HighCVE-2026-113711

    Apostrophe: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CVE-2026-113711)

    Published Last modified Sources: OSV, Hersteller, CVE.org

    What is affected, what to do

    Update Apostrophe to version 4.33.0, @apostrophecms Import-export to version 3.7.0.

    Affected
    • Apostrophe lt *..4.33.0
    • @apostrophecms Import-export lt *..3.7.0
    Fixed in
    • Apostrophe 4.33.0
    • @apostrophecms Import-export 3.7.0

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    7.5

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3

    7.5

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: OSV, Hersteller, CVE.org

    0.5 %

    EPSS score

    Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 43.8

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    High
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    82.88 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    no public PoC known
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    7.5 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    7.5
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    0.5 %
    Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    43.8
    High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    —
    Published
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-400, CWE-770

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    Summary

    A potential unauthenticated denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the chunked import upload path used by @apostrophecms/import-export.

    The affected import API routes invoke:

    self.apos.http.bigUploadMiddleware()

    before the actual import handler performs its authentication check.

    Because no authorize callback is supplied to bigUploadMiddleware(), unauthenticated requests can reach the aposBigUpload start, chunk, and end operations before the later req.user check rejects the import.

    As a result, an unauthenticated remote attacker can create server-side upload state, write chunk data to upload storage, trigger temporary-file processing, and cause attacker-controlled cleanup operations before authentication is enforced.

    Affected Component

    Package:

    @apostrophecms/import-export

    Confirmed affected version:

    3.6.2

    Potential earlier affected versions:

    The issue may affect earlier 3.x releases in which the current big-upload-based import implementation is present. I have not yet fully verified the exact introduction version and recommend that the maintainers confirm the affected version range.

    Vulnerability Type

    Primary:

    CWE-400 — Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

    Related:

    CWE-306 — Missing Authentication for Critical Function

    CWE-770 — Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

    Technical Details

    The page import route registers the following middleware chain:

    packages/import-export/modules/@apostrophecms/import-export-page/index.js

    importExportImport: [
      self.apos.http.bigUploadMiddleware(),
      async (req) => {
        return self.apos.modules['@apostrophecms/import-export']
          .import(req, self.__meta.name);
      }
    ]
    

    No authorize callback is passed to bigUploadMiddleware().

    The bigUploadMiddleware() implementation explicitly supports an authorize callback and performs that authorization before processing the aposBigUpload protocol when supplied.

    Without that callback, requests containing:

    aposBigUpload[type]=start

    aposBigUpload[type]=chunk

    or

    aposBigUpload[type]=end

    are processed immediately.

    The actual authentication check occurs later in:

    packages/import-export/lib/methods/import.js

    async import(req, moduleName) {
      if (!req.user) {
        throw self.apos.error('forbidden');
      }
    

    This means authentication occurs only after the chunked-upload middleware has already performed server-side work.

    Attack Flow

    1. Start

    An unauthenticated attacker submits an aposBigUpload[type]=start request.

    The server generates an upload ID and stores attacker-supplied upload metadata, including the declared chunks count.

    2. Chunk

    The attacker can upload chunk data.

    bigUploadChunk() copies attacker-controlled data into:

    /big-uploads/<id>-<n>-<chunk>

    3. End

    The attacker sends an aposBigUpload[type]=end request.

    bigUploadEnd() begins processing the upload and creates temporary files before invoking the downstream import handler.

    Only after this processing completes does execution reach the later authentication check in import().

    4. Cleanup amplification

    The attacker-controlled chunks value is also used by bigUploadCleanupOne():

    for (const { chunks } of Object.values(bigUpload.files)) {
      for (let i = 0; (i < chunks); i++) {
        await ufs.remove(...);
      }
    }
    

    No small upper bound on the declared chunk count appears to be enforced at upload initialization.

    This allows an unauthenticated attacker to increase the number of filesystem cleanup operations performed for an upload.

    Proof of Concept

    The following reproduction was performed only against an isolated test environment.

    Start an upload without authentication

    curl -s -X POST \
      'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/page/importExportImport?aposBigUpload[type]=start' \
      -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
      --data '{"files":{"file":{"name":"evil.tar.gz","size":4,"type":"application/gzip","chunks":1}}}'
    

    The server returns an upload ID despite the request having no authenticated session.

    Upload a chunk

    printf 'PWN!' >/tmp/chunk.bin
    
    curl -s -X POST \
      'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/page/importExportImport?aposBigUpload[type]=chunk&aposBigUpload[id]=<ID>&aposBigUpload[n]=0&aposBigUpload[chunk]=0' \
      -F 'chunk=@/tmp/chunk.bin;type=application/octet-stream'
    

    The request succeeds and causes server-side upload storage to be used.

