CriticalCVE-2020-13927

    Apache Airflow: Missing Authentication for Critical Function (CVE-2020-13927)

    Published In CISA KEV since Sources: BSI

    Share

    What is affected, what to do

    The previous default setting for Airflow's Experimental API was to allow all API requests without authentication, but this poses security risks to users who miss this fact. From Airflow 1.10.11 the default has been changed to deny all requests by default and is documented at https://airflow.apache.org/docs/1.10.11/security.html#api-authentication.

    The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. Update python/cpython to version 3.6.13, Apache Airflow to version 1.10.13, airflow to version 1.10.15. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.

    Affected
    • Apache Airflow eq Apache Airflow <1.10.11..Apache Airflow <1.10.11

    Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability

    Metrics

    9.8

    XIEM Effective CVSS

    Highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.

    Source: NVD, CVSS v3

    9.8

    CVSS v3

    Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.

    Source: BSI

    99.78 %

    EPSS score

    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.

    Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.96

    Show all metrics
    Severity
    Critical
    Priority (0–325)

    The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?

    Read in glossary
    236.43 Methodology
    Exploit maturity

    An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.

    Read in glossary
    actively exploited
    XIEM Effective CVSS

    XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.

    Read in glossary
    9.8 Methodology
    CVSS v3

    CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.

    Read in glossary
    9.8
    EPSS score

    The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.

    Read in glossary
    99.78 %
    High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
    EPSS percentile

    The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.

    Read in glossary
    99.96
    Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
    KEV status

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited
    Published
    In CISA KEV since

    The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.

    Read in glossary
    CISA assessment (SSVC)
    Exploitation: active · automatable · Technical impact: total
    Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 24 July 2024
    CWE

    CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.

    Read in glossary
    CWE-306, CWE-1188, CWE-1056

    Response and mitigation

    Why act now?

    Prioritisation rationale

    This CVE sits on KEV because the Experimental API shipped network-reachable and accepted DAG execution requests with no authentication whatsoever, which effectively amounts to remote code execution as the Airflow service account. The CVSS vector is network / no privileges / no user interaction with full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact, and exploitation likelihood ranks among the very highest in the KEV catalogue with public exploit code available for years. Typical target profiles are data-engineering stacks in cloud environments (self-managed GKE/EKS deployments, MWAA predecessors) accidentally exposed through an ingress or LoadBalancer — patch and disable the API immediately. For internally segmented deployments the risk still ranks P1, because Airflow credentials usually open pivot paths into production databases, cloud IAM and data lakes, even though CISA does not flag ransomware use.

    1. Runbook step 1

      Immediate response (0-24 h)

      • Inventory every Airflow deployment (pip show apache-airflow, container images, Helm releases) and flag versions < 1.10.11; schedule an upgrade to at least 1.10.11, preferably to a currently supported 2.x line.
      • Immediately set [api] auth_backend = airflow.api.auth.backend.deny_all in airflow.cfg (or airflow.api.auth.backend.basic_auth / Kerberos if the API is actively used) and restart scheduler and webserver. Upgrades of existing installs do NOT migrate this setting automatically.
      • Remove the webserver port (default TCP/8080) from the internet: adjust perimeter firewall, security group or ingress rule so only an admin VLAN or VPN can reach it. UI and Experimental API share the same port.
      • Compromise audit: review all DAGs for unknown tasks, newly added BashOperator/PythonOperator entries and altered dag_run objects; treat Connections, Variables and the Fernet key as potentially exposed and rotate them.
      • Rotate service accounts consumed by Airflow (DB users, cloud IAM keys, SSH keys stored in Connections), since an unauthenticated API call can trigger arbitrary DAGs and exfiltrate those credentials.
    2. Runbook step 2

      Mitigation layers

      • Network segmentation: run the Airflow webserver only behind a reverse proxy (nginx, Traefik) fronted by mTLS or an SSO proxy (OAuth2-Proxy, Keycloak Gatekeeper); direct TCP/8080 access limited to a defined management CIDR.
      • WAF / reverse-proxy rule: outright block path /api/experimental/* while the API is not required. If required, allow only POST /api/experimental/dags/<dag_id>/dag_runs from an allowlisted source IP set and return HTTP 403 otherwise.
      • Configuration hardening: [webserver] expose_config = False, rbac = True, remove the default airflow/airflow admin, regenerate the Fernet key, and explicitly set [api] enable_experimental_api = False on 1.10.x where supported.
      • Container / host hardening: run Airflow workers in a dedicated namespace or network with no egress to production databases beyond what is needed; non-root Pod SecurityContext; read-only root filesystem for webserver containers.
      • IAM least privilege: the Linux service user running the webserver must not have write access to the DAGs folder, so API-triggered code injection cannot be made persistent.
      • Monitoring baseline: pipe Prometheus or StatsD metrics into an alert that fires on sudden spikes of dag_run.created.
    3. Runbook step 3

