Linux Kernel: security vulnerability (CVE-2026-72367)
Published Last modified Sources: Ubuntu, Debian, CVE.org, BSI
What is affected, what to do
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iomap: guard io_size EOF trim against concurrent truncate underflow iomap: fix zero padding data issue in concurrent append writes changed ioend accounting so that io_size tracks only valid data within EOF. This trims io_size when a writeback range extends past end_pos: ioend->io_size += map_len; if (ioend->io_offset + ioend->io_size > end_pos) ioend->io_size = end_pos - ioend->io_offset; However, if end_pos ends up below ioend->io_offset, the subtraction becomes negative and is stored in size_t io_size, causing an unsigned wrap to a huge value.
Update Linux Kernel to version 6.12.114, Linux Kernel to version 6.18.40, Linux Kernel to version 7.1.5.
- Affected
- Linux Kernel
lt 6.12.10..6.12.114 - Linux Kernel
lt 6.13..6.18.40 - Linux Kernel
lt 6.19..7.1.5
- Linux Kernel
- Fixed in
- Linux Kernel
6.12.114 - Linux Kernel
6.18.40 - Linux Kernel
7.1.5 - Linux Kernel
7.2
- Linux Kernel
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
8.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
8.8
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: Ubuntu, Debian, CVE.org, BSI
0.6 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 48.9
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 85.75 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 8.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 8.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.6 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 48.9
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iomap: guard io_size EOF trim against concurrent truncate underflow iomap: fix zero padding data issue in concurrent append writes changed ioend accounting so that io_size tracks only valid data within EOF. This trims io_size when a writeback range extends past end_pos: ioend->io_size += map_len; if (ioend->io_offset + ioend->io_size > end_pos) ioend->io_size = end_pos - ioend->io_offset; However, if end_pos ends up below ioend->io_offset, the subtraction becomes negative and is stored in size_t io_size, causing an unsigned wrap to a huge value. This can happen when writeback continues past byte-level EOF up to a block-aligned range, or when a concurrent truncate shrinks the file after end_pos was sampled in iomap_writeback_handle_eof(). A wrapped io_size can mislead append detection and corrupt completion-time size handling, since filesystem end_io paths consume io_size for decisions such as on-disk EOF updates and unwritten/COW completion ranges. Fix this by clamping io_size to zero when EOF has moved to or before the ioend start offset. This preserves the original intent of trimming io_size to valid in-EOF data while avoiding the underflow.
Source: Ubuntu Security Notices, Debian Security Advisories, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Linux | debian | linux | trixie |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-aws-7.0 | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-7.0 | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fde | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-azure-fde-7.0 | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gcp-7.0 | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-gke | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-hwe-7.0 | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-ibm | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-oem-7.0 | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-oracle | resolute |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-oracle-7.0 | noble |
| Linux | ubuntu | linux-realtime | resolute |
References & sources
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/1f38f65bf965fce9aa159d45c5347538f56c5973
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/7f7780abb4c0fdc9a2603aea8e985ff14ee900e0
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/55ec50d046c03b3724741957f7b007856e36dbe7
- git.kernel.orgstable/c/cc1d6af0bee27d6595908b497424f338161299fc
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedLinux
New references:Show 8 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) added —Affected value modified. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/72xxx/CVE-2026-72367.json">CVE-2026-72367</a>Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1f38f65bf965fce9aa159d45c5347538f56c5973Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55ec50d046c03b3724741957f7b007856e36dbe7Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7f7780abb4c0fdc9a2603aea8e985ff14ee900e0Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cc1d6af0bee27d6595908b497424f338161299fcReference removed https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1f38f65bf965fce9aa159d45c5347538f56c5973—Reference removed https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55ec50d046c03b3724741957f7b007856e36dbe7—Reference removed https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7f7780abb4c0fdc9a2603aea8e985ff14ee900e0—Source identifier: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
Record modifiedLinux
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After CVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HAffected versions (publisher) changed Linux, LinuxLinux, LinuxSource identifier: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
ReceivedLinux
Description added or changed
Show 5 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) added —Linux, LinuxDescription added —In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iomap: guard io_size EOF trim against concurrent truncate underflow iomap: fix zero padding data issue in concurrent append writes changed ioend accounting so that io_size tracks only valid data within EOF. This trims io_size when a writeback range extends past end_pos: ioend->io_size += map_len; if (ioend->io_offset + ioend->io_size > end_pos) ioend->io_size = end_pos - ioend->io_offset; However, if end_pos ends up below ioend->io_offset, the subtraction becomes negative and is stored in size_t io_size, causing an unsigned wrap to a huge value. This can happen when writeback continues past byte-level EOF up to a block-aligned range, or when a concurrent truncate shrinks the file after end_pos was sampled in iomap_writeback_handle_eof(). A wrapped io_size can mislead append detection and corrupt completion-time size handling, since filesystem end_io paths consume io_size for decisions such as on-disk EOF updates and unwritten/COW completion ranges. Fix this by clamping io_size to zero when EOF has moved to or before the ioend start offset. This preserves the original intent of trimming io_size to valid in-EOF data while avoiding the underflow.Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1f38f65bf965fce9aa159d45c5347538f56c5973Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55ec50d046c03b3724741957f7b007856e36dbe7Reference added —https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7f7780abb4c0fdc9a2603aea8e985ff14ee900e0Source identifier: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-72367"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-72367.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-72367 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>