MediumCVE-2026-115913

    vLLM: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CVE-2026-115913)

    Published Last modified Sources: Hersteller, CVE.org, OSV

    What is affected, what to do

    An exploit is publicly available. Update vLLM to version 0.32.0.

    Affected
    • vLLM lt *..0.32.0
    Fixed in
    • vLLM 0.32.0

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    6.5

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3

    6.5

    CVSS v3

    Severity Medium on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: Hersteller, CVE.org, OSV

    0.3 %

    EPSS score

    Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 26.1

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Medium
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    67.93 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    PoC (publicly reported)
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    6.5 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    6.5
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    0.3 %
    Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    26.1
    Elevated — this CVE ranks above at least 10% of all CVEs scored today.
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    —
    Published
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-770

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    Summary

    The Phi-4 multimodal audio encoder (phi4mm_audio.py / phi4mm_utils.py) runs its conformer attention in eager mode by default: the official HF config of microsoft/Phi-4-multimodal-instruct does not set use_pt_scaled_dot_product_attention, so the default False applies (phi4mm_audio.py:166, :876; phi4mm_utils.py:1669). The eager path fully materializes the attention probability matrix of shape [n_chunks, 16, 500, 500] per layer — and then stores it on the module: self.attn = attn (phi4mm_utils.py:1802, a torch.jit.Attribute declared at :1693), keeping a live reference for every one of the 24 encoder layers.

    The only gates on audio length are the server-side limits VLLM_MAX_AUDIO_CLIP_FILESIZE_MB=25 and VLLM_MAX_AUDIO_DECODE_DURATION_S=600 (envs.py:83-84) — i.e. a 10-minute clip is a legal input by default. A 600 s clip becomes ~60,000 mel frames, which the encoder unfolds into 500-frame chunks (phi4mm_audio.py:996, max_seq_len = 500), giving n_chunks ≈ 120. Each layer therefore materializes a 120×16×500×500 matrix (~1–2 GiB depending on dtype), and the module attribute keeps all completed layers' matrices alive, so GPU memory climbs monotonically within a single request until an allocation fails.

    Verified end-to-end on the official vllm/vllm-openai:v0.31.0 image: one 19.2 MB silent 600 s WAV → worker torch.OutOfMemoryError: CUDA out of memory. Tried to allocate 2.29 GiB ... 501.75 MiB free ... 22.09 GiB allocated by PyTorch inside get_audio_features (phi4mm_audio.py:1279 → :1332 → phi4mm_utils.py:1386) → EngineCore encountered a fatal error → API EngineDeadError → whole server down; /health refuses connections. Total time from request to dead service: ~6 seconds.

    A secondary effect: because self.attn persists on the module after the request ends, the matrices of the last audio request stay resident indefinitely (observed +50 MiB pinned after a single 5 s control request); they are only overwritten by the next audio request, so the resident footprint equals the largest audio processed since startup.

    Details

    1. Root cause. MultiHeadedAttention.forward_attention in eager mode computes attn = masked_softmax(scores, mask) and unconditionally executes self.attn = attn (phi4mm_utils.py:1795-1802). The attribute is a leftover inference/debug hook (used by torch.jit.Attribute(None, Tensor | None) at :1693); in serving it serves no purpose but pins the full [batch·chunks, heads, T, T] tensor per layer past both the layer's forward and the request's lifetime. The SDP attention branch (use_pt_scaled_dot_product_attention=True) never materializes this matrix — but the HF config does not enable it and the code default is False.

    2. Why one request suffices. The conformer chunks long audio to max_seq_len = 500 frames (phi4mm_audio.py:996). Duration is bounded only by VLLM_MAX_AUDIO_DECODE_DURATION_S=600, so n_chunks reaches ~120 for a maximal clip. With 16 heads and fp32 scores, one layer's attention tensor is ~1.8 GiB (the observed failing allocation was 2.29 GiB, consistent with the scores+bias materialization). The encoder has num_blocks=24, attention_heads=16, attention_dim=1024, time_reduction=8 (HF config). Weights plus a handful of retained per-layer matrices exhaust the ~2.3 GiB headroom that --gpu-memory-utilization 0.9 leaves on a 24 GB card — mid-forward, on the first request.

    4. Deployment reality. --trust-remote-code is the documented, standard way to serve this model (the HF model card instructs it), so the finding applies to default deployments. The crash is deterministic, not load-dependent: scheduler stats at death show a single running request and near-zero KV cache usage.

    Impact

    Any unauthenticated client that can reach the chat/completions API of a default deployment serving Phi-4-multimodal-instruct (or any model reusing this audio tower) can kill the entire engine with one request carrying a perfectly legal 10-minute audio clip (silent noise suffices — no crafted content needed). Full denial of service, requiring a process restart. On GPUs with more headroom (e.g. 80 GB at default utilization) a single request may survive, but the eager path still materializes GiB-scale per-layer matrices and retains the last request's tensors indefinitely, so a few sequential max-length requests — or normal traffic following one — achieve the same result.

