diagnostics-prometheus: Incorrect Authorization (CVE-2026-100560)
Published Last modified Sources: BSI
What is affected, what to do
OpenClaw versions before 2026.8.1 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability where Allow Always approvals for exact commands persist as path-only grants on macOS and Linux. Attackers can reuse the same executable with different arguments to execute commands without triggering new approval prompts, potentially accessing files or internal services.
Update OpenClaw to version 2026.8.1.
- Affected
- OpenClaw
lt *..2026.8.1
- OpenClaw
- Fixed in
- OpenClaw
2026.8.1
- OpenClaw
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.7
XIEM Effective CVSS
Highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v4
7.5
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: BSI
0.6 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 48.2
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 64.27 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.7 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.5
CVSS v4
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.7
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.6 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 48.2
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: none known · not automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 30 September 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-863
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
OpenClaw versions before 2026.8.1 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability where Allow Always approvals for exact commands persist as path-only grants on macOS and Linux. Attackers can reuse the same executable with different arguments to execute commands without triggering new approval prompts, potentially accessing files or internal services.
Source: BSI WID Portal
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| openclaw | diagnostics-prometheus |
|
|
| openclaw | discord |
|
|
| openclaw | feishu |
|
|
| openclaw | googlechat |
|
|
| openclaw | line |
|
|
| openclaw | matrix |
|
|
| openclaw | msteams |
|
|
| OpenClaw | OpenClaw |
|
|
| OpenClaw | OpenClaw iOS |
|
|
| openclaw | slack |
|
|
| openclaw | voice-call |
|
|
| openclaw |
|
| |
| Open Source | OpenClaw |
|
|
| npm | @openclaw/feishu |
|
|
| npm | @openclaw/googlechat |
|
|
| npm | @openclaw/matrix |
|
|
| npm | @openclaw/msteams |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Other | Sonstiges | — | |
| Linux | UNIX | — |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-863Incorrect Authorization
Class
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
Entry at MITRE CWE-863
References & sources
- github.comOpenClaw Security Advisories vom 2026-09-10BSI
- github.comGitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-89cw-7452-cfrf)Vendor advisory, euvd
- vulncheck.comVulnCheck Advisory: OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Authorization Bypass via trajectory exportThird-party advisory, euvd
- github.comGitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-5x6q-wg56-rxg8)Vendor advisory, euvd
- vulncheck.comVulnCheck Advisory: OpenClaw 2026.7.2 before 2026.9.2 Authentication Bypass via Voice TranscriptThird-party advisory, euvd
- github.comGitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-5m4g-88rg-69pj)Vendor advisory, euvd
- vulncheck.comVulnCheck Advisory: OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Sandbox Policy Bypass via MCP LoopbackThird-party advisory, euvd
- github.comGitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-pjjr-5qhr-5w6r)Vendor advisory, euvd
- vulncheck.comVulnCheck Advisory: OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Authorization Bypass via Codex InstallThird-party advisory, euvd
- github.comGitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-8xxh-v4vc-qvm4)Vendor advisory, euvd
- vulncheck.comVulnCheck Advisory: OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Remote Code Execution via cron toolThird-party advisory, euvd
- github.comGitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-58qx-6m8p-wh2j)Vendor advisory, euvd
- vulncheck.comVulnCheck Advisory: OpenClaw Slack before 2026.8.1 Authentication Bypass via Group DMThird-party advisory, euvd
- github.comGitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-rrxp-5mx8-mvhh)Vendor advisory, euvd
- vulncheck.comVulnCheck Advisory: openclaw voice-call before 2026.8.1 Authorization BypassThird-party advisory, euvd
- github.comGitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-4wvr-f35r-f8w4)Vendor advisory, euvd
- vulncheck.comVulnCheck Advisory: OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Authentication Bypass via Spoofed RequesterThird-party advisory, euvd
- github.comGitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-fphf-69cp-h5xw)Vendor advisory, euvd
- vulncheck.comVulnCheck Advisory: OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Path Traversal via Structured AttachmentsThird-party advisory, euvd
- github.comGitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-9x88-f7rh-4c83)Vendor advisory, euvd
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: none known, automatable: no
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After SSVC assessment added —{"id":"CVE-2026-100560","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-09-30T00:23:44.388854Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
ReceivedVulnCheck
CVSS V4.0: AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness type: CWE-863
Description added or changed
Show 7 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description added —OpenClaw versions before 2026.8.1 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability where Allow Always approvals for exact commands persist as path-only grants on macOS and Linux. Attackers can reuse the same executable with different arguments to execute commands without triggering new approval prompts, potentially accessing files or internal services.CVSS added —AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XCVSS added —AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HWeakness type (CWE) added —CWE-863Affected versions (publisher) added —New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/100xxx/CVE-2026-100560.json">CVE-2026-100560</a>Reference added —https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-74gc-hg2m-79p9Reference added —https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-before-2026.8.1-reusable-exec-approvals-authorization-bypassSource identifier: disclosure@vulncheck.com
Linked CVEs
| High | CVE-2026-95815 | OpenClaw iOS before 2026.8.11 Credential Exposure via Deep-Link URL Logging | 6.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100599 | OpenClaw 2026.5.1 before 2026.7.1 Remote Code Execution via googlemeet.chrome | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100598 | OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Approval Binding Logic Error | 7.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100597 | OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Path Traversal via Filesystem Race | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100596 | OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Authorization Bypass via MCP Configuration | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100595 | OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Authorization Bypass via diagnostics | 6.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100594 | OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Authorization Bypass via trajectory export | 6.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100593 | OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Authentication Bypass via activation | 5.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100592 | OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Authentication Bypass via Memory Dreaming | 6.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100591 | OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Authentication Bypass via Active Memory | 6.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100590 | OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Authorization Bypass via voice set | 4.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100589 | OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Sandbox Bypass via Browser Node | 8.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100588 | OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Authentication Bypass via node.invoke | 8.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100587 | OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Authorization Bypass via Codex Install | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100586 | OpenClaw Codex before 2026.7.1 Authorization Bypass via Bind | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100585 | OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Authentication Bypass via MCP Channel | 8.0 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100584 | OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Allowlist Bypass via Workspace Shadows | 6.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100583 | OpenClaw Discord before 2026.7.1 Authorization Bypass | 4.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100582 | OpenClaw Channel Plugins before 2026.8.1 Channel Read Allowlist Bypass | 6.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100581 | OpenClaw iOS before 2026.8.11 Credential Storage via Share Extension | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100580 | OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Remote Code Execution via cron tool | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100579 | OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Authentication Bypass via Spoofed Requester | 7.6 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100578 | OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Authorization Bypass via chat.send | 7.6 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100577 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Server-Side Request Forgery via Video Asset | 6.3 | — |
