A2A Java SDK has a fail-open default task authorization (CVE-2026-111764)
Published Last modified Sources: CVE.org, OSV, Hersteller
What is affected, what to do
Update A2aproject A2a-java to version 1.3.0.Final.
- Affected
- A2aproject A2a-java
lt *..1.3.0.Final
- A2aproject A2a-java
- Fixed in
- A2aproject A2a-java
1.3.0.Final
- A2aproject A2a-java
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: Vendor (CNA), CVSS v3
7.5
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org, OSV, Hersteller
0.6 %
EPSS score
Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 48.9
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 86.64 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 0.6 %
- Low — model estimates < 1% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 48.9
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: proof of concept · automatable · Technical impact: partial
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 20 October 2026
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-1188, CWE-862
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Draft text for GHSA-qw47-mcm5-934w. The body below drops into the GitHub advisory description field; the metadata block maps to the form fields. Set the patched version at release; publish when the fix ships._
- Ecosystem: Maven
- Affected package:
org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-server-common(task store / authorization) - Affected versions:
<= 1.2.0.Final(and1.2.1.Final-SNAPSHOTonmainprior to the fix) - Patched version: (the release that carries the fix, e.g. 1.2.1.Final)
- CWE: CWE-1188 (Insecure Default Initialization), CWE-862 (Missing Authorization)
- Severity: High
- CVSS v3.1:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N(7.5, High)
Details
The default task store performs no authorization on task reads. InMemoryTaskStore's no-arg
constructor sets authorizationProvider = null, and InMemoryTaskStore.get(String taskId) is a
bare map lookup with no authorization check regardless of provider:
public InMemoryTaskStore() {
this.authorizationProvider = null; // default wiring
}
@Override
public @Nullable Task get(String taskId) {
return tasks.get(taskId); // no owner / caller check
}
Authorization is enforced only when the application both supplies a TaskAuthorizationProvider
and routes requests through AuthorizationRequestHandlerDecorator (via CDI), which checks
ownership before delegating. A server that uses the default store, or wires
DefaultRequestHandler.builder().build() manually, or integrates through a non-CDI stack (e.g.
Spring), never reaches that check. The safe posture is therefore opt-in and the shipped default is
the unsafe one. A caller can read a task created by another caller simply by knowing or guessing
its id.
Summary
With the SDK's default configuration, task reads are not authorized: any caller can retrieve a task (including its status, context, message history, and artifacts) created by another caller, by supplying the task id.
PoC
Using only the real production classes wired the default way (no mocks):
- Construct the default store:
InMemoryTaskStore store = new InMemoryTaskStore();(no-arg constructor, so no authorization provider). - As one caller, save a task:
store.save(victimTask, false);with idvictim-task-42. - As a second, unrelated caller with no auth context, read it back:
store.get("victim-task-42").
The second caller receives the first caller's task in full, with no authorization check:
unauthenticated get(victim-task-42) returned task owned by nobody-checked: victim-task-42 / ctx=victim-ctx
Verified on main (commit 72d220c, JDK 21) and reproduces unchanged on 1.2.0.Final.
Impact
Task data crosses caller boundaries with no authorization. In any multi-caller deployment built on
the default wiring, one caller can enumerate and read another caller's tasks, including task status,
context id, the message history, and any artifacts the task carries, which for agent workloads is
frequently sensitive input and generated content. Because the insecure behaviour is the default
rather than a misconfiguration, it is easy to ship unintentionally, and in the default/reference
deployment the transport endpoints are served without authentication enforced, so the read is
reachable by an unauthenticated caller (PR:N). CVSS is scored against the default configuration
as shipped.
Remediation
Fail closed by default: deny task reads when no authorization provider is configured, rather than
treating a missing provider as allow-all, and apply the authorization check in the store's get
path (not only in list and the CDI decorator) so it holds regardless of how the handler is
wired. If the current permissive default is retained for single-user/testing scenarios, emit a
prominent startup warning when the server comes up with no authorization provider so it cannot be
shipped by accident.
Workarounds
Until a fixed release, configure a TaskAuthorizationProvider and ensure requests are routed
through the authorization decorator (CDI wiring), rather than relying on the default no-arg store
or a manually built handler.
References
- CWE-1188: Insecure Default Initialization of Resource: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1188.html
- CWE-862: Missing Authorization: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/862.html
Source: NVD (NIST), OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities), GitHub Security Advisories, cvelistv5
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| a2aproject | a2a-java |
|
|
| maven | org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-server-common |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-1188Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default
Base
The product initializes or sets a resource with a default that is intended to be changed by the product's installer, administrator, or maintainer, but the default is not secure.
Entry at MITRE CWE-1188CWE-862Missing Authorization
Class
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
Entry at MITRE CWE-862
References & sources
- github.coma2aproject/a2a-java/commit/efb4e985e99390c4fc1f78c0a187a4254c0a…x_refsource_MISC, web
- github.coma2aproject/a2a-java/pull/1095x_refsource_MISC, web
- github.coma2aproject/a2a-java/releases/tag/v1.3.0.Finalx_refsource_MISC, web
- github.coma2aproject/a2a-java/security/advisories/GHSA-qw47-mcm5-934wx_refsource_CONFIRM, web
- NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2026-111764advisory
- github.coma2aproject/a2a-javapackage
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
Record modifiedCISA ADP
CISA assessment (SSVC): exploitation: proof of concept, automatable: yes
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Reference added —https://github.com/a2aproject/a2a-java/security/advisories/GHSA-qw47-mcm5-934wSSVC assessment added —{"id":"CVE-2026-111764","role":"CISA Coordinator","options":[{"exploitation":"poc"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"version":"2.0.3","timestamp":"2026-10-20T16:15:13.020004Z"}Source identifier: 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0
ReceivedGitHub
CVSS V3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness type: CWE-1188, CWE-862
Description added or changed
Show 9 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Description added —A2A Java SDK is the official Java SDK for the Agent2Agent (A2A) Protocol. Prior to 1.3.0.Final, the default InMemoryTaskStore configuration performs no authorization on task reads: the no-argument constructor sets authorizationProvider to null, and InMemoryTaskStore.get(String taskId) returns the stored task without checking the caller or owner. Authorization depends on supplying a TaskAuthorizationProvider and routing requests through AuthorizationRequestHandlerDecorator, whether installed through CDI or explicitly by the application. Default store wiring and manually constructed DefaultRequestHandler.builder().build() handlers, including integrations such as Spring, leave task reads unprotected when no effective authorization-provider and decorator check is installed. In a multi-caller deployment using the default configuration, a caller who knows or guesses another caller's task ID can retrieve the task status, context ID, message history, and artifacts. The default/reference transport endpoints do not enforce authentication, so the task-read disclosure is reachable by an unauthenticated caller rather than requiring a privileged account. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.0.Final.CVSS added —AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NWeakness type (CWE) added —CWE-1188Weakness type (CWE) added —CWE-862Affected versions (publisher) added —New affected value received. <a href="https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/blob/main/cves/2026/111xxx/CVE-2026-111764.json">CVE-2026-111764</a>Reference added —https://github.com/a2aproject/a2a-java/commit/efb4e985e99390c4fc1f78c0a187a4254c0a2553Reference added —https://github.com/a2aproject/a2a-java/pull/1095Reference added —https://github.com/a2aproject/a2a-java/releases/tag/v1.3.0.FinalReference added —https://github.com/a2aproject/a2a-java/security/advisories/GHSA-qw47-mcm5-934wSource identifier: security-advisories@github.com
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2026-111764"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2026-111764.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2026-111764 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>