Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen
Published Sources: BSI
What is affected, what to do
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Don't leave consecutive consumed OOB skbs. Jann Horn reported a use-after-free in unix_stream_read_generic().
Update Linux Kernel to version 5.15.194, Linux Kernel to version 6.1.143, Linux Kernel to version 6.6.96.
- Affected
- Linux Kernel
lt 5.15..5.15.194 - Linux Kernel
lt 5.16..6.1.143 - Linux Kernel
lt 6.2..6.6.96 - Linux Kernel
lt 6.7..6.12.36 - Linux Kernel
lt 6.13..6.15.5
- Linux Kernel
- Fixed in
- Linux Kernel
5.15.194 - Linux Kernel
6.1.143 - Linux Kernel
6.6.96 - Linux Kernel
6.12.36 - Linux Kernel
6.15.5 - Linux Kernel
6.16
- Linux Kernel
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.8
XIEM Effective CVSS
Highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
7.8
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: BSI
0.3 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 23.3
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 51.43 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.3 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 23.3
- Elevated — this CVE ranks above at least 10% of all CVEs scored today.
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Don't leave consecutive consumed OOB skbs. Jann Horn reported a use-after-free in unix_stream_read_generic(). The following sequences reproduce the issue: $ python3 from socket import * s1, s2 = socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM) s1.send(b'x', MSG_OOB) s2.recv(1, MSG_OOB) # leave a consumed OOB skb s1.send(b'y', MSG_OOB) s2.recv(1, MSG_OOB) # leave a consumed OOB skb s1.send(b'z', MSG_OOB) s2.recv(1) # recv 'z' illegally s2.recv(1, MSG_OOB) # access 'z' skb (use-after-free) Even though a user reads OOB data, the skb holding the data stays on the recv queue to mark the OOB boundary and break the next recv(). After the last send() in the scenario above, the sk2's recv queue has 2 leading consumed OOB skbs and 1 real OOB skb. Then, the following happens during the next recv() without MSG_OOB 1. unix_stream_read_generic() peeks the first consumed OOB skb 2. manage_oob() returns the next consumed OOB skb 3. unix_stream_read_generic() fetches the next not-yet-consumed OOB skb 4. unix_stream_read_generic() reads and frees the OOB skb , and the last recv(MSG_OOB) triggers KASAN splat. The 3. above occurs because of the SO_PEEK_OFF code, which does not expect unix_skb_len(skb) to be 0, but this is true for such consumed OOB skbs. while (skip >= unix_skb_len(skb)) { skip -= unix_skb_len(skb); skb = skb_peek_next(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue); ... } In addition to this use-after-free, there is another issue that ioctl(SIOCATMARK) does not function properly with consecutive consumed OOB skbs. So, nothing good comes out of such a situation. Instead of complicating manage_oob(), ioctl() handling, and the next ECONNRESET fix by introducing a loop for consecutive consumed OOB skbs, let's not leave such consecutive OOB unnecessarily. Now, while receiving an OOB skb in unix_stream_recv_urg(), if its previous skb is a consumed OOB skb, it is freed. [0]: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in unix_stream_read_actor (net/unix/af_unix.c:3027) Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106ef2904 by task python3/315 CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 315 Comm: python3 Not tainted 6.16.0-rc1-00407-gec315832f6f9 #8 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-4.fc42 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:122) print_report (mm/kasan/report.c:409 mm/kasan/report.c:521) kasan_report (mm/kasan/report.c:636) unix_stream_read_actor (net/unix/af_unix.c:3027) unix_stream_read_generic (net/unix/af_unix.c:2708 net/unix/af_unix.c:2847) unix_stream_recvmsg (net/unix/af_unix.c:3048) sock_recvmsg (net/socket.c:1063 (discriminator 20) net/socket.c:1085 (discriminator 20)) __sys_recvfrom (net/socket.c:2278) __x64_sys_recvfrom (net/socket.c:2291 (discriminator 1) net/socket.c:2287 (discriminator 1) net/socket.c:2287 (discriminator 1)) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 (discriminator 1) arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 (discriminator 1)) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130) RIP: 0033:0x7f8911fcea06 Code: 5d e8 41 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 75 19 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 11 e8 26 ff ff ff 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 45 10 0f 05 <48> 8b 5d f8 c9 c3 0f 1f 40 00 f3 0f 1e fa 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 08 RSP: 002b:00007fffdb0dccb0 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002d RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fffdb0dcdc8 RCX: 00007f8911fcea06 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00007f8911a5e060 RDI: 0000000000000006 RBP: 00007fffdb0dccd0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007f89119a7d20 R13: ffffffffc4653600 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Allocated by task 315: kasan_save_stack (mm/kasan/common.c:48) kasan_save_track (mm/kasan/common.c:60 (discriminator 1) mm/kasan/common.c:69 (discriminator 1)) __kasan_slab_alloc (mm/kasan/common.c:348) kmem_cache_alloc_ ---truncated---
Source: BSI WID Portal
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
|
|
| Android 13 |
|
| |
| Android 14 |
|
| |
| Android 15 |
|
| |
| Android 16 |
|
| |
| Open Source | Linux Kernel |
|
|
| android | :linux_kernel: |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Linux | debian | debian_linux | 11.0 |
| Linux | debian | linux | bookworm |
| Linux | debian | linux | bullseye |
| Linux | debian | linux | trixie |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux | noble |
| Linux | debian | linux-6.1 | bullseye |
| Linux | debian | linux-6.12 | bookworm |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws-6.8 | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws-fips | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-6.8 | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fde | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fde-6.8 | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fips | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp-6.8 | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp-fips | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gke | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gkeop | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-hwe-6.8 | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-ibm | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-ibm-6.8 | jammy |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-lowlatency | noble |
References & sources
- lore.kernel.orgKernel CVE Announce MailinglisteBSI
- lore.kernel.orgLinux Kernel CVE Announcement CVE-2025-38236BSI
- lore.kernel.orgLinux Kernel CVE Announcement CVE-2025-38237BSI
- project-zero.issues.chromium.orgPoC CVE-2025-38236BSI
- lists.debian.orgDebian Security Advisory DSA-5973 vom 2025-08-12BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2025:02853-1 vom 2025-08-18BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2025:02923-1 vom 2025-08-20BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2025:02969-1 vom 2025-08-25BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2025:02997-1 vom 2025-08-27BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2025:02996-1 vom 2025-08-27BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2025:20577-1 vom 2025-08-28BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2025:20586-1 vom 2025-08-28BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2025:03011-1 vom 2025-08-28BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2025:20602-1 vom 2025-08-29BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2025:20601-1 vom 2025-08-29BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2025:03023-1 vom 2025-08-29BSI
- alas.aws.amazon.comAmazon Linux Security Advisory ALAS2KERNEL-5.15-2025-088 vom 2025-09-04BSI
- linux.oracle.comOracle Linux Security Advisory ELSA-2025-20551 vom 2025-09-09BSI
- linux.oracle.comOracle Linux Security Advisory ELSA-2025-20552 vom 2025-09-09BSI
- linux.oracle.comOracle Linux Security Advisory ELSA-2025-20553 vom 2025-09-10BSI
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedLinux
CVSS V3.1: AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After CVSS added —AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSource identifier: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
Linked CVEs
| Medium | CVE-2025-38237 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2025-38236 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2025-38236"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2025-38236.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2025-38236 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>