      Detection rules

      • Reverse-proxy / webserver access logs for GET|POST /api/experimental/ without a preceding /login from the same session: index=web sourcetype=nginx uri_path="/api/experimental/*" | stats count by src_ip, uri_path, status. Any hit from external subnets is already an alert.
      • Sigma shape (process_creation): Airflow worker spawning /bin/sh -c or curl | sh shortly after an Experimental-API call — parent_image ends in airflow or python, child_image in sh|bash|curl|wget|nc. Maps to Sysmon EID 1 or auditd EXECVE.
      • Airflow-native logs ($AIRFLOW_HOME/logs/scheduler/*.log) for unexpected dag_run entries with external_trigger=True and a conf payload containing shell metacharacters — hourly diff against the baseline DAG list.
      • Network telemetry (Zeek http.log / Suricata): HTTP requests to port 8080 with URI pattern */dags/*/dag_runs lacking an Authorization header. Suricata skeleton: alert http any any -> $AIRFLOW_HOST 8080 (msg:"Airflow Experimental API unauth call"; http.uri; content:"/api/experimental/"; http.header; content:!"Authorization"; sid:1000013927;).
      • EDR process ancestry: unusual child processes under the Airflow scheduler, especially reverse-shell indicators (bash -i, python -c 'import socket', powershell -enc) — correlate as high severity with a preceding API hit.

    Detection rules

    No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.

    Classification under NIS2 and CRA

    Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.

    NIS2

    NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.

    Read in glossary
    Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
    CRA

    The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.

    Read in glossary
    Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
    ISO/IEC 27001

    ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.

    Read in glossary
    Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.

    Description

    The previous default setting for Airflow's Experimental API was to allow all API requests without authentication, but this poses security risks to users who miss this fact. From Airflow 1.10.11 the default has been changed to deny all requests by default and is documented at https://airflow.apache.org/docs/1.10.11/security.html#api-authentication. Note this change fixes it for new installs but existing users need to change their config to default `[api]auth_backend = airflow.api.auth.backend.deny_all` as mentioned in the Updating Guide: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/1.10.11/UPDATING.md#experimental-api-will-deny-all-request-by-default

    Source: BSI WID Portal

    Affected products

    The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.

    Affected products
    Affected versionsFixed in
    —Apache Airflow
    • Apache Airflow <1.10.11
    • Apache Airflow < 1.10.12
    • —
    • —
    —python/cpython
    • 0
    • 3.7.0
    • 3.8.0
    • 3.9.0
    • < 3.6.13
    • < 3.7.10
    • < 3.8.8
    • < 3.9.2
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • 3.6.13
    • 3.7.10
    • 3.8.8
    • 3.9.2
    Apache Software FoundationApache Airflow
    • 1.10.10 and below
    • Apache Airflow – < 1.10.13
    • Apache Airflow – < 1.10.14
    • Apache Airflow – < 1.10.15
    • Apache Airflow – < 2.1.2
    • Apache Airflow 2.0.0
    • Apache Airflow 2.0.1
    • —
    • 1.10.13
    • 1.10.14
    • 1.10.15
    • 2.1.2
    • —
    • —
    apacheairflow
    • 1.0.0 – < 1.10.15
    • 2.0.0 – < 2.0.2
    • ≤ 1.10.10
    • < 1.10.11
    • < 1.10.13
    • < 1.10.14
    • < 1.10.15
    • < 2.1.2
    • 1.10.15
    • 2.0.2
    • —
    • 1.10.11
    • 1.10.13
    • 1.10.14
    • 1.10.15
    • 2.1.2
    djangoprojectdjango
    • 2.2 – < 2.2.19
    • 3.0 – < 3.0.13
    • 3.1 – < 3.1.7
    • 2.2.19
    • 3.0.13
    • 3.1.7
    netappcloud_backup
    • —
    • —
    netappinventory_collect_tool
    • —
    • —
    netappontap_select_deploy_administration_utility
    • —
    • —
    netappsnapcenter
    • —
    • —
    oraclecommunications_offline_mediation_controller
    • 12.0.0.3.0
    • —
    oraclecommunications_pricing_design_center
    • 12.0.0.3.0
    • —
    oracleenterprise_manager_ops_center
    • 12.4.0.0
    • —
    pythonpython
    • 3.7.0 – < 3.7.10
    • 3.8.0 – < 3.8.8
    • 3.9.0 – < 3.9.2
    • < 3.6.13
    • 3.7.10
    • 3.8.8
    • 3.9.2
    • 3.6.13
    FortinetFortiAnalyzer
    • < 6.4.8
    • < 7.0.3
    • 6.4.8
    • 7.0.3
    pypiapache-airflow
    • 1.10.0
    • 1.10.1
    • 1.10.10
    • 1.10.10rc1
    • 1.10.10rc2
    • 1.10.10rc3
    • 1.10.10rc4
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —
    • —

