Glibc: potential use-after-free in getaddrinfo() (CVE-2023-4806)
Published Sources: Siemens ProductCERT, CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
A flaw has been identified in glibc. In an extremely rare situation, the getaddrinfo function may access memory that has been freed, resulting in an application crash.
Update Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 to version 0:2.28-225.el8_8.6, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support to version 0:2.28-189.8.el8_6, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 to version 0:2.34-60.el9_2.7.
- Affected
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
lt *..0:2.28-225.el8_8.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support
lt *..0:2.28-189.8.el8_6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
lt *..0:2.34-60.el9_2.7 - Red Hat Virtualization 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
lt *..0:2.28-189.8.el8_6
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- Fixed in
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
0:2.28-225.el8_8.6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support
0:2.28-189.8.el8_6 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
0:2.34-60.el9_2.7 - Red Hat Virtualization 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
0:2.28-189.8.el8_6
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
5.9
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
5.9
CVSS v3
Severity Medium on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: Siemens ProductCERT, CVE.org
1.6 %
EPSS score
Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 75.8
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Medium
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 78.87 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- no public PoC known
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 5.9 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 5.9
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 1.6 %
- Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 75.8
- High — this CVE ranks above the median of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 36%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-416
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Handle the vulnerability in regular vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
A flaw has been identified in glibc. In an extremely rare situation, the getaddrinfo function may access memory that has been freed, resulting in an application crash. This issue is only exploitable when a NSS module implements only the _nss_*_gethostbyname2_r and _nss_*_getcanonname_r hooks without implementing the _nss_*_gethostbyname3_r hook. The resolved name should return a large number of IPv6 and IPv4, and the call to the getaddrinfo function should have the AF_INET6 address family with AI_CANONNAME, AI_ALL and AI_V4MAPPED as flags.
Source: siemens_advisory, cvelistv5, NVD (NIST)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 |
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Virtualization 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 |
|
|
| gnu | glibc |
|
|
| redhat | codeready_linux_builder_eus |
|
|
| redhat | codeready_linux_builder_eus_for_power_little_endian |
|
|
| redhat | codeready_linux_builder_eus_for_power_little_endian_eus |
|
|
| redhat | codeready_linux_builder_for_arm64 |
|
|
| redhat | codeready_linux_builder_for_arm64_eus |
|
|
| redhat | codeready_linux_builder_for_ibm_z_systems |
|
|
| redhat | codeready_linux_builder_for_ibm_z_systems_eus |
|
|
Vendors and products
- Fedora Project Infrastructure Fedora
- GNU GNU glibc
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Support
- Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- Red Hat Red Hat Virtualization 4 For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- Red Hat Codeready Linux Builder Eus
- Red Hat Codeready Linux Builder Eus For Power Little Endian
- Red Hat Codeready Linux Builder Eus For Power Little Endian Eus
- Red Hat Codeready Linux Builder For Arm64
Affected operating systems
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux | 7.0 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux | 8.0 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux | 9.0 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_eus | 8.8 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_eus | 9.2 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_for_arm_64 | 9.0_aarch64 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_for_arm_64_eus | 9.2_aarch64 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems | 8.0_s390x |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems_eus | 8.8_s390x |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems_eus_s390x | 9.2 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems_s390x | 9.2 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian | 8.0_ppc64le |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian | 9.2_ppc64le |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian_eus | 8.8_ppc64le |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian_eus | 9.2_ppc64le |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_server_aus | 9.2 |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_server_for_power_little_endian_update_services_for_sap_solutions | 9.2_ppc64le |
| Linux | redhat | enterprise_linux_tus | 8.8 |
| Other | fedoraproject | fedora | 37 |
| Other | fedoraproject | fedora | 38 |
| Other | fedoraproject | fedora | 39 |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-416Use After Free
Variant
The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.
Entry at MITRE CWE-416
References & sources
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2023:5453Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2023:5455Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comRHSA-2023:7409Vendor advisory, x_refsource_REDHAT
- access.redhat.comsecurity/cve/CVE-2023-4806Vulnerability database, x_refsource_REDHAT
- bugzilla.redhat.comRHBZ#2237782Issue tracking, x_refsource_REDHAT
- openwall.comlists/oss-security/2023/10/03/4x_transferred
- openwall.comlists/oss-security/2023/10/03/5x_transferred
- openwall.comlists/oss-security/2023/10/03/6x_transferred
- openwall.comlists/oss-security/2023/10/03/8x_transferred
- lists.fedoraproject.orgarchives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/…x_transferred
- lists.fedoraproject.orgarchives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/…x_transferred
- lists.fedoraproject.orgarchives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/…x_transferred
- security.gentoo.orgglsa/202310-03x_transferred
- security.netapp.comadvisory/ntap-20240125-0008x_transferred
- Siemens ProductCERTproductcert/html/ssa-831302.html
- Siemens ProductCERTproductcert/html/ssa-082556.html
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2023-4806"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2023-4806.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2023-4806 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>