Open Management Infrastructure (OMI) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (CVE-2021-38647)
Published Last modified In CISA KEV since Sources: SingCERT, CVE.org
- Actively exploited
- Source: ANSSI / CERT-FR How we classify
- Ransomware
- Public exploit
What is affected, what to do
Open Management Infrastructure (OMI) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
The vulnerability is being actively exploited; treat it as a priority. CISA lists it as used in ransomware campaigns. Update open_management_infrastructure to version 1.6.8-1. Immediate actions, mitigation and detection rules are in the runbook below.
- Affected
- Microsoft Azure Automation State Configuration, DSC Extension
gte 2.0.0..* - Microsoft Azure Automation Update Management
gte 1.0.0..* - Microsoft Azure Diagnostics (LAD)
gte 3.0.0..* - Microsoft Azure Security Center
gte 1.0.0..* - Microsoft Azure Sentinel
gte 1.0.0..* - Microsoft Azure Stack Hub
gte 1.0.0..* - Microsoft Container Monitoring Solution
gte 1.0.0..* - Microsoft Log Analytics Agent
gte 1.0.0..* - Microsoft Open Management Infrastructure
gte 16.0..* - Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
gte 1.0.0..*
- Microsoft Azure Automation State Configuration, DSC Extension
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
9.8
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
9.8
CVSS v3
Severity Critical on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: SingCERT, CVE.org
99.93 %
EPSS score
High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.97
Show all metrics
- Severity
- Critical
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 253.95 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- actively exploitedSource: ANSSI / CERT-FR How we classify
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 9.8 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 9.8
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 99.93 %
- High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 99.97
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited
- Published
In CISA KEV since
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: active · automatable · Technical impact: total
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 4 February 2025
Response and mitigation
Why act now?
Prioritisation rationale
This flaw is network-reachable without authentication: a single HTTP request that omits the Authorization header yields code execution as root. The exploit is trivial, publicly documented, and among the CVEs most likely to be exploited. Mass scanning, botnets and cryptominers hit vulnerable hosts within days of disclosure, and CISA flags known ransomware use. The highest-risk targets are Azure Linux VMs where management extensions silently installed OMI, and SCOM-managed Linux servers. Rate any host with a vulnerable OMI build and an externally reachable port as critical and fix it immediately. Internal-only hosts follow at high priority within your emergency patch window.
Runbook step 1
Immediate response (0-24 h)
- Inventory every Linux host running OMI: Azure Linux VMs with Log Analytics Agent (OMS), Azure Diagnostics (LAD), Automation Update Management/State Configuration, Defender for Cloud, Sentinel connectors, Container Monitoring, plus on-prem servers with the SCOM Linux agent. Check the version with
dpkg -l omi/rpm -q omior/opt/omi/bin/omiserver --version. - Upgrade OMI to the vendor-fixed release (per the MSRC advisory, OMI 1.6.8-1 or later; verify against the vendor advisory). Azure VM extensions are not always auto-updated, so push the package manually from the Microsoft repository or GitHub release and restart
omid. - Block external reachability of the OMI ports now: TCP 5985, 5986 and 1270 via NSG, firewall or security group for internet and untrusted sources. Port 1270 is open by default on SCOM deployments.
- Treat exposed, unpatched hosts as potentially compromised: take snapshots or forensic copies, capture the process list and cron jobs, and hunt for miners, webshells or botnet binaries. Isolate and rebuild on any hit.
- Rotate secrets on affected hosts: SSH keys, managed identity tokens, workspace keys and service principal secrets. Exploitation yields root, which exposes everything stored locally.
- Inventory every Linux host running OMI: Azure Linux VMs with Log Analytics Agent (OMS), Azure Diagnostics (LAD), Automation Update Management/State Configuration, Defender for Cloud, Sentinel connectors, Container Monitoring, plus on-prem servers with the SCOM Linux agent. Check the version with
Runbook step 2
Mitigation layers
- Network segmentation: allow 5985/5986/1270 only from dedicated management hosts such as SCOM management servers. In Azure, add a high-priority deny rule in NSGs or Azure Firewall and enforce it with Azure Policy.