Show 51 more CVEs
| Medium | CVE-2026-100576 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 SSRF via Browser Wait Predicates | 5.4 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100575 | OpenClaw Slack before 2026.8.1 Authentication Bypass via Group DM | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100574 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 SSRF via Trusted-Host DNS | 5.9 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100573 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Sandbox Policy Bypass via MCP Loopback | 3.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100572 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Denial of Service via Rate Limit | 5.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100571 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 SMS Webhook Rate Limit Bypass | 5.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100570 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Remote Code Execution via CLOUDSDK_PYTHON_ARGS | 7.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100569 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Credential Exposure via Endpoint Override | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100568 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Unauthorized Command Job Access | 8.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100567 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 DNS Rebinding via CDP Hostname | 8.2 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100566 | OpenClaw LINE before 2026.8.1 Access Control Inheritance | 6.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100564 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 CSV Formula Injection via Attendance Export | 5.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100563 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 CSV Formula Injection via Session Labels | 5.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100562 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Authorization Bypass via sessions.create | 5.4 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100561 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Authentication Bypass via Exec Wrapper | 8.0 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100560 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Reusable Exec Approvals Authorization Bypass | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100559 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Command Injection via Escaped Newlines | 8.0 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100558 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Resource Exhaustion via WebSocket Upgrade | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100557 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Authorization Bypass via Skill Tool Dispatch | 8.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100556 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Authentication Bypass via Session Reset | 6.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100555 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 DNS Rebinding via attachment delivery | 7.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100554 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Canvas Capability Revocation Bypass | 4.2 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100553 | OpenClaw 2026.6.9 before 2026.8.1 Cross-Context Policy Bypass via Feishu unpin | 4.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100552 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Policy Bypass via Native Tools | 8.8 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-100551 | OpenClaw iOS Control UI TLS Pin Enforcement Bypass | 8.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100550 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Authentication Bypass via Access Group | 5.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100549 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Path Traversal via QQBot voice filenames | 5.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100548 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Credential Exposure via Embedding Fallback | 5.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100547 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Authentication Bypass via File URL | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100546 | OpenClaw 2026.7.2 before 2026.9.2 Authentication Bypass via Voice Transcript | 6.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100545 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Policy Bypass via Session Filename Generation | 5.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100544 | openclaw voice-call before 2026.8.1 Authorization Bypass | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100543 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Information Disclosure via Configuration Hash | 7.5 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-100542 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Extraction Limit Bypass via tar.bz2 | 3.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100541 | OpenClaw Matrix before 2026.8.1 Authorization Bypass via Case Folding | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100540 | OpenClaw Feishu before 2026.8.1 Authentication Bypass via Disabled Account | 6.8 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-100539 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Memory Access Control Bypass | 2.6 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100538 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Local File Read via Outbound Attachments | 6.5 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-100537 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Authentication Bypass via Active Memory | 3.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100536 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Path Traversal via Structured Attachments | 6.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100535 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Privilege Escalation via Session Memory | 7.5 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-100534 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Session Cancellation Authorization Bypass | 3.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100533 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Path Traversal via Unicode Fallback | 5.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100532 | openclaw WhatsApp before 2026.8.1 Authentication Bypass | 8.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100531 | openclaw Slack before 2026.8.1 Authorization Bypass | 6.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100530 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Exec Approval Directory Binding | 7.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-100529 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Authorization Scope Widening via File-Transfer | 6.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100528 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 Credential Disclosure via Provider Endpoint | 5.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100527 | OpenClaw before 2026.8.2 Denial of Service via Browser Relay | 5.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100526 | Vulnerability in discord | 5.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-100525 | OpenClaw diagnostics-prometheus before 2026.9.3 Authentication Bypass | 4.3 | — |
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-100560"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-100560.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-100560 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>