Unbounded memory allocation in the Prometheus rule conversion API (CVE-2026-33374)
Published Last modified Sources: Red Hat, OSV, CVE.org, BSI
What is affected, what to do
A flaw was found in Grafana. The Prometheus rule conversion API endpoints fail to enforce a limit on request body sizes.
Update Grafana Enterprise to version 12.4.13, Grafana Enterprise to version 13.0.11, Grafana Enterprise to version 13.1.8.
- Affected
- Grafana Enterprise
lte 12.0.0..12.3.11 - Grafana Enterprise
lt 12.4.0..12.4.13 - Grafana Enterprise
lt 13.0.0..13.0.11 - Grafana Enterprise
lt 13.1.0..13.1.8 - Grafana Enterprise
lt 13.2.0..13.2.4 - Grafana OSS
lte 12.0.0..12.3.11 - Grafana OSS
lt 12.4.0..12.4.13 - Grafana OSS
lt 13.0.0..13.0.11 - Grafana OSS
lt 13.1.0..13.1.8 - Grafana OSS
lt 13.2.0..13.2.4
- Grafana Enterprise
- Fixed in
- Grafana Enterprise
12.4.13 - Grafana Enterprise
13.0.11 - Grafana Enterprise
13.1.8 - Grafana Enterprise
13.2.4 - Grafana OSS
12.4.13 - Grafana OSS
13.0.11 - Grafana OSS
13.1.8 - Grafana OSS
13.2.4
- Grafana Enterprise
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
6.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
6.5
CVSS v3
Severity Medium on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: Red Hat, OSV, CVE.org, BSI
0.4 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 30.6
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Medium
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 69.95 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 6.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 6.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.4 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 30.6
- Elevated — this CVE ranks above at least 10% of all CVEs scored today.
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: none known · not automatable · Technical impact: partial
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 13 October 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-770, CWE-400, CWE-789
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
A flaw was found in Grafana. The Prometheus rule conversion API endpoints fail to enforce a limit on request body sizes. An authenticated user can exploit this vulnerability by submitting excessively large requests to trigger unbounded memory allocation, which crashes the server and results in a Denial of Service (DoS).
Source: redhat_csaf, OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities), NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, BSI WID Portal, BSI CSAF
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Grafana | Grafana Enterprise |
|
|
| Grafana | Grafana OSS |
|
|
| Grafana | Grafana |
|
|
Distribution and container packages (4)
Downstream packages (e.g. Bitnami, Debian, Ubuntu, Red Hat). Versions refer to the distribution, not the vendor.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| bitnami | grafana |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-770Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
Base
The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.
Entry at MITRE CWE-770CWE-400Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Class
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.
Entry at MITRE CWE-400CWE-789Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value
Variant
The product allocates memory based on an untrusted, large size value, but it does not ensure that the size is within expected limits, allowing arbitrary amounts of memory to be allocated.
Entry at MITRE CWE-789
References & sources
- grafana.comsecurity/security-advisories/cve-2026-33374Vendor advisory, web
- NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33374web
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: none known, automatable: no
Show the original change
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After SSVC assessment added —{"id":"CVE-2026-33374","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-10-13T17:25:44.714882Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
Receivedgrafana.com
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness type: CWE-400, CWE-770, CWE-789
Description added or changed
Show 7 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description added —The Prometheus rule conversion API endpoints in Grafana do not limit request body size, allowing authenticated users to trigger unbounded memory allocations that can crash the server through out-of-memory conditions.CVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HWeakness type (CWE) added —CWE-400Weakness type (CWE) added —CWE-770Weakness type (CWE) added —CWE-789Affected versions (publisher) added —New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/33xxx/CVE-2026-33374.json">CVE-2026-33374</a>Reference added —https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-33374Source identifier: security@grafana.com
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-33374"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-33374.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-33374 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>