libxml2: Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CVE-2026-63090)
Published Sources: BSI
What is affected, what to do
ProFTPD before 1.3.9c and 1.3.10rc3 contains a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the mod_sftp module that allows authenticated low-privilege attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution by sending crafted SFTP packet fragments exceeding the 16 KB reassembly buffer in the fxp.c component. Attackers can supply oversized fragments to trigger an incorrectly conditioned reallocation, corrupt pool freelist metadata, overwrite the root_fs BSS global pointer to reference a fake filesystem struct, and redirect pr_fsio_stat() to system() via a crafted RENAME request.
Update ProFTPD to version 1.3.9c, ProFTPD to version 1.3.10rc3.
- Affected
- ProFTPD
lt *..1.3.9c - ProFTPD
lt 1.3.10rc1..1.3.10rc3
- ProFTPD
- Fixed in
- ProFTPD
1.3.9c - ProFTPD
1.3.10rc3
- ProFTPD
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
8.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
8.8
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: BSI
0.9 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 60.5
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 63.36 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 8.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 8.8
CVSS v4
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 8.7
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.9 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 60.5
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: none known · not automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 21 July 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-122
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
ProFTPD before 1.3.9c and 1.3.10rc3 contains a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the mod_sftp module that allows authenticated low-privilege attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution by sending crafted SFTP packet fragments exceeding the 16 KB reassembly buffer in the fxp.c component. Attackers can supply oversized fragments to trigger an incorrectly conditioned reallocation, corrupt pool freelist metadata, overwrite the root_fs BSS global pointer to reference a fake filesystem struct, and redirect pr_fsio_stat() to system() via a crafted RENAME request.
Source: BSI WID Portal
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| GNOME | libxml2 |
|
|
| ISC | BIND 9 |
|
|
| NLnet Labs | Unbound |
|
|
| OpenBSD | OpenSSH |
|
|
| proftpd | proftpd |
|
|
| ProFTPD Project | ProFTPD |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Hardened Images |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat JBoss Core Services |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 |
|
|
| Sudo project | Sudo |
|
|
| The GNU C Library | glibc |
|
|
| xmlsoft | libxml2 |
|
|
| gnu | glibc |
|
|
From bundled advisories, not CVE-specific (24)
Product list of a bundled advisory that does not state which product this CVE affects.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| cPanel | cPanel/WHM |
|
|
| IBM | AIX |
|
|
| IBM | VIOS |
|
|
| NetApp | ActiveIQ Unified Manager |
|
|
| Open Source | GNU libc |
|
|
| Open Source | Unbound |
|
|
| Oracle | GraalVM |
|
|
| Oracle | Java SE |
|
|
| Oracle | JavaFX |
|
|
| Red Hat | Enterprise Linux |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Linux | debian | bind9 | bookworm |
| Linux | debian | bind9 | bullseye |
| Linux | debian | bind9 | trixie |
| Linux | ubuntu | bind9 | bionic |
| Linux | ubuntu | bind9 | focal |
| Linux | ubuntu | bind9 | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | bind9 | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | bind9 | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | bind9 | trusty |
| Linux | ubuntu | bind9 | xenial |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux | 10.0 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux | 8.0 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux | 7.0 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux | 6.0 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux | 9.0 |
| Linux | debian | glibc | bullseye |
| Linux | ubuntu | openssh | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | openssh | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | openssh | resolute |
| Linux | debian | sudo | bullseye |
| Linux | debian | unbound | trixie |
| Linux | ubuntu | unbound | bionic |
| Linux | ubuntu | unbound | focal |
| Linux | ubuntu | unbound | jammy |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-122Heap-based Buffer Overflow
Variant
A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().
Entry at MITRE CWE-122
References & sources
- nlnetlabs.nldownloads/unbound/CVE-2026-56444.txtVendor advisory, Vendor advisory
- nlnetlabs.nldownloads/unbound/CVE-2026-50243.txtVendor advisory, Vendor advisory
- nlnetlabs.nldownloads/unbound/CVE-2026-40691.txtVendor advisory, Vendor advisory
- nlnetlabs.nldownloads/unbound/CVE-2026-50252.txtVendor advisory, Vendor advisory
- kb.isc.orgCVE-2026-11721Vendor advisory
- downloads.isc.orgisc/bind9/9.20.26Patch
- downloads.isc.orgisc/bind9/9.21.24Patch
- nlnetlabs.nldownloads/unbound/CVE-2026-55991.txtVendor advisory, Vendor advisory
- nlnetlabs.nldownloads/unbound/CVE-2026-40622.txteuvd, Vendor advisory
- sourceware.orgbugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34015
- Siemens ProductCERTproductcert/html/ssa-082556.html
- nlnetlabs.nldownloads/unbound/CVE-2026-50046.txtVendor advisory, Vendor advisory
- kb.isc.orgCVE-2026-10723Vendor advisory
- kb.isc.orgCVE-2026-13321Vendor advisory
- nlnetlabs.nldownloads/unbound/CVE-2026-55973.txtVendor advisory, Vendor advisory
- openwall.comlists/oss-security/2026/07/06/5Mailing list, Release notes
- marc.info?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=178333966933090&w=2Release notes
- openssh.orgreleasenotes.htmlRelease notes
- kb.isc.orgCVE-2026-11331Vendor advisory
- sourceware.orgbugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34014
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: none known, automatable: no
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After SSVC assessment added —{"id":"CVE-2026-63090","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-07-21T15:33:06.549976Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Linked CVEs
