HighCVE-2026-63090

    libxml2: Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CVE-2026-63090)

    Published Sources: BSI

    What is affected, what to do

    ProFTPD before 1.3.9c and 1.3.10rc3 contains a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the mod_sftp module that allows authenticated low-privilege attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution by sending crafted SFTP packet fragments exceeding the 16 KB reassembly buffer in the fxp.c component. Attackers can supply oversized fragments to trigger an incorrectly conditioned reallocation, corrupt pool freelist metadata, overwrite the root_fs BSS global pointer to reference a fake filesystem struct, and redirect pr_fsio_stat() to system() via a crafted RENAME request.

    Update ProFTPD to version 1.3.9c, ProFTPD to version 1.3.10rc3.

    Affected
    • ProFTPD lt *..1.3.9c
    • ProFTPD lt 1.3.10rc1..1.3.10rc3
    Fixed in
    • ProFTPD 1.3.9c
    • ProFTPD 1.3.10rc3

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    8.8

    Priority

    XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    8.8

    CVSS v3

    Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: BSI

    0.9 %

    EPSS score

    Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 60.5

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    High
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    63.36 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    no public PoC known
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    8.8 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    8.8
    CVSS v4

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    8.7
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    0.9 %
    Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    60.5
    High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    —
    Published
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: none known · not automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 21 July 2026
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-122

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    ProFTPD before 1.3.9c and 1.3.10rc3 contains a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the mod_sftp module that allows authenticated low-privilege attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution by sending crafted SFTP packet fragments exceeding the 16 KB reassembly buffer in the fxp.c component. Attackers can supply oversized fragments to trigger an incorrectly conditioned reallocation, corrupt pool freelist metadata, overwrite the root_fs BSS global pointer to reference a fake filesystem struct, and redirect pr_fsio_stat() to system() via a crafted RENAME request.

    Source: BSI WID Portal

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    GNOMElibxml2
    • 2.9.11 – < 2.11.0
    • 2.11.0
    ISCBIND 9
    • 9.11.0 – ≤ 9.18.50
    • 9.11.3-S1 – ≤ 9.18.50-S1
    • 9.16.0 – ≤ 9.18.50
    • 9.16.8-S1 – ≤ 9.18.50-S1
    • 9.18.0 – ≤ 9.18.50
    • 9.18.11-S1 – ≤ 9.18.50-S1
    • 9.20.0 – ≤ 9.20.24
    • 9.20.9-S1 – ≤ 9.20.24-S1
    • 9.21.0 – ≤ 9.21.23
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    NLnet LabsUnbound
    • 1.10.0 – < 1.25.2
    • 1.13.2 – < 1.25.2
    • 1.15.0 – < 1.25.2
    • 1.16.2 – < 1.25.1
    • 1.16.2 – < 1.25.2
    • 1.18.0 – < 1.25.2
    • 1.20.0 – < 1.25.2
    • 1.22.0 – < 1.25.2
    • 1.23.0 – < 1.25.2
    • 1.25.0 – < 1.25.2
    • 1.4.22 – < 1.25.2
    • 1.6.0 – < 1.25.2
    • 1.6.2 – < 1.25.2
    • 1.7.0 – < 1.25.2
    • 1.9.0 – < 1.25.2
    • < 1.25.2
    • 1.25.2
    • 1.25.2
    • 1.25.2
    • 1.25.1
    • 1.25.2
    • 1.25.2
    • 1.25.2
    • 1.25.2
    • 1.25.2
    • 1.25.2
    • 1.25.2
    • 1.25.2
    • 1.25.2
    • 1.25.2
    • 1.25.2
    • 1.25.2
    OpenBSDOpenSSH
    • < 10.4
    • 10.4
    proftpdproftpd
    • 1.3.10rc1 – < 1.3.10rc3
    • < 1.3.9c
    • 1.3.10rc3
    • 1.3.9c
    ProFTPD ProjectProFTPD
    • ≤ 1.3.10rc2
    • ≤ 1.3.9b
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10
    • —
    • —
    Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6
    • —
    • —
    Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7
    • —
    • —
    Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8
    • —
    • —
    Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9
    • —
    • —
    Red HatRed Hat Hardened Images
    • < 2.15.3-0.1.hum1
    • 2.15.3-0.1.hum1
    Red HatRed Hat JBoss Core Services
    • —
    • —
    Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
    • —
    • —
    Sudo projectSudo
    • —
    • —
    The GNU C Libraryglibc
    • 2.0 – ≤ 2.42
    • 2.30 – ≤ 2.42
    • 2.3.3 – ≤ 2.43
    • 2.34 – ≤ 2.43
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    xmlsoftlibxml2
    • ≤ 2.15.3
    • —
    gnuglibc
    • 2.0 – ≤ 2.42
    • 2.0 – < 2.43
    • —
    • 2.43
    From bundled advisories, not CVE-specific (24)

    Product list of a bundled advisory that does not state which product this CVE affects.