    Relation to prior art: the only public Phi-4-mm advisory we found, GHSA-vc6m-hm49-g9qg, concerns a CPU-side quadratic-cost path — different subsystem, different mechanism. GitHub search for "phi4mm audio OOM/memory" (31 results, 2026-10-08) shows no report of this attention-retention issue; main (2026-10-08) is unchanged.

    Suggested remediation (any one breaks the chain; 1+2 recommended):

    1. Remove self.attn = attn from the serving path (or gate it behind an explicit debug/output_attentions flag) so attention matrices are freed when the layer returns.
    2. Default use_pt_scaled_dot_product_attention to True (flash/SDPA kernels never materialize the [B, H, T, T] matrix); keep eager only as an opt-in.
    3. Additionally bound the encoder input (frames or duration) for this model so the eager path cannot reach GiB-scale single-layer allocations even if enabled.

    This advisory was fixed in MR60614.

    Source: GitHub Security Advisories, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    vllm-projectvllm
    • < 0.32.0
    • 0.32.0
    vllmvllm
    • 0.31.0 – < 0.32.0
    • 0.32.0
    pipvllm
    • < 0.32.0
    • 0.32.0
    pypivllm
    • 0.6.5
    • 0.28.0
    • 0.5.1
    • 0.18.1
    • 0.14.0
    • 0.15.0
    • 0.31.0
    • 0.21.0
    • 0.6.4.post1
    • 0.20.1
    • 0.1.4
    • 0.16.0
    • 0.2.1
    • 0.7.1
    • 0.2.1.post1
    • 0.27.0
    • 0.19.0
    • 0.10.0
    • 0.4.3
    • 0.4.0
    • 0.13.0
    • 0.1.0
    • 0.11.1
    • 0.9.2
    • 0.6.1.post2
    • 0.5.0.post1
    • 0.6.3.post1
    • 0.20.0
    • 0.2.2
    • 0.1.5
    • 0.27.1
    • 0.6.1
    • 0.5.5
    • 0.5.3
    • 0.5.2
    • 0.17.1
    • 0.24.0
    • 0.5.0
    • 0.4.0.post1
    • 0.1.2
    • —
    • 0.1.3
    • 0.8.0
    • 0.3.1
    • 0.23.0
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • 0.32.0
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —

    Vendors and products

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-770Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

      Base

      The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-770

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    Reference tagged as exploitgithub.com (opens in a new tab)PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified—

    References & sources

    • github.comvllm-project/vllm/commit/3d52578e13454de0bb8352cac988347cdcc899…x_refsource_MISC, Patch, web
    • github.comvllm-project/vllm/pull/60614x_refsource_MISC, Patch, web
    • github.comvllm-project/vllm/releases/tag/v0.32.0x_refsource_MISC, Release notes, web
    • github.comvllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-8397-8qf6-f2gmx_refsource_CONFIRM, Exploit, Patch, Vendor advisory, web
    • NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2026-115913advisory
    • github.comvllm-project/vllmpackage

    Changes to this CVE

    Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).

    1. Initial analysis by NVDNVD

      Show 5 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Product configurationadded
      —
      OR *cpe:2.3:a:vllm:vllm:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions from (including) 0.31.0 up to (excluding) 0.32.0
      Reference typeadded
      —
      GitHub, Inc.: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/3d52578e13454de0bb8352cac988347cdcc89928 Types: Patch
      Reference typeadded
      —
      GitHub, Inc.: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/60614 Types: Patch
      Reference typeadded
      —
      GitHub, Inc.: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/releases/tag/v0.32.0 Types: Release Notes
      Reference typeadded
      —
      GitHub, Inc.: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-8397-8qf6-f2gm Types: Exploit, Patch, Vendor Advisory

      Source identifier: nvd@nist.gov

    2. ReceivedGitHub

      Show 8 original changes
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      Descriptionadded
      —
      vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.32.0, the Phi-4 multimodal audio encoder in phi4mm_audio.py and phi4mm_utils.py uses eager attention by default, allowing a remote client to submit one legal long audio clip that causes MultiHeadedAttention.forward_attention to materialize and retain full attention matrices in self.attn. The scaled dot-product attention branch does not materialize these matrices. The resulting quadratic GPU-memory use can cause an out-of-memory condition and terminate EngineCore for all users. This issue is fixed in version 0.32.0.
      CVSSadded
      —
      AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
      Weakness type (CWE)added
      —
      CWE-770
      Affected versions (publisher)added
      —
      New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/115xxx/CVE-2026-115913.json">CVE-2026-115913</a>
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/3d52578e13454de0bb8352cac988347cdcc89928
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/60614
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/releases/tag/v0.32.0
      Referenceadded
      —
      https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-8397-8qf6-f2gm

      Source identifier: security-advisories@github.com

    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2026-115913
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-115913"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-115913.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-115913 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>