Veeam Backup & Replication Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (CVE-2022-26500)
Published In CISA KEV since Sources: CVE.org
What is affected, what to do
Improper limitation of path names in Veeam Backup & Replication 9.5U3, 9.5U4,10.x, and 11.x allows remote authenticated users access to internal API functions that allows attackers to upload and execute arbitrary code.
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. The available sources name no fixed version. Check the vendor guidance in the references below. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
Conflicting version data — version display is hidden until the data is resolved.
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
8.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
8.8
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: CVE.org
5.8 %
EPSS score
Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 93.2
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 239.01 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploited
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 8.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 8.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 5.8 %
- Moderate — model estimates 1-10% exploitation likelihood.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 93.2
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This flaw is network-reachable with low attack complexity. NVD says low privileges are required, and CISA describes the internal API as reachable without authentication. Either way, it yields full code execution on the backup server. CISA flags it for known ransomware use: operators deliberately take over backup infrastructure to harvest stored credentials and wipe backups before encrypting production. Exploitation likelihood is high relative to most CVEs, and the impact is existential because it removes your ability to recover. Treat any unpatched Veeam server with port 9380 reachable as critical and remediate within 24 hours, whether or not it sits on the perimeter, because an internal foothold is all an attacker needs.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Inventory and exposure check: Locate every Veeam Backup & Replication server and record its build (Console → Help → About). Affected are 9.5U3 (9.5.0.1536), 9.5U4 (9.5.4.2615), 10.x and 11.x. Run
netstat -ano | findstr :9380to confirm whether the Veeam Distribution Service listens on TCP 9380 and from which networks it is reachable. - Patch: Upgrade v10 to build 10.0.1.4854 and v11 to build 11.0.1.1261, including the cumulative security hotfix referenced in the vendor advisory. Check the Veeam advisory for CVE-2022-26500 for the exact patch level; the same fix covers the sibling flaw CVE-2022-26501. 9.5U3/U4 receives no fix. Migrate those servers to a supported major version, and keep them fully isolated until then.
- Restrict port 9380 now: Until patched, use the host firewall or segment firewall to allow inbound TCP 9380 only from your own Veeam components (proxies, repositories, console). Drop it from client and internet-facing networks.
- Compromise assessment before patching: Run a quick hunt on the backup server (see Detection rules). Patching does not remove persistence an attacker has already planted.
- Rotate credentials if suspicious: Reset every account stored in the Veeam Credentials Manager (domain, hypervisor, repository, cloud) plus local admin accounts on the backup server. The backup server usually holds high-privilege credentials for the whole estate.
- Protect recoverability: Confirm immutable or offline copies exist (Hardened Repository, Object Lock, tape). If not, create an air-gapped copy of critical backups immediately.
- Inventory and exposure check: Locate every Veeam Backup & Replication server and record its build (Console → Help → About). Affected are 9.5U3 (9.5.0.1536), 9.5U4 (9.5.4.2615), 10.x and 11.x. Run
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network segmentation: Place the backup server in a dedicated management/backup VLAN. Allow inbound only from admin jump hosts and Veeam infrastructure, per the Veeam port matrix, with TCP 9380 explicitly on an allowlist. Block outbound internet except update destinations.
- IPS/network rule: Deploy a Suricata/Snort rule that alerts on or drops any connection to
$BACKUP_SERVERSon TCP 9380 from outside$VEEAM_INFRA. Enable any vendor IPS signatures for CVE-2022-26500/26501. - IAM / least privilege: Remove the backup server from the production domain (workgroup or separate management domain). Run Veeam services and stored credentials with least privilege and no Domain Admin accounts. Enforce MFA on console logon.
- Endpoint hardening: Run the EDR in block mode. Use ASR rules or AppLocker/WDAC to prevent unsigned binaries and DLLs from executing out of Veeam install and temp paths. Enable PowerShell Script Block Logging.
- Configuration change: If the Distribution Service is not required on this server (no remote component deployment), assess the operational impact, then stop or disable it until patched.
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata/firewall): Flag TCP 9380 connections from sources outside the Veeam infrastructure, especially clients, VPN pools or external IPs. Zeek example:
conn.log id.resp_p==9380 && !(id.orig_h in veeam_infra). - Process ancestry (Sysmon EID 1 / EDR): Flag Veeam service processes (
Veeam.*.exe) spawning shells or LOLBins. Sigma shape:ParentImage|contains: '\Veeam' AND Image|endswith: ['\cmd.exe','\powershell.exe','\rundll32.exe','\mshta.exe','\certutil.exe']. - File creation (Sysmon EID 11 / EDR): Flag new
.dll/.exefiles written by a Veeam process into Veeam install directories orC:\Windows\Tempoutside a planned update window. - Windows Security log: Watch for 4720/4732 (new account or local admin group change) and 7045 (new service) on the backup server, plus 4624 logon types 3/10 from unusual sources. KQL:
DeviceProcessEvents | where InitiatingProcessFileName startswith "Veeam" and FileName in~ ("cmd.exe","powershell.exe"). - Ransomware staging: Watch for deleted backup jobs or restore points in the Veeam Backup application event log,
vssadmin delete shadows,wbadmin delete, and bulk access to repository shares.
- Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata/firewall): Flag TCP 9380 connections from sources outside the Veeam infrastructure, especially clients, VPN pools or external IPs. Zeek example:
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Improper limitation of path names in Veeam Backup & Replication 9.5U3, 9.5U4,10.x, and 11.x allows remote authenticated users access to internal API functions that allows attackers to upload and execute arbitrary code.
Source: cvelistv5, NVD (NIST), CISA KEV Catalog, CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| veeam | veeam_backup_\&_replication |
|
|
Vendors and products
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited |
References & sources
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2022-26500"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2022-26500.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2022-26500 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>