    Products from bundled advisories
    Affected versionsFixed in
    cPanelcPanel/WHM
    • 126.0.63
    • < 134.0.30
    • < 136.0.14
    • —
    • 134.0.30
    • 136.0.14
    IBMAIX
    • 7.2
    • 7.3
    • —
    • —
    IBMVIOS
    • 4.1
    • —
    NetAppActiveIQ Unified Manager
    • for VMware vSphere
    • —
    Open SourceGNU libc
    • 2.34-2.43
    • —
    Open SourceUnbound
    • < 1.25.1
    • 1.25.1
    OracleGraalVM
    • 17.0.20.1
    • 21.0.12.1
    • 21.3.19.1.1
    • —
    • —
    • —
    OracleJava SE
    • 11.0.32.1
    • 17.0.20.1
    • 21.0.12.1
    • 25.0.4.1
    • 26.0.2
    • 27
    • 8u503
    • 8u503-perf
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    OracleJavaFX
    • 21.0.12
    • 25.0.4
    • 27
    • —
    • —
    • —
    Red HatEnterprise Linux
    • 8
    • —

    Vendors and products

    Affected operating systems

    Affected operating systems
    Linuxdebianbind9bookworm
    Linuxdebianbind9bullseye
    Linuxdebianbind9trixie
    Linuxubuntubind9bionic
    Linuxubuntubind9focal
    Linuxubuntubind9jammy
    Linuxubuntubind9noble
    Linuxubuntubind9resolute
    Linuxubuntubind9trusty
    Linuxubuntubind9xenial
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux10.0
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux8.0
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux7.0
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux6.0
    Linuxredhatenterprise_linux9.0
    Linuxdebianglibcbullseye
    Linuxubuntuopensshjammy
    Linuxubuntuopensshnoble
    Linuxubuntuopensshresolute
    Linuxdebiansudobullseye
    Linuxdebianunboundtrixie
    Linuxubuntuunboundbionic
    Linuxubuntuunboundfocal
    Linuxubuntuunboundjammy

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-122Heap-based Buffer Overflow

      Variant

      A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().

      Entry at MITRE CWE-122

    References & sources

    Changes to this CVE

    Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).

    1. Record modifiedCISA ADP

      CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: none known, automatable: no

      Show the original change
      Individual changes of this event as published by NVD
      TypeActionBeforeAfter
      SSVC assessmentadded
      —
      {"id":"CVE-2026-63090","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-07-21T15:33:06.549976Z"}

      Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

    Linked CVEs

    Linked CVEs
    HighCVE-2026-6732Libxml2: libxml2: denial of service via crafted xsd-validated document7.5—
    CriticalCVE-2026-6653libxml2: Use after free in xmlParseInternalSubset via improper entity resolution handling9.8—
    HighCVE-2026-63091ProFTPD mod_sftp Signed Integer Overflow via SCP Size-Record Parser6.5—
    HighCVE-2026-63090ProFTPD mod_sftp Heap Buffer Overflow via SFTP Packet Reassembly8.8—
    CriticalCVE-2026-60002OpenBSD OpenSSH: Use After Free9.4—
    MediumCVE-2026-60001OpenBSD OpenSSH: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling6.5—
    HighCVE-2026-60000OpenBSD OpenSSH: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling7.5—
    HighCVE-2026-59999OpenBSD OpenSSH: Use of Less Trusted Source7.5—
    MediumCVE-2026-59998OpenBSD OpenSSH: Improper Following of Specification by Caller6.5—
    MediumCVE-2026-59997OpenBSD OpenSSH: Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input5.4—
    MediumCVE-2026-59996OpenBSD OpenSSH: Relative Path Traversal5.4—
    MediumCVE-2026-59995OpenBSD OpenSSH: Relative Path Traversal5.4—
    MediumCVE-2026-56444NLnet Labs Unbound: Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime5.9—
    MediumCVE-2026-56416Possible heap buffer overflow when validator canonicalizes RDATA that contains domain name4.8—
    MediumCVE-2026-55991Remote DNS-over-QUIC (DoQ) flow-control assertion failure in libngtcp25.9—
    MediumCVE-2026-55990Packet of death for a DNSCrypt misconfigured Unbound5.9—
    HighCVE-2026-55973'dns-error-reporting: yes' leads to stack buffer overflow7.5—
    MediumCVE-2026-55717'serve-expired-client-timeout' and 'response-ip' CNAME redirect could lead to a crash5.9—
    LowCVE-2026-55708Privacy/configuration issue when adding local data in views through 'unbound-control'3.1—
    LowCVE-2026-54478DNS Cookie bypass when combined with proxy-protocol use3.7—
    HighCVE-2026-53994ProFTPD mod_sftp Heap Buffer Overflow via Unsigned Integer Underflow and Size Truncation7.5—
    MediumCVE-2026-52863Memory corruption could lead to crash and denial of service5.9—
    CriticalCVE-2026-50252Possible cache poisoning attack by mapping source port population per thread9.3—
    MediumCVE-2026-50251Attacker supplied '0.0.0.0'/'::' glue triggers defensive full-cache flush5.3—
    Show 32 more CVEs
    Linked CVEs
    MediumCVE-2026-50248BOGUS configured primary hostname accepted for XFR in auth/rpz zones6.5—
    MediumCVE-2026-50243'response-ip'/'rpz' can rewrite BOGUS answers instead of returning SERVFAIL3.7—
    MediumCVE-2026-50046Possible heap use-after-free in an error path when a DoT forwarded query is jostled out5.9—
    MediumCVE-2026-50045'max-global-quota' reset by DNSSEC validation restarts5.3—
    LowCVE-2026-46582A wildcard replay, as another piece of data, triggers poisoning in the serve expired reply path3.7—
    HighCVE-2026-44690Cross-zone wildcard cache poisoning via RRSIG.labels manipulation7.5—
    LowCVE-2026-44687NLnet Labs Unbound: Off-by-one Error3.7—
    MediumCVE-2026-44621NLnet Labs Unbound: Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions5.9—
    MediumCVE-2026-4438gethostbyaddr and gethostbyaddr_r return invalid DNS hostnames5.9—
    HighCVE-2026-4437gethostbyaddr and gethostbyaddr_r may incorrectly handle DNS response7.5—
    LowCVE-2026-42955NLnet Labs Unbound: Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release3.7—
    LowCVE-2026-41637Degradation of resolution service from improperly accounted client-terminated DNS-over-QUIC queries3.7—
    HighCVE-2026-40691Packet of death for DNSCrypt over TCP7.5—
    HighCVE-2026-40622Another 'ghost domain names' attack variant7.5—
    HighCVE-2026-4046iconv crash due to assertion failure with untrusted input7.5—
    HighCVE-2026-35535Sudo: Privilege Dropping / Lowering Errors7.8—
    HighCVE-2026-35025ProFTPD ACL Bypass via /proc/self/root Path Prefix in RNFR8.1—
    HighCVE-2026-32665Remote DNS-over-QUIC denial of service due to `quic-size` budget bypass7.5—
    MediumCVE-2026-14586Assertion in libngtcp2 when under pressure in high concurrency DNS-over-QUIC environments5.9—
    HighCVE-2026-13321DNSSEC Validation Bypass via Out-of-Zone NSEC Next Field8.6—
    HighCVE-2026-13204Unexpected exit in certain situations with NSEC and NSEC3 both present7.5—
    HighCVE-2026-12617Record ordering based unexpected exit with CNAME or DNAME7.5—
    HighCVE-2026-11979Stack-Based Buffer Overflow in libxml27.8—
    HighCVE-2026-11721Cache poisoning possible with label count discrepancy, RRSIG, and wildcards7.5—
    HighCVE-2026-11622Potential memory usage beyond configured limits7.5—
    HighCVE-2026-11605Unnecessary validation of DNSSEC signed records7.5—
    HighCVE-2026-11331Potential wildcard CNAME RPZ policy bypass7.5—
    MediumCVE-2026-10822Key Record using PRIVATEDNS algorithm may lead to unexpected exit6.5—
    MediumCVE-2026-10723Incorrect acceptance of NSEC3 records6.8—
    HighCVE-2026-0915getnetbyaddr and getnetbyaddr_r leak stack contents to DNS resovler7.5—
    HighCVE-2026-0861Integer overflow in memalign leads to heap corruption8.4—
    HighCVE-2025-15281wordexp with WRDE_REUSE and WRDE_APPEND may return uninitialized memory7.5—
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2026-63090
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-63090"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-63090.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-63090 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>