affected environments and rotate credentials that were available during installation.

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Malicious package

    npmwhalibmob

    “whalibmob” is registered as malicious in the npm repository. Anyone who installed the package should uninstall it immediately, isolate affected environments and rotate credentials that were present during installation.

    Affected versions (10)

    • 5.33.18
    • 5.33.19
    • 5.33.20
    • 5.33.21
    • 5.33.22
    • 5.33.23
    • 5.33.26
    • 5.33.28
    • 5.33.29
    • 5.33.30

    purl: pkg:npm/whalibmob

    Sources (10)

    • amazon-inspectorIN-MAL-2026-021986

      Versions from this source: 5.33.18

      sha256: 30872166985b02e9f5caef507e1ca278b72cb39a7c5590efde672fc66e406daa

    • amazon-inspectorIN-MAL-2026-021984

      Versions from this source: 5.33.30

      sha256: 944961a4308a7d6dd2100db691cf7ca5f0dc00433269ab48aa2fda11bad3d512

    • amazon-inspectorIN-MAL-2026-021985

      Versions from this source: 5.33.28

      sha256: ccd81d6a3ce15d6530e0c52c3fef94cf7a38c08c693b0edb099de358f95be4ea

    • amazon-inspectorIN-MAL-2026-022039

      Versions from this source: 5.33.23

      sha256: a053d57b5c6047e14d0e5df195f2a023fac53c3cf6be80f96ee662bdbb17d3bc

    • amazon-inspectorIN-MAL-2026-022046

      Versions from this source: 5.33.19

      sha256: b0e8ca28c57a049725bcf8c033b6aa6080e63e1aa9f58e9174588f1dd76e5e9c

    • amazon-inspectorIN-MAL-2026-022044

      Versions from this source: 5.33.20

      sha256: c4ae8297cce91c6d485eb97be14cf70dcc5fd5c881dd31c1a99ec32bcd3e832c

    • amazon-inspectorIN-MAL-2026-022040

      Versions from this source: 5.33.29

      sha256: 091dbfc5e015710d33beb4bb706ba3bf44808312ba9f4e68b6bb389225d14911

    • amazon-inspectorIN-MAL-2026-022042

      Versions from this source: 5.33.26

      sha256: 3d06867a2e52fdcaf03945b058cae5aee0901a96c1805e970de19a306a2f9402

    • amazon-inspectorIN-MAL-2026-022043

      Versions from this source: 5.33.22

      sha256: 4b5f53e9a813cedbd91b8a829f274bd9aaeacb55d8de42df3e3e1463e167bc72

    • amazon-inspectorIN-MAL-2026-022045

      Versions from this source: 5.33.21

      sha256: 58f586f9f306afb04550c568c3f61760f1e8b535b2b24a4d6d45a2715c2b478b

    The OSSF `malicious-packages` namespace lists packages flagged as malicious by static analysis or sandbox detonation. An entry here is a confirmed finding, not a suspicion.

    Metrics

    —

    Priority

    No value is available for this vulnerability.

    —

    CVSS v3

    No value is available for this vulnerability.

    —

    EPSS score

    No value is available for this vulnerability.

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    High
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    30.00 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    no public PoC known
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    —
    Published

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    This package is part of a large family (100+ identified as of September 2026) of near-identical forks of the Baileys WhatsApp Web library that inject a covert channel-subscription action into the WhatsApp socket layer. On connect, the injected code issues an authenticated w:mex FOLLOW query (query_id 7871414976211147) against one or more attacker-chosen WhatsApp Channel/Newsletter JIDs, using the installer's own authenticated WhatsApp session -- silently subscribing the victim's account to channels it never asked to join.

    The target JID(s) are hidden from casual source review via one of several obfuscation techniques observed across the family: a plain string literal, base64 encoding, base64+XOR, or a char-code array reconstructed at runtime. Some variants instead fetch a mutable, attacker-controlled remote JSON/JS list of target JIDs from GitHub or another host at runtime, letting the target list change after installation without a new npm publish. Every sample in the family shares the same underlying mechanism (a wrapped/patched socket-connect routine that fires the FOLLOW query some seconds after connect), even though the package name, JID value(s), and obfuscation/delivery method differ per fork.

    The malicious action abuses the installer's own authenticated WhatsApp session to gain reach and subscribers for attacker-controlled channels; it does not exfiltrate credentials, establish persistence, or execute arbitrary remote code.

    Affected package: whalibmob (npm), version(s): 5.33.5, 5.33.4, 5.33.3, 5.33.2, 5.32.2, 5.32.1, 5.32.0, 5.30.0, 5.29.6, 5.29.5, 5.29.4, 5.29.3, 5.29.2, 5.29.1, 5.29.0, 5.28.0, 5.25.0, 5.24.2, 5.24.1, 5.24.0.


    -= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-

    Source: amazon-inspector (091dbfc5e015710d33beb4bb706ba3bf44808312ba9f4e68b6bb389225d14911)

    Pattern-based rules matched keyword co-occurrences in several files of this package: lib/MediaService.js imports fs/http/https and performs fs.readFileSync and https.request calls; lib/Registration.js contains the token 'ping' at multiple lines; lib/WebVersion.js references 'curl' and uses https.get alongside 'ps' tokens; and lib/socks.js references 'curl', 'POST', and 'hostname'. None of these matches, on their own, demonstrates reading installer-side secrets (such as ~/.aws, ~/.ssh, ~/.npmrc, environment credential variables, browser profile stores, or wallet files) and sending them to an attacker-controlled destination, nor install-time code execution of fetched content, nor a backdoor channel. No lifecycle script (preinstall/install/postinstall/prepare) is cited as invoking the flagged code paths at install time. No hardcoded attacker C2 endpoint, no known-bad-infrastructure host, no obfuscated destination, and no credential-grade file read is identified in the available evidence. The package name's similarity to common library naming conventions and the presence of generic network/filesystem primitives are not themselves attack indicators.

    Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)