- IPS/WAF: match HTTP POST to
/wsmanwith a SOAP body containingExecuteShellCommandorExecuteScript(classSCX_OperatingSystem) and noAuthorizationheader. Enable the CVE-2021-38647 signatures in mainstream rulesets (ET Open/Pro). - Configuration hardening: if remote OMI management is not needed, set
httpport=0andhttpsport=0(or bind to localhost) in/etc/opt/omi/conf/omiserver.confand restartomid. Local agent functions such as log collection keep working. - Asset and vulnerability management: scan continuously for installed OMI versions via Defender for Cloud or your vulnerability scanner. Update golden images and VM templates so new instances do not ship vulnerable.
- Endpoint hardening: enable EDR or auditd on Linux VMs. Restrict server egress to required destinations to hinder payload download.
Runbook step 3
Detection rules
- Process ancestry (EDR/auditd):
omiagentoromienginespawning/bin/sh,bash,curl,wgetorpythonasuid=0. Sigma shape:ParentImage|endswith: '/omiagent' and Image|endswith: ['/sh','/bash','/curl','/wget']. - auditd:
-a always,exit -F arch=b64 -S execve, filtered on OMI parent processes. Alert on rootexecveevents originating from the OMI process tree. - Network telemetry (Zeek/Suricata): inbound HTTP(S) to 5985/5986/1270 from the internet. In Zeek
http.log, look foruri == "/wsman"withmethod == "POST"from external IPs and no Authorization header. - Azure/Sentinel (KQL):
AzureNetworkAnalytics_CL | where DestPort_d in (5985,5986,1270) and FlowDirection_s == "I" and FlowStatus_s == "A". Correlate with Defender for Cloud OMI exploitation alerts. - Post-exploitation: new cron entries, unknown binaries in
/tmpor/dev/shm, sustained high CPU from miners, and changes to~/.ssh/authorized_keyson OMI hosts.
- Process ancestry (EDR/auditd):
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- Actively exploited: treat the vulnerability as a priority in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2. If it is exploited in your environment, check the reporting obligation under Art. 23 (early warning within 24 hours).
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- Since 11.09.2026, manufacturers of affected products with digital elements must report actively exploited vulnerabilities under Art. 14 CRA, with an early warning within 24 hours via ENISA's single reporting platform.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
Open Management Infrastructure (OMI) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Source: CSA/SingCERT, CISA KEV Catalog, NVD (NIST), cvelistv5, CVE.org (MITRE)
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Azure Automation State Configuration, DSC Extension |
|
|
| Microsoft | Azure Automation Update Management |
|
|
| Microsoft | Azure Diagnostics (LAD) |
|
|
| Microsoft | Azure Security Center |
|
|
| Microsoft | Azure Sentinel |
|
|
| Microsoft | Azure Stack Hub |
|
|
| Microsoft | Container Monitoring Solution |
|
|
| Microsoft | Log Analytics Agent |
|
|
| Microsoft | Open Management Infrastructure |
|
|
| Microsoft | System Center Operations Manager (SCOM) |
|
|
| microsoft | azure_automation_state_configuration |
|
|
| microsoft | azure_automation_update_management |
|
|
| microsoft | azure_diagnostics_\(lad\) |
|
|
| microsoft | azure_security_center |
|
|
| microsoft | azure_sentinel |
|
|
| microsoft | azure_stack_hub |
|
|
| microsoft | container_monitoring_solution |
|
|
| microsoft | log_analytics_agent |
|
|
| microsoft | open_management_infrastructure |
|
|
| microsoft | system_center_operations_manager |
|
|
Vendors and products
- Microsoft Azure Automation State Configuration
- Microsoft Azure Automation State Configuration, Dsc Extension
- Microsoft Azure Automation Update Management
- Microsoft Azure Diagnostics (lad)
- Microsoft Azure Security Center
- Microsoft Azure Sentinel
- Microsoft Azure Stack Hub
- Microsoft Container Monitoring Solution
- Microsoft Log Analytics Agent
- Microsoft Open Management Infrastructure
- Microsoft Microsoft System Center 2019 Operations Manager
- Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (scom)
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| CISA KEV Catalog | CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability (opens in a new tab)cisa.gov | actively exploited | |
| ANSSI / CERT-FRLicence Ouverte 2.0, as of | CERTFR-2021-ALE-020 – [Maj] Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Azure Open Management Infrastructure (clôturée 2022-01-05) (opens in a new tab)cert.cyber.gouv.fr | actively exploited | |
| Packet Storm | Microsoft OMI Management Interface Authentication Bypass (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
References & sources
- portal.msrc.microsoft.comen-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-38647x_refsource_MISC, x_transferred