    Finalize the upload

    curl -i -X POST \
      'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/@apostrophecms/page/importExportImport?aposBigUpload[type]=end&aposBigUpload[id]=<ID>'
    

    Observed behavior:

    • start returns HTTP 200 and an upload ID without authentication.
    • chunk returns HTTP 200 and results in server-side chunk storage.
    • end eventually reaches the downstream authentication check and is rejected.
    • However, the server-side big-upload processing has already occurred before that authentication rejection.

    In my isolated harness:

    • chunks=1 resulted in one cleanup removal attempt.
    • chunks=50 resulted in 50 cleanup removal attempts.

    This demonstrates that the attacker-controlled chunk count directly influences server-side cleanup work.

    Security Impact

    The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause server-side storage and filesystem operations that should only be reachable by authorized import users.

    Possible consequences include:

    • Consumption of upload and temporary storage.
    • Creation of server-side upload state by unauthenticated users.
    • Repeated filesystem I/O.
    • Cleanup amplification based on attacker-controlled chunk counts.
    • Potential service degradation or denial of service when the attack is repeated or sufficiently amplified.

    Root Cause

    Authentication is enforced in the downstream import handler rather than before the chunked-upload middleware.

    The middleware itself already supports an authorize callback specifically for preventing unauthorized use of the big-upload functionality.

    Suggested Remediation

    Require authentication before any aposBigUpload operation is processed.

    For example:

    • Pass an appropriate authorize callback to bigUploadMiddleware() on all import routes.
    • Reject unauthenticated users before start, chunk, or end.
    • Enforce reasonable limits on declared chunk counts.
    • Validate declared size against actual uploaded data.
    • Introduce per-user and global storage/rate limits.
    • Ensure temporary files are removed when downstream processing fails.
    • Add regression tests confirming that anonymous start, chunk, and end requests are rejected before upload state or files are created.

    Relevant reviewed commit:

    d3ff8c9bb001be1acf7fdc3f035190250ac64b45

    Researcher Credit

    Kai Zhi

    GitHub:

    https://github.com/kaizhi888

    Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities), GitHub Security Advisories, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST)

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    @apostrophecmsimport-export
    • < 3.7.0
    • 3.7.0
    apostrophecmsapostrophe
    • < 4.33.0
    • 4.33.0
    npm@apostrophecms/import-export
    • —
    • < 3.7.0
    • 3.7.0
    • 3.7.0
    npmapostrophe
    • —
    • < 4.33.0
    • 4.33.0
    • 4.33.0

    Vendors and products

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-400Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

      Class

      The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-400
    • CWE-770Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

      Base

      The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-770

    References & sources

    • github.comapostrophecms/apostrophe/commit/9500b8b0e1d630d5e07fbb5fd2c25ed…x_refsource_MISC, web
    • github.comapostrophecms/apostrophe/commit/f84fd41cbf6c22eb8d0008fc9c25df1…x_refsource_MISC, web
    • github.comapostrophecms/apostrophe/releases/tag/apostrophe@4.33.0x_refsource_MISC, web
    • github.comapostrophecms/apostrophe/security/advisories/GHSA-86wm-68pq-5jwqx_refsource_CONFIRM, web
    • NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2026-113711advisory
    • github.comapostrophecms/apostrophepackage

    Reanalysis & status changes

    Chronological NVD audit events for this CVE — reanalyses, CVSS updates, CPE diffs.

    1. CVE Modified134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

      • Reference: after https://github.com/apostrophecms/apostrophe/security/advisories/GHSA-86wm-68pq-5jwq
      • SSVC: after {"id":"CVE-2026-113711","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"poc"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technical…
    2. New CVE Receivedsecurity-advisories@github.com

      • Description: after ApostropheCMS is an open-source Node.js content management system. Prior to 4.33.0 of ApostropheCMS and 3.7.0 of the import-export module, import routes invoke bigUploadMiddleware without an early authorize callback, allowing unauthenticated requests to perform upload initialization, chunk storage, temporary processing, and attacker-declared cleanup work before the later user check rejects the import. This issue is fixed in ApostropheCMS 4.33.0 and import-export 3.7.0.
      • CVSS V3.1: after AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
      • CWE: after CWE-400
      • CWE: after CWE-770
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2026-113711
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-113711"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-113711.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-113711 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>