    Vendors and products

    Affected operating systems

    Affected operating systems
    Linuxdebiandebian_linux9.0
    Otherfedoraprojectfedora33
    Otherfedoraprojectfedora32
    Otherfedoraprojectfedora34
    Otheroraclezfs_storage_appliance8.8

    Weakness classes (CWE)

    • CWE-306Missing Authentication for Critical Function

      Base

      The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-306
    • CWE-1188Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default

      Base

      The product initializes or sets a resource with a default that is intended to be changed by the product's installer, administrator, or maintainer, but the default is not secure.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-1188
    • CWE-1056Invokable Control Element with Variadic Parameters

      Base

      A named-callable or method control element has a signature that supports a variable (variadic) number of parameters or arguments.

      Entry at MITRE CWE-1056

    Public exploit references

    Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.

    Public exploit references
    CISA KEV CatalogCISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.govactively exploited
    Packet StormApache Airflow 1.10.10 Remote Code Execution (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified—
    Packet StormApache Airflow 1.10.10 Remote Code Execution (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.comPoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified—

    References & sources

    • fortiguard.fortinet.comFortinet Security Advisory vom 2022-06-07BSI
    • lists.apache.orgthread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c1…web, x_refsource_MISC, Mailing list, Vendor advisory
    • GitHub Security Advisoriesadvisories/GHSA-m6h2-jx9v-58w6advisory
    • NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2021-35936web
    • github.comapache/airflow/commit/27265516d2b897585f5019ecd820cfe5471fd351web
    • github.comapache/airflow/commit/7a5bb88ad78d600fbb1676a55752597928115bd8web
    • github.comapache/airflow/commit/d772f38f843b9add5319a01cf51a844145b01f63web
    • github.comapache/airflowpackage
    • github.comapache/airflow/compare/2.1.1...2.1.2web
    • github.compypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/apache-airflow/PYSEC-202…web
    • lists.apache.orgthread.html/r4656959c8ed06c1f6202d89aa4e67b35ad7bdba5a666caff3f…web, x_refsource_MISC, Issue tracking, Mailing list, Vendor advisory
    • lists.apache.orgthread.html/r2892ef594dbbf54d0939b808626f52f7c2d1584f8aa1d81570…web
    • lists.apache.orgthread.html/r4656959c8ed06c1f6202d89aa4e67b35ad7bdba5a666caff3f…web
    • lists.apache.orgthread.html/r2892ef594dbbf54d0939b808626f52f7c2d1584f8aa1d81570…web
    • openwall.com[oss-security] 20201211 CVE-2020-17515: Apache Airflow Reflected XSS via Origin Parameterweb, Mailing list, x_refsource_MLIST, Mailing list, Vendor advisory
    • lists.apache.orgthread.html/r2892ef594dbbf54d0939b808626f52f7c2d1584f8aa1d81570…web
    • lists.apache.orgthread.html/ra8ce70088ba291f358e077cafdb14d174b7a1ce9a9d86d1b33…web
    • openwall.com[oss-security] 20210501 CVE-2021-28359: Apache Airflow Reflected XSS via Origin Query Argument in URLweb, Mailing list, x_refsource_MLIST, Mailing list, Third-party advisory
    • lists.apache.orgthread.html/rc005f4de9d9b0ba943ceb8ff5a21a5c6ff8a9df52632476698…web
    • GitHub Security Advisoriesadvisories/GHSA-86vp-x3pr-79rxadvisory

    Linked CVEs

    Linked CVEs
    MediumCVE-2021-35936No Authentication on Logging Server5.3—
    MediumCVE-2021-28359Apache Airflow Reflected XSS via Origin Query Argument in URL6.1—
    MediumCVE-2021-23336Web Cache Poisoning5.9—
    HighCVE-2020-17526Apache Airflow: security vulnerability7.7—
    MediumCVE-2020-17515Apache Airflow: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)6.1—
    MediumCVE-2020-17513Apache Airflow: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)5.3—
    MediumCVE-2020-13944Apache Airflow: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)6.1—
    CriticalCVE-2020-13927Apache Airflow's Experimental API Authentication Bypass9.8Actively exploited
    CriticalCVE-2020-11982Apache Airflow: Deserialization of Untrusted Data9.8—
    CriticalCVE-2020-11981Apache Airflow: security vulnerability9.8—
    Embed badge

    Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.

    Badge preview for CVE-2020-13927
    <a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2020-13927"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2020-13927.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2020-13927 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>