Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory (“path traversal”) (CVE-2024-1708)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: pwn.watch, CVE.org, EUVD
What is affected, what to do
ConnectWise ScreenConnect 23.9.7 and prior are affected by path-traversal vulnerability, which may allow an attacker the ability to execute remote code or directly impact confidential data or critical systems.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. Update screenconnect to version 23.9.8. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- ConnectWise ScreenConnect
lte *..23.9.7
- ConnectWise ScreenConnect
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
8.4
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
8.4
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: pwn.watch, CVE.org, EUVD
95.4 %
EPSS score
High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.87
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 251.36 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploited
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 8.4 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 8.4
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 95.4 %
- High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 99.87
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossaryCWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-22
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
The flaw is network-reachable with low attack complexity and, chained with CVE-2024-1709, effectively yields unauthenticated code execution with a scope change onto every managed system; it sits among the CVEs most likely to be exploited, and CISA flags known use in ransomware campaigns. Managed service providers and internal IT teams are the prime targets, because a single ScreenConnect server is a pivot into many customer or business-unit networks — a supply-chain risk squarely within NIS2. Rate any internet-exposed on-premises server on 23.9.7 or earlier as critical with immediate action required and treat it as compromised until proven otherwise; patched, internal-only instances drop back to normal priority.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Upgrade every on-premises instance to ScreenConnect 23.9.8 or later now. Versions 23.9.7 and earlier are affected. Cloud-hosted instances (screenconnect.com/hostedrmm.com) are patched centrally by the vendor, but confirm the running version in the admin console anyway. For licensing/maintenance specifics: patch available from the vendor — check the vendor advisory for details.
- Pull unpatched servers off the internet. Block the web interface (default 8040/TCP, or 443 behind a reverse proxy) and the relay port (default 8041/TCP) at the perimeter until the upgrade is done. ScreenConnect is a remote-access tool — a compromised server means hands-on access to every managed endpoint.
- Assume chaining with CVE-2024-1709. CVE-2024-1708 formally requires admin privileges, but in practice it is paired with the CVE-2024-1709 authentication bypass (
SetupWizard.aspx). Both are fixed in 23.9.8 — treat any exposed, unpatched server as potentially compromised. - Compromise check before returning to service: review
App_Data\User.xmlfor unknown admin accounts, inspectApp_Extensions\for foreign.aspx/.ashx/.dllfiles, reset all ScreenConnect user passwords and enforce MFA. - If you find indicators: open an incident under your reporting process (NIS2: early warning within 24 h to the national CSIRT/authority), image the server, and sweep all endpoints reachable from it for newly installed remote-access agents, persistence and ransomware staging.
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network segmentation: expose the ScreenConnect web UI only via VPN/ZTNA or an admin IP allowlist; restrict the relay port to known client network ranges.
- Reverse proxy/WAF: hard-block requests to
/SetupWizard.aspx(including trailing-path variants like/SetupWizard.aspx/…) once initial setup is complete. Drop extension uploads (ZIP archives containing../or..\in entry names) at the proxy. - Server endpoint hardening: tighten ACLs so the ScreenConnect service account cannot write to the web root beyond what is required; use WDAC/AppLocker to stop
cmd.exe/powershell.exelaunching as children ofScreenConnect.Service.exe. - IAM/least privilege: minimise ScreenConnect admins, mandate MFA, replace local accounts with SSO/IdP integration, and restrict extension installation to a dedicated admin role.
- Client side: on managed endpoints, allow the ScreenConnect client to connect only to your own relay host; block unknown ScreenConnect instances (foreign relay hosts) via proxy/DNS filtering — attackers frequently deploy their own instances for persistence.
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Sysmon EID 11 / EDR file events: creation of
.aspx,.ashxor.dllunder…\ScreenConnect\App_Extensions\outside planned maintenance. Sigma shape:TargetFilename|contains: '\ScreenConnect\App_Extensions\' and TargetFilename|endswith: ['.aspx','.ashx']. - Process ancestry (Sysmon EID 1 / Security 4688):
ScreenConnect.Service.exespawningcmd.exe/powershell.exe/csc.exeon the server. KQL:DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName =~ "ScreenConnect.Service.exe" | where FileName in~ ("cmd.exe","powershell.exe","pwsh.exe","rundll32.exe"). Note:ScreenConnect.ClientService.exeon endpoints launches shells legitimately — baseline before alerting there. - Web/proxy access logs: hits on
SetupWizard.aspxafter initial setup, especially with an appended path segment, followed by extension-upload POSTs from unfamiliar source IPs. SPL:index=proxy uri_path="*SetupWizard.aspx*" | stats count by src_ip, uri_path. - File integrity: changes to
App_Data\User.xml(Sysmon EID 11 or FIM) and newly created admin accounts, correlated with logins from unusual geolocations. - Downstream endpoint activity: bulk remote commands or tool pushes through ScreenConnect sessions, installation of additional RMM agents, Defender being disabled (Event ID 5001) — classic precursors to ransomware deployment.
- Sysmon EID 11 / EDR file events: creation of
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
ConnectWise ScreenConnect 23.9.7 and prior are affected by path-traversal vulnerability, which may allow an attacker the ability to execute remote code or directly impact confidential data or critical systems.
Source: pwn.watch, NVD (NIST), CISA KEV Catalog, cvelistv5, ENISA EUVD, CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ConnectWise | ScreenConnect |
|
|
| connectwise | screenconnect |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-22Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
Base
The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.
Entry at MITRE CWE-22
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| PoC-in-GitHub (nomi-sec) | cve-2024-1708-connectwise_rce_reproduction (opens in a new tab)github.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified |
References & sources
- connectwise.comConnectWise ScreenConnect 23.9.8 security bulletineuvd, Vendor advisory, pwn-watch
- huntress.comblog/a-catastrophe-for-control-understanding-the-screenconnect-…euvd, Exploit, Third-party advisory
- microsoft.comen-us/security/blog/2026/04/06/storm-1175-focuses-gaze-on-vulne…Third-party advisory, Technical description
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2024-1708government-resource, Third-party advisory, US government resource
- pwn.watchpwn.watch: ConnectWise ScreenConnect auth bypass mass-exploitedpwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2024-1709pwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2024-1708pwn-watch
- cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2024-1708"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2024-1708.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2024-1708 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>