| High | CVE-2026-6732 | Libxml2: libxml2: denial of service via crafted xsd-validated document | 7.5 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-6653 | libxml2: Use after free in xmlParseInternalSubset via improper entity resolution handling | 9.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-63091 | ProFTPD mod_sftp Signed Integer Overflow via SCP Size-Record Parser | 6.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-63090 | ProFTPD mod_sftp Heap Buffer Overflow via SFTP Packet Reassembly | 8.8 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-60002 | OpenBSD OpenSSH: Use After Free | 9.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-60001 | OpenBSD OpenSSH: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling | 6.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-60000 | OpenBSD OpenSSH: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-59999 | OpenBSD OpenSSH: Use of Less Trusted Source | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-59998 | OpenBSD OpenSSH: Improper Following of Specification by Caller | 6.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-59997 | OpenBSD OpenSSH: Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input | 5.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-59996 | OpenBSD OpenSSH: Relative Path Traversal | 5.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-59995 | OpenBSD OpenSSH: Relative Path Traversal | 5.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-56444 | NLnet Labs Unbound: Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime | 5.9 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-56416 | Possible heap buffer overflow when validator canonicalizes RDATA that contains domain name | 4.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-55991 | Remote DNS-over-QUIC (DoQ) flow-control assertion failure in libngtcp2 | 5.9 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-55990 | Packet of death for a DNSCrypt misconfigured Unbound | 5.9 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-55973 | 'dns-error-reporting: yes' leads to stack buffer overflow | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-55717 | 'serve-expired-client-timeout' and 'response-ip' CNAME redirect could lead to a crash | 5.9 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-55708 | Privacy/configuration issue when adding local data in views through 'unbound-control' | 3.1 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-54478 | DNS Cookie bypass when combined with proxy-protocol use | 3.7 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-53994 | ProFTPD mod_sftp Heap Buffer Overflow via Unsigned Integer Underflow and Size Truncation | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-52863 | Memory corruption could lead to crash and denial of service | 5.9 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-50252 | Possible cache poisoning attack by mapping source port population per thread | 9.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-50251 | Attacker supplied '0.0.0.0'/'::' glue triggers defensive full-cache flush | 5.3 | — |
Show 32 more CVEs
| Medium | CVE-2026-50248 | BOGUS configured primary hostname accepted for XFR in auth/rpz zones | 6.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-50243 | 'response-ip'/'rpz' can rewrite BOGUS answers instead of returning SERVFAIL | 3.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-50046 | Possible heap use-after-free in an error path when a DoT forwarded query is jostled out | 5.9 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-50045 | 'max-global-quota' reset by DNSSEC validation restarts | 5.3 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-46582 | A wildcard replay, as another piece of data, triggers poisoning in the serve expired reply path | 3.7 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-44690 | Cross-zone wildcard cache poisoning via RRSIG.labels manipulation | 7.5 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-44687 | NLnet Labs Unbound: Off-by-one Error | 3.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-44621 | NLnet Labs Unbound: Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions | 5.9 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-4438 | gethostbyaddr and gethostbyaddr_r return invalid DNS hostnames | 5.9 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-4437 | gethostbyaddr and gethostbyaddr_r may incorrectly handle DNS response | 7.5 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-42955 | NLnet Labs Unbound: Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release | 3.7 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-41637 | Degradation of resolution service from improperly accounted client-terminated DNS-over-QUIC queries | 3.7 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-40691 | Packet of death for DNSCrypt over TCP | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-40622 | Another 'ghost domain names' attack variant | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-4046 | iconv crash due to assertion failure with untrusted input | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-35535 | Sudo: Privilege Dropping / Lowering Errors | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-35025 | ProFTPD ACL Bypass via /proc/self/root Path Prefix in RNFR | 8.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-32665 | Remote DNS-over-QUIC denial of service due to `quic-size` budget bypass | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-14586 | Assertion in libngtcp2 when under pressure in high concurrency DNS-over-QUIC environments | 5.9 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-13321 | DNSSEC Validation Bypass via Out-of-Zone NSEC Next Field | 8.6 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-13204 | Unexpected exit in certain situations with NSEC and NSEC3 both present | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-12617 | Record ordering based unexpected exit with CNAME or DNAME | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-11979 | Stack-Based Buffer Overflow in libxml2 | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-11721 | Cache poisoning possible with label count discrepancy, RRSIG, and wildcards | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-11622 | Potential memory usage beyond configured limits | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-11605 | Unnecessary validation of DNSSEC signed records | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-11331 | Potential wildcard CNAME RPZ policy bypass | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-10822 | Key Record using PRIVATEDNS algorithm may lead to unexpected exit | 6.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-10723 | Incorrect acceptance of NSEC3 records | 6.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-0915 | getnetbyaddr and getnetbyaddr_r leak stack contents to DNS resovler | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-0861 | Integer overflow in memalign leads to heap corruption | 8.4 | — |
| High | CVE-2025-15281 | wordexp with WRDE_REUSE and WRDE_APPEND may return uninitialized memory | 7.5 | — |
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-63090"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-63090.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-63090 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>