Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen
Published Sources: BSI
What is affected, what to do
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix handling of cached open files in nfsd4_open codepath Commit fb70bf124b05 ("NFSD: Instantiate a struct file when creating a regular NFSv4 file") added the ability to cache an open fd over a compound. There are a couple of problems with the way this currently works: It's racy, as a newly-created nfsd_file can end up with its PENDING bit cleared while the nf is hashed, and the nf_file pointer is still zeroed out.
Update Linux Kernel to version 6.1.7, Linux Kernel to version 6.2.
- Affected
- Linux Kernel
lt 5.19..6.1.7
- Linux Kernel
- Fixed in
- Linux Kernel
6.1.7 - Linux Kernel
6.2
- Linux Kernel
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.5
XIEM Effective CVSS
Highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
7.5
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: BSI
0.6 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 51.3
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 54.53 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.6 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 51.3
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: none known · not automatable · Technical impact: partial
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 10 September 2024
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix handling of cached open files in nfsd4_open codepath Commit fb70bf124b05 ("NFSD: Instantiate a struct file when creating a regular NFSv4 file") added the ability to cache an open fd over a compound. There are a couple of problems with the way this currently works: It's racy, as a newly-created nfsd_file can end up with its PENDING bit cleared while the nf is hashed, and the nf_file pointer is still zeroed out. Other tasks can find it in this state and they expect to see a valid nf_file, and can oops if nf_file is NULL. Also, there is no guarantee that we'll end up creating a new nfsd_file if one is already in the hash. If an extant entry is in the hash with a valid nf_file, nfs4_get_vfs_file will clobber its nf_file pointer with the value of op_file and the old nf_file will leak. Fix both issues by making a new nfsd_file_acquirei_opened variant that takes an optional file pointer. If one is present when this is called, we'll take a new reference to it instead of trying to open the file. If the nfsd_file already has a valid nf_file, we'll just ignore the optional file and pass the nfsd_file back as-is. Also rework the tracepoints a bit to allow for an "opened" variant and don't try to avoid counting acquisitions in the case where we already have a cached open file.
Source: BSI WID Portal
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
|
|
From bundled advisories, not CVE-specific (2)
Product list of a bundled advisory that does not state which product this CVE affects.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dell | PowerScale OneFS |
|
|
| IBM | DataPower Gateway |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Linux | debian | linux | bookworm |
| Linux | debian | linux | bullseye |
| Linux | debian | linux-6.1 | bullseye |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-nvidia-tegra | noble |
| Linux | linux | linux_kernel | 6.1.7 |
| Linux | linux | linux_kernel | 6.1 |
| Linux | linux | linux_kernel | 6.2 |
| Linux | linux | linux_kernel | — |
| Linux | linux | linux_kernel | 6.11 |
References & sources
- lists.opensuse.orgSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4228-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.opensuse.orgSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4235-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4231-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4226-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.opensuse.orgSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4237-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4242-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4239-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4241-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4249-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.opensuse.orgSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4240-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.opensuse.orgSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4236-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.opensuse.orgSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4234-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.opensuse.orgSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4230-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4248-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4247-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.opensuse.orgSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4243-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.opensuse.orgSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4256-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.opensuse.orgSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4246-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.suse.comSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4250-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
- lists.opensuse.orgSUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2024:4227-1 vom 2024-12-06BSI
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedLinux
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After CVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HSource identifier: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
Linked CVEs
| High | CVE-2024-43882 | Linux Kernel: Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition | 8.4 | — |
| High | CVE-2024-43881 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2024-43880 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2024-43879 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2024-43878 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 8.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2024-43877 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2024-43876 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2024-43875 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2024-43874 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2024-43873 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2024-43872 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2024-43871 | Linux Kernel: Memory Leak | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2024-43870 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2024-43869 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2024-43868 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2024-43867 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2024-43866 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2024-43865 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2024-43864 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 9.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2024-43863 | Linux Kernel: Deadlock | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2024-43862 | Linux Kernel: Deadlock | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2024-43861 | Linux Kernel: Memory Leak | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2023-52914 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2023-52913 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
Show 53 more CVEs
| Medium | CVE-2023-52912 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2023-52911 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2023-52910 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2023-52909 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2023-52908 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2023-52907 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2023-52906 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2023-52905 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2023-52904 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2023-52903 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2023-52902 | Linux Kernel: Memory Leak | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2023-52901 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2023-52900 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2023-52899 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2023-52898 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 4.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2023-52897 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 4.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2023-52896 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 4.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2023-52895 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2023-52894 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2023-52893 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2022-48899 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48898 | Linux Kernel: Race Condition | 4.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48897 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48896 | Linux Kernel: Memory Leak | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48895 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48894 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48893 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2022-48892 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48891 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48890 | Linux Kernel: Memory Leak | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48889 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48888 | Linux Kernel: Memory Leak | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2022-48887 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48886 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48885 | Linux Kernel: Memory Leak | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48884 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2022-48883 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 7.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48882 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2022-48881 | Linux Kernel: Memory Leak | 7.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48880 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48879 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2022-48878 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| Not rated | CVE-2022-48877 | Vulnerability CVE-2022-48877 | 0.0 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48876 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48875 | Linux Kernel: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2022-48874 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2022-48873 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2022-48872 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2022-48871 | Linux Kernel: Out-of-Bounds Access | 8.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48870 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48869 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 4.7 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2022-48868 | Linux Kernel: NULL Pointer Dereference | 5.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2022-48867 | Linux Kernel: Use-After-Free | 7.8 | — |
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2023-52909"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2023-52909.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2023-52909 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>