Apache Tomcat: Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types (CVE-2022-34169)
Published Sources: BSI
What is affected, what to do
The Apache Xalan Java XSLT library is vulnerable to an integer truncation issue when processing malicious XSLT stylesheets. This can be used to corrupt Java class files generated by the internal XSLTC compiler and execute arbitrary Java bytecode.
An exploit is publicly available. Update tomcat to version 10.1.58, jackson-databind to version 2.18.8, Tomcat to version 10.1.57.
- Affected
- Apache Xalan-J
lte Xalan-J..2.7.2
- Apache Xalan-J
Not sure whether and how you are affected? Ask a question about this vulnerability
Metrics
7.5
Priority
XIEM Effective CVSS: highest available CVSS rating from NVD and vendor data.
Source: NVD, CVSS v3
7.5
CVSS v3
Severity High on the scale from 0 to 10.
Source: BSI
81.8 %
EPSS score
High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
Source: FIRST EPSS, percentile 99.64
Show all metrics
- Severity
- High
Priority (0–325)
The priority score is a consolidated metric that condenses several individual signals into a single, action-guiding ranking: technical severity (CVSS), exploitation likelihood (EPSS), known-exploited status (KEV) and the context of the affected asset. The aim is to answer the only truly important question in vulnerability management: what first?
Read in glossary- 68.06 Methodology
Exploit maturity
An exploit is code or a technique that specifically uses a concrete vulnerability to force unintended behaviour — such as executing code or escalating privileges. It is the tool that turns a theoretical flaw into a practical attack.
Read in glossary- PoC (publicly reported)
XIEM Effective CVSS
XIEM® is the tiered managed-security operating model from NEOSEC and a registered trademark of NEOSEC GmbH. It extends classic SIEM — the central collection, normalisation and correlation of security-relevant events — with endpoint forensics, network visibility and deception technology, and consolidates them into three building tiers: Sentry, Orchestrate and Command.
Read in glossary- 7.5 Methodology
CVSS v3
CVSS is the globally established, open standard for assessing the technical severity of a vulnerability on a scale from 0 to 10. It describes how easily a flaw can be exploited and what damage it can cause — but not how likely its actual exploitation is. CVSS and the complementary EPSS deliberately answer different questions.
Read in glossary- 7.5
EPSS score
The EPSS score is the absolute model output for an individual vulnerability: the estimated probability of real-world exploitation within the next 30 days, expressed as a value between 0 and 1 (i.e. 0 % to 100 %). A score of 0.42 means „the model estimates a 42 % chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days“.
Read in glossary- 81.8 %
- High — model estimates ≥ 50% chance of real-world exploitation within 30 days.
EPSS percentile
The EPSS percentile is the relative position of a vulnerability within all EPSS-scored CVEs, expressed as a value between 0 and 1. A percentile of 0.90 means „this CVE has a higher EPSS score than 90 % of all other scored CVEs“. Unlike the EPSS score, it is not a probability — but a positioning within a ranking.
Read in glossary- 99.64
- Critical — this CVE ranks in the top fifth of all CVEs scored today (rank ≥ 80%).
KEV status
The KEV catalogue is a list maintained by the US authority CISA of vulnerabilities for which active exploitation in the wild has been confirmed. It answers not the question „how severe?“ but „is it already being attacked?“ — thereby sharply prioritising patching.
Read in glossary- —
- Published
- CISA assessment (SSVC)
- Exploitation: none known · automatable · Technical impact: partial
- Source: CISA Vulnrichment, as of 20 May 2025
CWE
CWE is a catalogue of typical weakness types in software and hardware — such as flawed input validation, unsafe memory handling or poor authentication. Where a CVE names a concrete vulnerability in a concrete product, a CWE describes the underlying class of defect.
Read in glossary- CWE-681
Detection rules
No NEOSEC detection rule is available for this vulnerability yet.
Classification under NIS2 and CRA
Rule-based classification from exploitation status and severity. It does not replace a case-by-case assessment.
NIS2
NIS2 is EU Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to raise the level of cybersecurity across the Union. It substantially broadens obligations compared with the first NIS directive: more sectors, mandatory risk management, staged reporting duties and personal accountability of senior management.
Read in glossary- High technical severity: assess and remediate the vulnerability in vulnerability handling under Art. 21(2)(e) NIS2 and document the decision.
CRA
The CRA is EU Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 setting horizontal cybersecurity requirements for „products with digital elements“ — from industrial controllers and software to connected consumer devices. For the first time manufacturers must ensure security across the entire product lifecycle, handle vulnerabilities and provide security updates.
Read in glossary- From 11.12.2027, Annex I Part II CRA requires manufacturers of affected products with digital elements to handle vulnerabilities without delay and provide security updates.