- packetstormsecurity.comfiles/164694/Microsoft-OMI-Management-Interface-Authentication-…x_refsource_MISC, x_transferred
- Microsoft Security Update GuideOpen Management Infrastructure (OMI) Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityVendor advisory, Patch
- cisa.govknown-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2021-38647government-resource
- cert.cyber.gouv.frANSSI / CERT-FR: CERTFR-2021-ALE-020 – [Maj] Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Azure Open Management Infrastructure (clôturée 2022-01-05)cert-fr
Changes to this CVE
Who changed this CVE and when: NVD (analysis, affected products, CVSS), the CVE publisher (CNA) and additional providers such as CISA (ADP).
NVD analysis modifiedNVD
Product mapping changed:- Microsoft System Center 2019 Operations Manager
- Microsoft Azure Automation State Configuration
- Microsoft Azure Automation Update Management
- Microsoft azure diagnostics (lad)
- Microsoft Azure Security Center
- Microsoft Azure Sentinel
- Microsoft Azure Stack Hub
- Microsoft Container Monitoring Solution
- Microsoft Log Analytics Agent
- Microsoft Open Management Infrastructure (before 1.6.8-1)
Show 2 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Product configuration changed OR *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:system_center_operations_manager:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_automation_state_configuration:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_automation_update_management:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_diagnostics_(lad):-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_open_management_infrastructure:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_security_center:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_sentinel:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_stack_hub:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:container_monitoring_solution:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:log_analytics_agent:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*OR *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:system_center_operations_manager:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_automation_state_configuration:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_automation_update_management:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_diagnostics_(lad):-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_security_center:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_sentinel:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:azure_stack_hub:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:container_monitoring_solution:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:log_analytics_agent:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* *cpe:2.3:a:microsoft:open_management_infrastructure:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* versions up to (excluding) 1.6.8-1Reference type added —Microsoft Corporation: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-38647 Types: Patch, Vendor AdvisorySource identifier: nvd@nist.gov
Record modifiedMicrosoft
Description added or changed
Show 7 original changes
Individual changes of this event as published by NVD Type Action Before After Affected versions (publisher) changed Open Management Infrastructure, System Center Operations Manager (SCOM), Azure Automation State Configuration, DSC Extension (+7)Azure Automation State Configuration, DSC Extension, Azure Automation Update Management, Azure Diagnostics (LAD) (+7)Description changed Open Management Infrastructure Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityOpen Management Infrastructure (OMI) Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityReference added —https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-38647Reference removed http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/164694/Microsoft-OMI-Management-Interface-Authentication-Bypass.html—Reference removed https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-38647—Reference type removed http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/164694/Microsoft-OMI-Management-Interface-Authentication-Bypass.html Types: Exploit, Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry—Reference type removed https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-38647 Types: Patch, Vendor Advisory—Source identifier: secure@microsoft.com
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2021-38647"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2021-38647.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2021-38647 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>