Adobe ColdFusion Improper Access Control Arbitrary code execution (CVE-2023-26360)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: SingCERT, pwn.watch, CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
The vulnerability CVE-2023-26360 allows for remote code execution (RCE) via deserialization of untrusted data in Adobe ColdFusion. An attacker can execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user without user interaction or authentication. The vulnerability is actively exploited and is listed in the CISA KEV catalog. Affected are Adobe ColdFusion versions 2018 Update 15 and earlier, and 2021 Update 5 and earlier. Immediate patching to the latest version is urgently required.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Adobe ColdFusion
eq 2018..2018 - Adobe ColdFusion
eq 2021..2021
- Adobe ColdFusion
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
8.6
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
8.6
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: SingCERT, pwn.watch, CVE.org
97.3 %
EPSS score
High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.90
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 225.23 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploited
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 8.6 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 8.6
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 97.3 %
- High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 99.90
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossaryCWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-284
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This CVE is on KEV because it is reachable over the network without authentication and yields direct remote code execution on the application server, and because working exploit code has been publicly available since the original disclosure. Observed activity ranges from opportunistic internet-wide scanning for exposed admin endpoints to targeted intrusions against government and mid-market organisations still running ColdFusion for legacy portals. Treat any internet-facing instance as a 24-48 h patch SLA; internal instances with sensitive datasources follow in the next wave. Exploitation likelihood sits among the highest of the entire KEV catalogue, so the ticket must bypass the regular monthly patch cycle.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Deploy the Adobe patches: ColdFusion 2018 Update 16 (APSB23-25) and ColdFusion 2021 Update 6; bring ColdFusion 2023 to the latest update as well. Restart the ColdFusion service and verify administrator login after patching.
- Inventory exposure: enumerate every ColdFusion instance reachable from the internet on TCP/80, /443, /8500 and /8300 using internal masscan/nmap sweeps. Patch internet-facing hosts first, internal hosts second.
- If the patch cannot land within 24 h, block external access to
/CFIDE/administrator/,/CFIDE/adminapi/and/cf_scripts/at the reverse proxy or WAF; only allow a dedicated admin jump host. - Perform a compromise check BEFORE patching: look for unknown
.cfm,.cfml,.jspfiles under the webroot andcfusion/wwwroot/CFIDE/dated after 1 February 2023 (find … -newermt 2023-02-01 -name "*.cfm"). Preserve suspicious files for forensics, do not delete. - Rotate service credentials: if ColdFusion runs under a domain account or stores datasource secrets in
neo-datasource.xml, rotate all database, SMTP and administrator passwords after patching — anyone with RCE already had access to them. - Tighten egress: restrict outbound connections from the ColdFusion host to the datasources, SMTP and update servers it actually needs; specifically block arbitrary outbound 443/80 to cloud hosters and the usual reverse-shell ports (4444, 8080).
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network: place the ColdFusion admin interface on a management VLAN, accessible only via VPN or jump host. Terminate HTTP on a reverse proxy (nginx, Apache, F5) in front of ColdFusion and whitelist the actual application paths — everything matching
/CFIDE/administrator*and/CFIDE/adminapi*returns 403 externally. - WAF rule: block HTTP requests hitting the ColdFusion admin paths above, requests with
?locale=abuse patterns, and payloads carrying Java-serialisation markers (rO0AB,aced0005) in body or query. Enable ModSecurity CRS rule families 942/943 and raise paranoia level. - Endpoint hardening: run the ColdFusion service under a dedicated, non-privileged account (never LocalSystem or root). On Windows add an AppLocker rule preventing
cfusion\jre\bin\java.exefrom spawningcmd.exe,powershell.exeorrundll32.exe. On Linux apply an SELinux or AppArmor profile denyingexecfrom the coldfusion domain. - Configuration hardening per the Adobe ColdFusion Lockdown Guide: disable Robust Exception Information, enable Sandbox Security, disable or rename unused CFIDE services such as
/CFIDE/componentutils/and/CFIDE/scripts/. - IAM: rotate the ColdFusion administrator password and the RDS password, and disable RDS entirely if not needed. Grant datasource accounts least privilege at the DBMS (no
xp_cmdshell, noFILEprivilege). - Backup and recovery: capture an offline snapshot of the web application and its database as a rollback point before applying the patch — if a webshell is already persisted, patching alone will not evict the intruder.
- Network: place the ColdFusion admin interface on a management VLAN, accessible only via VPN or jump host. Terminate HTTP on a reverse proxy (nginx, Apache, F5) in front of ColdFusion and whitelist the actual application paths — everything matching
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Web access logs: POST or GET requests to
/CFIDE/administrator/,/CFIDE/adminapi/administrator.cfc,/CFIDE/wizards/common/_logintowizard.cfmfrom external source IPs returning HTTP 200. Sigma shape:selection: cs-uri-stem|contains: '/CFIDE/adminapi/'combined withsc-status: 200andc-ip not in internal_admin_range. - Process ancestry (Sysmon EID 1 / EDR):
coldfusion.exe,jrun.exeor the ColdFusionjava.exespawningcmd.exe,powershell.exe,whoami.exe,net.exe,certutil.exeorbitsadmin.exe. KQL:DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName in~ ('coldfusion.exe','java.exe') and FileName in~ ('cmd.exe','powershell.exe','whoami.exe'). - File system (Sysmon EID 11 / auditd
watchon CFIDE directories): new.cfm,.cfml,.jspor.classfiles appearing inwwwroot\CFIDE\,cfusion\wwwroot\,/opt/coldfusion*/cfusion/wwwroot/. Flag names that look random, e.g.[a-z0-9]{6,12}\.cfm. - Network telemetry (Zeek, Suricata): outbound connections from the ColdFusion host to non-standard ports (4444, 8080, 1337, 9001) or to pastebin and dynamic-DNS targets within ten minutes after any POST to
/CFIDE/. - IOC file carving: hunt for the webshells observed in CVE-2023-26360 campaigns — files such as
hub.cfm,verify.cfm,test.cfmcontainingcfexecutetags orjava.lang.Runtime.getRuntime().execcalls inside CFIDE directories.
- Web access logs: POST or GET requests to
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Adobe ColdFusion versions 2018 Update 15 (and earlier) and 2021 Update 5 (and earlier) are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Source: CSA/SingCERT, pwn.watch, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Adobe | ColdFusion |
|
|
| adobe | coldfusion |
|
|
Vendors and products
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-284Improper Access Control
Pillar
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
Entry at MITRE CWE-284
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| Packet Storm | Adobe ColdFusion Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
References & sources
- helpx.adobe.comVendor advisory: Adobe ColdFusionPatch, Vendor advisory, pwn-watch
- packetstormsecurity.comfiles/172079/Adobe-ColdFusion-Unauthenticated-Remote-Code-Execu…Exploit, Third-party advisory, Vulnerability database
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2023-26360government-resource, Third-party advisory, US government resource
- pwn.watchpwn.watch: Adobe ColdFusion: Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CVE-2023-26360)pwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2023-26360pwn-watch
- cisa.govCISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalogpwn-watch
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2023-26360"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2023-26360.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2023-26360 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>