ISO/IEC 27001
ISO/IEC 27001 is the internationally leading standard for an information security management system (ISMS). It describes a risk-based, process-oriented framework to systematically plan, implement, review and improve information security.
Read in glossary- Control A.8.8, management of technical vulnerabilities: assess relevance to your systems, plan remediation and keep evidence.
Description
The Apache Xalan Java XSLT library is vulnerable to an integer truncation issue when processing malicious XSLT stylesheets. This can be used to corrupt Java class files generated by the internal XSLTC compiler and execute arbitrary Java bytecode. Users are recommended to update to version 2.7.3 or later. Note: Java runtimes (such as OpenJDK) include repackaged copies of Xalan.
Source: BSI WID Portal
Affected products
The following versions are affected. Older releases of the same product line are also vulnerable unless stated otherwise.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Tomcat |
|
|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Xalan-J |
|
|
| FasterXML | jackson-databind |
|
|
| Oracle Corporation | Oracle Agile Engineering Data Management |
|
|
| Oracle Corporation | Oracle Agile PLM |
|
|
| Oracle Corporation | Oracle Agile PLM MCAD Connector |
|
|
| Oracle Corporation | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process |
|
|
| Oracle Corporation | Oracle Demand Planning |
|
|
| Oracle Corporation | Oracle Product Lifecycle Analytics |
|
|
| apache | tomcat |
|
|
| apache | xalan-java |
|
|
| azul | zulu |
|
|
| fasterxml | jackson-databind |
|
|
| netapp | 7-mode_transition_tool |
|
|
| netapp | active_iq_unified_manager |
|
|
| netapp | cloud_insights_acquisition_unit |
|
|
| netapp | cloud_secure_agent |
|
|
| netapp | hci_compute_node |
|
|
| netapp | hci_management_node |
|
|
| netapp | oncommand_insight |
|
|
| netapp | solidfire |
|
|
| oracle | graalvm |
|
|
| oracle | jdk |
|
|
| oracle | jre |
|
|
From bundled advisories, not CVE-specific (43)
Product list of a bundled advisory that does not state which product this CVE affects.
| Affected versions | Fixed in | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| — | jackson-databind (FasterXML Jackson, Java) |
|
|
| Atlassian | Bamboo Data Center LTS |
|
|
| Atlassian | Bamboo LTS |
|
|
| Atlassian | Bitbucket |
|
|
| Atlassian | Bitbucket Data Center |
|
|
| Atlassian | Bitbucket Data Center LTS |
|
|
| Atlassian | Bitbucket LTS |
|
|
| Atlassian | Confluence |
|
|
| Atlassian | Confluence Data Center LTS |
|
|
| Atlassian | Confluence LTS |
|
|
| Atlassian | Crucible |
|
|
| Atlassian | Fisheye |
|
|
| Atlassian | Jira Data Center LTS |
|
|
| Atlassian | Jira LTS |
|
|
| Atlassian | Jira Service Management Data Center LTS |
|
|
Vendors and products
Affected operating systems
| Linux | debian | bcel | bullseye |
| Linux | debian | debian_linux | 10.0 |
| Linux | debian | debian_linux | 11.0 |
| Linux | debian | openjdk-11 | bullseye |
| Linux | debian | openjdk-11 | buster |
| Linux | debian | openjdk-17 | bullseye |
| Other | fedoraproject | fedora | 35 |
| Other | fedoraproject | fedora | 36 |
Weakness classes (CWE)
CWE-681Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types
Base
When converting from one data type to another, such as long to integer, data can be omitted or translated in a way that produces unexpected values. If the resulting values are used in a sensitive context, then dangerous behaviors may occur.
Entry at MITRE CWE-681
Public exploit references
Publicly reported proof-of-concepts, exploit modules and detection templates for this vulnerability. NEOSEC links to the original sources only and does not provide any exploit code.
| Packet Storm | Xalan J XSLTC Integer Truncation (opens in a new tab)packetstormsecurity.com | PoC (publicly reported)reported, not verified | — |
References & sources
- oracle.comOracle AdvisoryVendor advisory
- lists.apache.orgthread/8robqo76q0osxgw0b5lcwgz0hcf9h4zcVendor advisory
- openwall.comlists/oss-security/2026/08/26/8
- NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2026-68569web
- github.comFasterXML/jackson-databind/security/advisories/GHSA-j3rv-43j4-c…web, x_refsource_CONFIRM, Exploit, Vendor advisory
- NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54512advisory
- github.comFasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/5988web, x_refsource_MISC, Issue tracking, Patch
- github.comFasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/434d6c511de7fdd9872f29157aafb…web, x_refsource_MISC, Patch
- github.comFasterXML/jackson-databindpackage
- pwn.watchpwn.watch: jackson-databind: PolymorphicTypeValidator bypass via generic type arguments allows arbitrary class instantiation (CVE-2026-110879)pwn-watch
- github.comGHSA-m8xf-2cr7-77ph: PolymorphicTypeValidator bypass via generic type arguments and array element types allows arbitrary class instantiation (CVE-2026-110879)pwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)NVD: CVE-2026-110879 (CVSS 3.1 9.8 critical, CWE-502, from the CNA)pwn-watch
- NVD (NIST)vuln/detail/CVE-2022-34169advisory
- xalan.apache.orgweb
- oracle.comsecurity-alerts/cpujul2022.htmlweb, Patch, Third-party advisory
- debian.orgDSA-5256web, Vendor advisory, Third-party advisory
- debian.orgDSA-5192web, Vendor advisory, Third-party advisory
- debian.orgDSA-5188web, Vendor advisory, Third-party advisory
- security.netapp.comadvisory/ntap-20240621-0006web
- security.netapp.comadvisory/ntap-20220729-0009web
Linked CVEs
| High | CVE-2026-91625 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: security vulnerability | 8.2 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-91624 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: Missing Authentication for Critical Function | 9.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-91623 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: security vulnerability | 7.4 | — |
| Critical | CVE-2026-91622 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: security vulnerability | 9.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-91604 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: security vulnerability | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-91573 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: security vulnerability | 8.2 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-91565 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: Denial of Service | 6.4 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-91550 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: security vulnerability | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-91521 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: security vulnerability | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-91520 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: security vulnerability | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-91515 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: security vulnerability | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-91512 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: security vulnerability | 7.2 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-87362 | Oracle Agile PLM: security vulnerability | 6.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-83394 | Oracle Demand Planning: security vulnerability | 6.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-68569 | Apache Tomcat: Principal lookup can fail open in some cases | 8.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-54512 | FasterXML Jackson-databind: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs | 8.1 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-101746 | Oracle Agile Engineering Data Management: Improper Access Control | 7.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101745 | Oracle Agile Engineering Data Management: Improper Access Control | 5.3 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-101744 | Oracle Agile Engineering Data Management: Improper Access Control | 8.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101741 | Oracle Agile Engineering Data Management: Improper Access Control | 5.3 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-101740 | Oracle Agile Engineering Data Management: Improper Access Control | 3.6 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-101739 | Oracle Agile Engineering Data Management: Improper Access Control | 7.0 | — |
| Low | CVE-2026-101738 | Oracle Agile Engineering Data Management: Improper Access Control | 3.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101734 | Oracle Agile Engineering Data Management: Improper Access Control | 4.3 | — |
Show 26 more CVEs
| Medium | CVE-2026-101723 | Oracle Agile PLM MCAD Connector: Improper Access Control | 6.7 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-101719 | Oracle Agile PLM: Improper Access Control | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101718 | Oracle Agile PLM: Improper Access Control | 6.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101717 | Oracle Agile PLM: Improper Access Control | 6.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101716 | Oracle Agile PLM: Improper Access Control | 5.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101715 | Oracle Agile PLM: Improper Access Control | 6.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101714 | Oracle Agile PLM: Improper Access Control | 6.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101713 | Oracle Agile PLM: Improper Access Control | 5.4 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-101602 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: security vulnerability | 8.0 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-101596 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: security vulnerability | 8.8 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101595 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: security vulnerability | 5.4 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-101594 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: security vulnerability | 8.8 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-101593 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: Denial of Service | 8.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101592 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: security vulnerability | 5.4 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101591 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: security vulnerability | 4.3 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101565 | Oracle Agile PLM: security vulnerability | 6.2 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101564 | Oracle Agile PLM: security vulnerability | 5.9 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-101562 | Oracle Agile PLM: security vulnerability | 7.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101547 | Oracle Demand Planning: security vulnerability | 6.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101474 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: Denial of Service | 5.9 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-101473 | Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process: security vulnerability | 8.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101472 | Oracle Product Lifecycle Analytics: security vulnerability | 5.5 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101471 | Oracle Product Lifecycle Analytics: Denial of Service | 6.1 | — |
| Medium | CVE-2026-101470 | Oracle Product Lifecycle Analytics: security vulnerability | 6.0 | — |
| High | CVE-2026-101469 | Oracle Product Lifecycle Analytics: SQL Injection | 7.5 | — |
| High | CVE-2022-34169 | Apache Xalan-J: security vulnerability | 7.5 | — |
Embed badge
Show the severity and KEV status of this vulnerability on your site – with a link back here. The image is updated hourly.
<a href="https://intel.neosec.eu/en/cve/CVE-2022-34169"><img src="https://intel.neosec.eu/badge/cve/CVE-2022-34169.svg?lang=en" alt="CVE-2022-34169 – NEOSEC Intel" height="20"></a>